Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A methodology for the evaluation of travel techniques for immersive virtual environments

  • Published:
Virtual Reality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a framework for the analysis and evaluation oftravel, or viewpoint motion control, techniques for use in immersive virtual environments (VEs). In previous work, we presented a taxonomy of travel techniques and a set of experiments mapping parts of the taxonomy to various performance metrics. Since these initial experiments, we have expanded the framework to allow evaluation of not only the effects of different travel techniques, but also the effects of many outside factors simultaneously. Combining this expanded framework with the measurement of multiple response variables epitomises the philosophy oftestbed evaluation. This experimental philosophy leads to a deeper understanding of the interaction and the technique(s) in question, as well as to broadly generalisable results. We also present an example experiment within this expanded framework, which evaluates the user's ability to gather information while travelling through a virtual environment. Results indicate that, of the variables tested, the complexity of the environment is by far the most important factor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Herndon K, van Dam A, Gleicher M. The challenges of 3D interaction. SIGCHI Bulletin 1994; 26(4): 36–43

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schieser E. Principles of navigation. In: Handbook of modern electronics and electrical engineering. Belove C. ed. Chichester: Wiley 1986

    Google Scholar 

  3. Warren R, Wertheim A. (eds.) Perception and control of self-motion. Erlbaum. Hillsdale, NJ 1990

  4. Wickens C, Baker P. Cognitive issues in virtual reality. In: Virtual environments and advanced interface design Barfield W, Furness T, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1995

    Google Scholar 

  5. Darken R, Sibert J. A toolset for navigation in virtual environments. Proceedings of the Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology 1993; 157–165

  6. Darken R, Sibert J. Navigating in large virtual worlds. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 1996; 8(1): 49–72

    Google Scholar 

  7. Darken R, Sibert J. Wayfinding strategies and behaviors in large virtual worlds. Proceedings of CHI 1996; 142–149

  8. Ingram R Benford S. Legibility enhancement for information visualization. Proceedings of Visualization 1995; 209–216

  9. Lynch, K. The image of the city. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1960

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ware C, Jessome D. Using the bat: A six-dimensional mouse for object placement. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 1988; 8(6): 65–70

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ware C, Osborne S. Exploration and virtual camera control in virtual three-dimensional environments. Proceedings of the Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics 1990; 175–183

  12. Pausch R, Burnette T, Brockway D, Weiblen M. Navigation and locomotion in virtual worlds via flight into hand-held miniatures. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH. In: Computer Graphcis 1995; 29(4): 399–400

    Google Scholar 

  13. Strommen E. Children's use of mouse-based interfaces to control virtual travel. Proceedings of CHI 1994; 405–410

  14. Mackinlay J, Card S, Robertson G. Rapid controlled movement through a virtual 3D workspace. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH. In: Computer Graphics 1990; 24(4): 171–176

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ware C, Slipp L. Using velocity control to navigate 3D graphical environments: a comparison of three interfaces. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting 1991: 300–304

  16. Mine M. Virtual environment interaction techniques. UNC Chapel Hill Computer Science Technical Report TR95-018; 1995

  17. Robinett W, Holloway R. Implementation of flying, scaling, and grabbing in virtual worlds. Proceedings of the Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics 1992;189–192

  18. Chung J. A comparison of head-tracked and non-head-tracked steering modes in the targeting of radiotherapy treatment beams. Proceedings of the Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics 1992; 193–196

  19. Mercurio P, Erickson T, Diaper D, Gilmore D, Cockton G, Shackel B. Interactive scientific visualization: an assessment of a virtual reality system. Proceedings of INTERACT 1990; 741–745

  20. Iwata H, Fujii T. Virtual perambulator: a novel interface device for locomotion in virtual environment. Proceedings of the Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium 1996; 60–65

  21. Slater M, Usoh M, Steed A. Taking steps: the influence of a walking metaphor on presence in virtual reality, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 1995; 2(3): 201–219

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stanney K. Realizing the full potential of virtual reality: human factors issues that could stand in the way. Proceedings of the Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium 1995; 28–34

  23. Bowman D, Koller D, Hodges L. Travel in immersive virtual environments: an evaluation of viewpoint motion control techniques. Proceedings of the Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium 1997; 45–52

  24. Chin J, Diehl V, Norman K. Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface. Proceedings of CHI 1988; 213–218

  25. Kennedy R, Lane N, Berbaum K, Lilienthal M. A simulator sickness questionnaire (SSQ): A new method for quantifying simulator sickness. International Journal of Aviation Psychology 1993; 3(3):203–220

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kobsa A, Wahlster W (eds) User models in dialog systems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York 1989

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bowman D, Hodges L. An evaluation of techniques for grabbing and manipulating remote objects in immersive virtual environments. Proceedings of the Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics 1997; 35–38

  28. Poupyrev I, Billinghurst M, Weghorst S, Ichikawa T. The go-go interaction technique: non-linear mapping for direct manipulation in VR. Proceedings of the Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology 1996; 79–80

  29. Ware C, Balakrishnan R. Reaching for objects in VR displays: lag and frame rate. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 1994; 1(4): 331–356

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lampton D, Knerr B, Goldberg S, Bliss J, Moshell J, Blau B. The virtual environment performance assessment battery (VEPAB): development and evaluation. Presence 1994; 3(2): 145–157

    Google Scholar 

  31. Brooks F. et al. Final technical report: Walkthrough Project. Report to National Science Foundation 1992

  32. Bolter J, Hodges L, Meyer T, Nichols A. Integrating perceptual and symbolic information in VR. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 1995; 15(4): 8–11

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tate D, Sibert L, King T. Virtual environments for shipboard firefighting training. Proceedings of the Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium 1997; 61–68

  34. Allison D, Wills B, Hodges L, Wineman J. Gorillas in the bits. Proceedings of the Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium 1997; 69–76

  35. Miller G. The magical number seven plus or minus two some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 1956; 63(2): 81–97

    Google Scholar 

  36. Baddeley A. Working memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B 1983; 302: 311–324

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Computing, Graphics, Visualization, and Usability Center, 801 Atiantic Drive, 30332-0280, Atlanta, GA, USA

    D. A. Bowman, D. Koller & L. F. Hodges

Authors
  1. D. A. Bowman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. Koller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L. F. Hodges
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. A. Bowman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bowman, D.A., Koller, D. & Hodges, L.F. A methodology for the evaluation of travel techniques for immersive virtual environments. Virtual Reality 3, 120–131 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01417673

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01417673

Keywords

Search

Navigation