Skip to main content
Log in

Conflict analysis of the NAFTA negotiations

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The 1991–92 negotiations for a North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) are modelled at two points in time during the negotiation process from a Mexican perspective. The first model in February 1992 captures the positions of the parties on several key issues. The second model in April 1992 concentrates on the energy issue, which is of particular importance to Mexico. The formal model provided a framework for structuring the negotiation, and a communications medium for discussing and recording it. The analyses were fairly accurate as predictors of events and could have been effective in giving advice to the negotiations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bennett, P., A. Tait, and K. Macdonagh. (1993). Interact (Computer Program), Department of Management Science, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XH, Scotland, Tel. 041-552-4400 Ext. 3798, Fax. 041-552-6686.

  • Financial Times. (1992). “Logran acuerdo sobre contentido local en TLC.” Reported inEl Porvenir (Monterrey, N.L. Mexico), June 10.

  • Fraser, N.M., and K.W. Hipel. (1984).Conflict Analysis: Models and Resolutions. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N.M., and K.W. Hipel. (1992). DecisionMaker: The Conflict Analysis Program. Copyright © N.M. Fraser and K.W. Hipel. Distributed by Waterloo Engineering Software, 22 Dupont St. E., Waterloo, Ontario, N2J 2G9 Canada, Tel. (519) 885-2450, Fax. (519) 746-7931.

  • Howard, N. (1993). CONAN (Computer Program). Distributed by Nigel Howard Systems, 10 Bloomsfield Road, Birmingham B13 9BY England, Tel./Fax. 021-449-4480.

  • Hufbauer, G.C., and J.J. Schott. (1992).North American Free Trade: Issues and Recommendations. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, R.G., and R.C. York. (1988).Evaluating the Free Trade Deal: A Guided Tour through the Canada-U.S. Agreement. Policy Study No. 6, C.D. Howe Institute. Toronto: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, H.E. (1979). “Why a North American Common Market Won't Work-Yet,”Fortune, September 10, 1979, pp. 118–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A., and A.M. Chammah. (1965).Prisoner's Dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.G. (1988). “The Free Trade Agreement in Context: A Canadian Perspective.” In J.J. Smith and M.G. Smith (eds.),The Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement: The Global Impact. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fraser, N.M., Garcia, F. Conflict analysis of the NAFTA negotiations. Group Decis Negot 3, 373–391 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01414412

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01414412

Key words

Navigation