Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical analysis of density gradient centrifugation profiles from eukaryotic DNA

  • Published:
Colloid and Polymer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A numerical method for the deconvolution of superimposed Gaussian distributions with a unique solution has been proposed by Medgyessy [10]. We have tested the usefulness of this method for the analysis of density gradient centrifugation profiles from eukaryotic DNA, which are normally composed from overlapping Gaussian distributed profiles of several subcomponents with different mean buoyant densities. From the analysis of human DNA and from model calculations we conclude that major subcomponents can be identified by this method, if they differ in their buoyant density by approximatly 0.005 g/ml. Minor components can only be identified if the total DNA has been fractionated according to buoyant density and the analysis is performed on the density profiles of the subfractions. This procedure represents a quick method to determine a reliable minimum number of subcomponents of DNA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Filipski J, Thiery JP, Bernardi G (1973) J Mol Biol 80:177–197

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Thiery JP, Macaya G, Bernardi G (1976) J Mol Biol 108:219–235

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Macaya G, Thiery JP, Bernardi G (1976) J Mol Biol 108:237–254

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cortades J, Olofsson B, Meunier-Rotival M, Macaya G, Bernardi G (1979) Eur J Biochem 99:179–186

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cuny G, Soriano P, Macaya G, Bernardi G (1981) Eur J Biochem 115:227–233

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Salinas J, Zerial M, Filipski J, Bernardi G (1986) Eur J Biochem 160:469–478

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zerial M, Salinas J, Filipski J, Bernardi G (1986) Eur J Biochem 160:479–485

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bernardi G, Bernardi G (1986) Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 51:479–487

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mouchiroud D, Fichant G, Bernardi G (1987) J Mol Evol 26:198–204

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Medgyessy P (1961) Decomposition of Superpositions of Distribution Functions. Publishing House of the Hung Acad Sci, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hönig W, Zahn RK, Heitz W (1973) Analytical Biochem 55:34–50

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eigner J, Doty P (1965) J Mol Biol 12:549–580

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hearst JE, Vinograd J (1961) Proc Natl Acad Sci (Wash) 47:1005–1014

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gabarro J (1978) Analytical Biochem 91:309–322

    Google Scholar 

  15. Szecsi A, Dobrovolszky A (1980) Nucleic Acids Res 8:2517–2525

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cuellar RE, Ford GA, Briggs WR, Thompson WF (1978) Proc Natl Acad Sci (Wash) 75:6026–6030

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yen WS, Blake RD (1980) Biopolymers 19:681–700

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Butler WL, Hopkins DW (1970) Photochem Photobiol 12:439–450

    Google Scholar 

  19. Butler WL, Hopkins DW (1970) Photochem Photobiol 12:451–456

    Google Scholar 

  20. Reisner AH (1980) Analytical Biochem 105:24–31

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weinblum, D., Geisert, M. & Oswald, E. Numerical analysis of density gradient centrifugation profiles from eukaryotic DNA. Colloid & Polymer Sci 268, 55–59 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01410423

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01410423

Key words

Navigation