Skip to main content
Log in

Policy sciences perspectives on implementation processes

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Implementation, from which flows operational policy, is an integral part of the policymaking process. This phenomenon is examined briefly as a socio-political process, an administrative task, a follow-on from systematic analysis, a problem in the diffusion and utilization of knowledge, and a basic capacity which is differentially distributed among organizations and subject to deliberate change. A three-dimensional framework for assessing the nature of implementation tasks and for making strategic choices in planning implementation is proposed and illustrated. Finally, implementation processes in a federalistic system are described as requiring multi-level participation of four classes of participants: administrative-bureaucratic, political leadership, rational-analytic and constituent elites. A variety of functions must be performed at federal, regional, and local levels to assure policy execution consistent with both policy designs and local contingencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gergen, K., “Assessing the Leverage Points in the Process of Policy Formation,” in Bauer, R. A. and Gergen, K. H., eds.,The Study of Policy Formation, Ch. 5. New York: The Free Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jones, C. O.,An Introduction to the Study of Public Policy. Belmont, California: Wadsworth, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dror, Y.,Public Policymaking Reexamined. San Francisco: Chandler, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gross, B., “Activating National Plans,” in Lawrence, J. R., ed.,Operational Research and the Social Sciences. London: Tavistock, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dror, Y., “Prolegoma to the Policy Sciences,”Policy Sciences, 1, No. 1 (Spring 1970).

  6. Dror, Y.,Analytical Approaches and Applied Social Sciences. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation, p. 4248, November 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ratoosh, P., “Experimental Studies of Implementation,” in Lawrence, J. R., ed.,Operational Research and the Social Sciences. London: Tavistock, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Archibald, K.,The Use of Analytical Resources. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation, May 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Duffy, N. F. and Taylor, P. M. “The Implementation of a Decision,” in Greenwood, W. T., ed.,Decision Theory and Information Systems. Cincinnati: Southwestern, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Churchman, C. W. and Schainblatt, A. H., “PPB: How Can It Be Implemented?,”Public Administration Review, XXIX, No. 2 (March–April 1969), pp. 178–189.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Biderman, A., “Information, Intelligence, Enlightened Public Policy: Functions and Organization of Societal Feedback,”Policy Sciences, 1, No. 2 (Summer 1970).

  12. Etzioni, A., “Policy Research.” Mimeo, 1970.

  13. Ilchman, W. F. and Uphoff, N. T.,The Political Economy of Change. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Revision of a paper delivered to American Association for the Advancement of Science, 138th Meeting, Chicago, Illinois, December 27, 1970.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bunker, D.R. Policy sciences perspectives on implementation processes. Policy Sci 3, 71–80 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405218

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405218

Keywords

Navigation