Skip to main content
Log in

An index of weed size for assessing the soil productivity of ancient crop fields

  • Published:
Vegetation History and Archaeobotany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A method is presented for generating data on archaeological weed species relevant to soil productivity and consequently crop husbandry. Three plant attributes (maximum canopy height, maximum canopy spread and maximum dry leaf weight per node) which are functionally related to habitat productivity were measured for 161 British annual species. These three attributes were combined to produce an index of weed size. Index values were found to differ significantly between character species of phytosociological classes from fertile and infertile habitats and to provide an objective assessment of CSR (Competitor/Stress-tolerator/Ruderal) strategysensu Grime (1974, 1979). Further work is required, however, to distinguish ‘medium-sized’ species that exploit highly disturbed and productive habitats from those of less disturbed and less productive situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Behre K-E, Jacomet S (1991) The ecological interpretation of archaeobotanical data. In: Zeist W van, Wasylikowa K, Behre K-E (eds) Progress in Old World palaeoethnobotany. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 81–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles M, Jones G, Hodgson JG (1997) FIBS in archaeoboany: functional interpretation of weed floras in relation to husbandry practices. J Arch Sci 24: 1151–1161

    Google Scholar 

  • Clapham AR, Tutin TG, Moore DM (1987) Flora of the British Isles. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H (1950) Landwirtschaftliche Pflanzensoziologie I: Unkrautgemeinschaften als Zeiger für Klima und Boden. Ulmer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H (1974) Zeigerwerte der Gefäßpflanzen Mitteleuropas. Scr Geobot 9: 1–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H, Weber HE, Düll R, Wirth V, Werner W, Paulissen D (1992) Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Scr Geobot 18: 1–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H (1996) Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen in ökologischer, dynamischer und historischer Sicht. Ulmer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Givnish TJ (1986) On the economy of plant form and function. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1974) Vegetation classification by reference to strategies. Nature 242: 344–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1979) Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP, Hodgson JG, Hunt R (1988) Comparative plant ecology: a functional approach to common British species. London, Unwire Hyman

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP, Thompson K, Hunt R, Hodgson JG, Cornelissen JHC, Rorison IH, Hendry GAF, Ashenden TW, Askew AP, Band SR, Booth RE, Bossard CC, Campbell BD, Cooper JEL, Davison AW, Gupta PL, Hall W, Hand DW, Hannah MA, Hillier SH, Hodkinson DJ, Jalili A, Liu Z, Mackey JML, Matthews N, Mowforth MA, Neal AM, Reader RJ, Reiling K, Ross-Fraser W, Spencer RE, Sutton F, Tasker DE, Thorpe PC, Whitehouse J (1997) Integrated screening validates primary axes of specialisation in plants. Oikos 79: 259–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier SH, Walton DWH, Wells DA (eds) (1990) Calcareous grasslands — ecology and management. Proceedings of a joint British Ecological Society/Nature Conservancy Council Symposium, 14–16 September 1987. Bluntisham, Huntingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman GC (1991) Phytosociology and ancient weed floras: taking account of taphonomy and changes in cultivation methods. In: Harris DR, Thomas KD (eds) Modelling Ecological Change. Institute of Archaeology, University College London, pp. 27–40

  • Hodgson JG (1989) The use of autecological information for selecting and managing plant materials used in habitat construction and the creation of species rich vegetation. In: Buckley GP (ed) Habitat reconstruction, transplantation and repair. Belhaven, London, pp 45–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson JG (1991a) Management for the conservation of plants with particular reference to the British flora. In: Spellerberg IF, Goldsmith FB, Morris MD (eds) The Scientific management of temperate communities for conservation. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 81–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson JG (1991b) The use of ecological theory and autecological datasets in studies of endangered plant and animal species and communities. Pirineos 138: 3–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson JG, Colasanti R, Sutton F (1995) Monitoring grasslands. English Nature Research Reports 156 (2 volumes). English Nature, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson JG, Grime JP, Hunt R, Thompson K (1995) The electronic comparative plant ecology. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzner W and Numata M (eds) (1982) Biology and ecology of weeds. Junk, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Hüppe J and Hofmeister H (1990) Syntaxonomische Fassung und Obersicht über die Ackerunkrautgesellschaften der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Ber Reinhold-Tüxen Gesell 2: 61–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones G (1992) Weed phytosociology and crop husbandry: identifying a contrast between ancient and modern practice. In: Pals JP, Buurman J, Veen M van der (eds) Festschrift for Professor van Zeist, Rev Palaeobot Palynol 73: 133–143

  • Küster H (1991) Phytosociology and archaeobotany. In: Harris DR, Thomas KD (eds) Modelling ecological change. Institute of Archaeology, University College London, London, pp. 17–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberdorfer E (1994) Pflanzensoziologische Exkursionsflora. Ulmer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Pott R 1992 Die Pflanzengesellschaften Deutschlands. Ulmer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Stace CA (1991) New flora of the British Isles. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson K, Hodgson JG, Grime JP, Rorison H, Band SR, Spencer RE (1993) Ellenberg numbers revisited. Phytocoenologia 23: 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Veen M van der (1992) Crop husbandry regimes: an archaeobotanical study of farming in northern England, 1000 BC-AD 500. Collis, Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bogaard, A., Hodgson, J.G., Wilson, P.J. et al. An index of weed size for assessing the soil productivity of ancient crop fields. Veget Hist Archaebot 7, 17–22 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01393414

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01393414

Key words

Navigation