Skip to main content
Log in

Critical thinking in distance education: Developing critical communities in an audio teleconference context

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Distance education has long been associated with independent study and delivery of prepackaged learning materials. These characteristics effectively deny distance education students the opportunity to participate in communities of inquiry and, perhaps, opportunities to develop their critical thinking skills. This paper reviews the theoretical impact of socially situated learning, critical thinking and their implications for distance education. It then presents the results from a study of learners' perception while enrolled in two different models of audio teleconferenced, university courses. The study reports quantitative results from a mail survey of these students and the qualitative results from interviews and classroom observations. The impact of the instructional design used by the delivering institution resulted in two distinct models of audio teleconference delivery with significant qualitative and quantitative differences in student perception. The paper concludes that learning communities, which support the development of critical thinking skills, can be created at a distance and that they provide a mechanism for improving the quality of higher level distance education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, (1994).Socially shared cognition in distance education: An exploration of learning in an audio teleconferencing context. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Calgary.

  • Biggs, J. (1990). ‘Teaching for learning outcomes’, in Entwistle N. (ed.),Handbook of Educational Ideas and Practice. London: Routledge, pp. 681–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. (1989).Developing critical thinkers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R.E. (1983). ‘Reconsidering research on learning from media’,Review of Educational Research 53, 445–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933).How we think. Boston: Heath and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1959). ‘My pedagogic creed’, in Dewey, J. (ed.),Dewey on education. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, pp. 19–32. (Original work published 1897)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dipardo, A. and Freedman, S. (1988). ‘Peer response groups in the writing classroom: Theoretic Foundations and new directions’,Review of Education Research 58 (2), 119–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N., and Entwistle, A. (1991). ‘Contrasting forms of understanding for degree examinations’,Higher Education 22, 205–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D.R. (1991). ‘Critical thinking and adult education: A conceptual model for developing critical thinking in adult learnes’,International Journal of Lifelong Education 10(4), 287–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D.R. (1993). ‘A cognitive constructivist view of distance education: An analysis of teachinglearning assumptions’,Distance Education 14, 199–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R. (1988). ‘Exploratory factor analysis’, in Neselroade, J. and Cattell, R. (ed.),Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D. (1991). ‘Instructional design for meaningful learning’,Instructional Science 20 (4), 289–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman, M. (1991).Thinking in Education. Cabridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPeck, J.E. (1981).Critical Thinking and Education. Oxford: Martin Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhr, T. (1991). ‘Atlas/ti: A prototype for the support of text interpretation’,Qualitative Sociology 14 (4), 349–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, D., Griffin, P. and Cole, M. (1989).The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in schools. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nipper, S. (1989). ‘Third generation distance learning and computer conferencing’, in Mason, R. and Kaye, A. (ed.),Mindweave: Communication, Computers and Distance Education. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (ed.), (1988).Improving Learning: New Perspectives. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (1992).Learning to Teach in Higher Education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L.B., Levine, J.M., and Teasley, S.D. (ed.), (1991).Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L.B. (1991). ‘Shared cognition: Thinking as social practice’, in Resnick, L.B., Levine, J.M., and Teasley, S.D., (ed.), (1991).Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1990).Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Developments in Social Context. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schell, N. and Branch, R. (1993). ‘The role of conversation and culture in the systematic design of instruction’,Educational Technology 23 (8), 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer-Bacon, B.J. (1993). ‘Caring and its relationship to critical thinking’,Educational Theory 43, 323–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L.S. (1978).Mind in Society, The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, T.D., Garrison, D.R. Critical thinking in distance education: Developing critical communities in an audio teleconference context. High Educ 29, 183–199 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383838

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383838

Keywords

Navigation