Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The parasitism of planktonic desmids by fungi

  • Abhandlungen
  • Published:
Österreichische botanische Zeitschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Desmids in Windermere, a lake in the English Lake District, are often parasitized by chytridiaceous or biflagellate phycomyceteus fungi.

Descriptions are given of the fungal parasites concerned, several of which cannot yet be named.

The relationship between the severity of parasitism, decrease in the number of live cells of desmids and increases in those of dead cells are described and illustrated.

There is evidence, from over twenty years of observations on desmids and their parasites, that the examples given here are not peculiar to the years concerned and that parasitism occurs similarly in other lakes.

Parasitism does not alter the overall seasonal pattern of periodicity of the desmids; it can have a marked effect on interspecific competition.

There is no evidence that desmids must be already adversely affected by other environmental conditions before severe parasitism can arise. Indeed the evidence available suggest that parasites commonly infect healthy and rapidly growing cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brook, A. J.:“Staurastrum paradoxum” Meyen and“S. gracile” Ralfs in the British freshwater plankton, and a revision of the“S. anatinum”-group of radiate desmids. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb.63, 589 (1959 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: The published figures ofStaurastrum paradoxum Meyen. Revue algol. N. S.4, 239 (1959 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: The varieties ofStaurastrum paradoxum Meyen — nomen dubium. Nova Hedwigia1, 431 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • Canter, H. M.: OnMyzocytium megastomum De Wildeman. Trans. Br. mycol. Soc.31, 80 (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Fungal parasites of the phytoplankton. III. Trans. Br. mycol. Soc.37, 111 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Fungal parasites of the phytoplankton. V.Chytridium isthmophilum sp. nov. Trans. Br. mycol. Soc.43, 660 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Studies on British chytrids. XVII. Species occurring on planktonic desmids. Trans. Br. mycol. Soc.44, 163 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Canter, H. M., andJ. W. G. Lund: Studies on plankton parasites. I. Fluctuations in the numbers ofAsterionella formosa Hass. in relation to fungal epidemics. New Phytol.47, 238 (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Studies on plankton parasites. III. Examples of the interaction between parasitism and other factors determining the growth of diatoms. Ann. Bot. N. S.15, 359 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Studies on plankton parasites. II. The parasitism of diatoms with special reference to lakes in the English Lake District. Trans. Br. mycol. Soc.36, 13 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: The periodicity of planktonic desmids in Windermere, England. Verh, int. Verein. theoret. angew. Limnol.16, 163 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: The importance of protozoa in controlling the abundance of planktonic algae in lakes. Proc. Linn. Soc. Lond.19, 203 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Karling, J. S.: Brazilian chytrids. IV. Species ofRozella. Mycologia36, 638 (1944).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, J. W. G.: Fungal diseases of plankton algae. In:Horton-Smith, C.: Biological aspects of the transmission of disease,19, 1957.

  • —: Primary production and periodicity of phytoplankton. Verh. int. Verein theoret. angew. Limnol.15, 37 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: The ecology of the freshwater phytoplankton. Biol. Rev.40, 231 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, J. W. G., E. D. Le Cren, andC. Kipling: The inverted microscope method of estimating algal numbers and the statistical basis of estimations by counting. Hydrobiologia11, 143 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, R. A.: Parasitic and saprophytic Phycomycetes which invade planktonic organisms. II. A new species ofDangeardia with notes on other lacustrine fungi. Mycologia50, 453 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pongratz, E.: De quelques champignons parasites d'organismes planctoniques du Léman. Schweiz. Z. Hydrol.28, 104 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, N.: Seasonal variations inStaurastrum paradoxum Meyen. New Phytologist39, 86 (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  • Skuja, H.: Taxonomische und biologische Studien über das Phytoplankton schwedischer Binnengewässer. Nova Acta R. Soc. Scient upsal. Ser. IV.16, (3) (1956).

  • Sparrow, F. K.: The aquatic Phycomycetes, exclusive of the Saprolegniaceae andPythium. Ann. Arbor (1943).

  • Teiling, E.: The desmid genusStaurodesmus. A taxonomic study. Ark. Bot. Ser.2, 6, 467 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ambleside

    Hilda M. Canter & J. W. G. Lund

Authors
  1. Hilda M. Canter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. W. G. Lund
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Written in honour of Professor Dr. L.Geitler to whom we owe so much for his investigations on freshwater algae.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Canter, H.M., Lund, J.W.G. The parasitism of planktonic desmids by fungi. Österr bot Z 116, 351–377 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01379634

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01379634

Keywords

Search

Navigation