Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnostic features in the characterisation of the root-nodule bacteria of legumes

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Annear, D. I., Freeze drying III. The preservation of bacteria. Labt. Pract.1956, 102–105 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Society for Bacteriology., Manual of Microbial Methods. 315 pages, McGraw Hill (1957).

  3. Bonnier, C., Classification et specificite de l'hote dans le genreRhizobium. Proc. VIth. Intern. Congr. Microbiol. Rome6, 325–327 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bowen, G. D., Specificity and nitrogen fixation in theRhizobium symbiosis ofCentrosema pubescens Benth. Queensland. J. Agr. Sci.16, 267–281 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burdon, K. L., Fatty material in bacteria and fungi revealed by staining dried, fixed preparations. J. Bacteriol52, 665–678 (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Christensen, W. B., Urea decomposition as a means of differentiatingProteus and paracolon organisms from each other and fromSalmonella andShigella types. J. Bacteriol52, 461–466 (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Foley, J. M. and Perret, C. J., Screening bacterial colonies for penicillinase production. Nature (Lond.)195 287–288 (1962).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fred, E. B., Baldwin, I. L., and McCoy, E., Root Nodule Bacteria and Leguminous Plants. 332 pages, University of Wisconsin Press (1932).

  9. Graham, P. H., A study on the application of serodiagnostic and computative methods to the taxonomy of the root-nodule bacteria of legumes. Ph. D. thesis, University of Western Australia (1963a).

  10. Graham, P. H., Antibiotic sensitivities of the root-nodule bacteria, Australian J. Biol. Sci.16, 557–559. (1963b).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Graham, P. H., Vitamin requirements of the root nodule bacteria of legumes. J. Gen. Microbiol.30, 245–248 (1963c).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gregory, K. F. and Allen, O. N., Physiological variations and host plant specificities of rhizobia isolated fromCaragana arborescens L. Can. J. Botany31, 730–738 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hofer, A. W., A characterisation ofBacterium radiobacter (Beijerinck and van Delden) Lohnis. J. Bacteriol.41, 193–224 (1941).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hunter, C. A. and Crecelius H. G., Hydrogen sulphide studies 1. Detection of hydrogen sulphide in cultures. J. Bacteriol.35, 185–196 (1938).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kleczkowska, J., Nutman, P. S., and Bond, G., Note on the ability of certain strains of rhizobia from peasand clover to infect each others host plants. J. Bacteriol.48, 673–675 (1944).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Koser, S. A., Utilisation of the salts of organic acids by the colon-aerogenes group. J. Bacteriol.8, 493 (1923).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kovaks, N., Identification ofPseudomonas pyocyanea by the oxidase reaction. Nature (Lond.)178, 703 (1956).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lange, R. T., Nodule bacteria associated with the indigenous Leguminosae of South-Western Australia. J. Gen. Microbiol.26, 351–359 (1961).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liefson, E., Morphological and physiological characteristics of the genusChromobacterium. J. Bacteriol.71, 393–400 (1956).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Neal, O. R. and Walker, R. H., Physiological studies onRhizobium IV. Utilisation of carbonaceous materials. J. Bacteriol30, 173–187 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Norris, D. O., Legumes and theRhizobium symbiosis. Empire J. Exp. Agr.24, 247–270 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Norris, D. O.,Rhizobium affinities of African species of Trifolium, Empire J. exp. Agric.27, 87–97, (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Parker, C. A., Anaerobiosis with iron wool. Australia J. Exp. Biol. Med. Sci.33, 33–37 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Paton, A. M., The role ofPseudomonas in plant disease. J. Applied. Bacteriol.23, 526–532.

  25. Pohlman, G. G., Changes produced in nitrogenous compounds byRhizobium meliloti andRhizobium japonicum. Soil Sci.31, 385–406 (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sneath, P. H. A., The application of computers to taxonomy. J. Gen. Microbiol.17, 201–226 (1957).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sneath, P. H. A., The construction of taxonomic groups. XIIth. Symp. Soc. gen. Microbiol. 289–332 (1962).

  28. Wilson, J. K., Over five hundred reasons for abandoning the cross inoculation groups of legumes. Soil Sci.58, 61–69 (1944).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zobell, C. E. and Feltham, C. B., A comparison of lead and iron as detectors of hydrogen sulphide produced by bacteria. J. Bacteriol.28, 169–176 (1934).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Graham, P.H., Parker, C.A. Diagnostic features in the characterisation of the root-nodule bacteria of legumes. Plant Soil 20, 383–396 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01373828

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01373828

Keywords

Navigation