Summary
Non-architects answered multiple-choice questions about depth, size, shape, texture, and conformation in exterior building scenes presented by manual rendering or video-computer techniques including a single viewpoint, multiple viewpoints, and animation. They also rated (a) confidence in their answers, (b) overall judgments of clarity, and (c) overall impressions of realism. The viewing time needed for judgments was also measured. Presentation technique did not affect the viewing time, but it did affect perceptual accuracy and ratings of confidence, clarity, and realism. Animation yielded higher ratings in all categories. It also produced the highest accuracy for depth perception, but the lowest accuracy for size and texture perception. The low accuracy for size and texture was exacerbated by high confidence in the wrong answers. Multiple viewpoints caused neither false confidence nor reduced accuracy in any category, and yielded the highest accuracy in two categories: size and texture. The combined effects on perception and metaperception (knowlege about one's own perceptual processes) suggest that animation creates the best overall impression and is the best for conveying depth information. However, multiple viewpoints are better than animation for conveying size and texture information. These results are discussed with respect to theories of perceptual representation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bach-y-Rita, P. (1972).Brain mechanisms in sensory substitution. New York: Academic Press.
Best, J. B. (1986).Cognitive Psychology, 2nd ed. St Paul, MN: West.
Bridgeman, B. (1991). Separate visual representations for perception and for visually guided behavior. In S. R. Ellis (Ed),Pictorial Communication in Virtual and Real Environments (pp. 316–327). London: Keller & Francis.
Brooks, H. G., II. (1988).A new communication model for architecture: Using video and 30 computer animated graphics (pp. 268). ACADIA, '88 Workshop Proceedings. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
Brown, A. L., & Smiley, S. S. (1977). Rating the importance of structural units of passages: A problem of metacognitive development.Child Development, 48, 18.
Brown, A. L., & Smiley, S. S. (1978). The development of strategies for studying texts.Child Development, 48, 1046–1088.
Committee on Vision, National Research Council (1986).Electronic travel aids: New direction for research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Danford, S., & Willems, E. P. (1975). Subjective responses to architectural displays a question of validity.Environment and Behavior, 7, 488–515.
Ellis, S. R., & Kaiser, M. K. (1990).Spatial displays and spatial instruments. Maryland: Erlbaum.
Estes, T. H., & Shebilske, W. L. (1980). Comprehension: Of what the reader seees of what the author says. In M. L. Kamil & S. J. Moe (Eds.) (pp. 99–104). Twenty-ninth yearbook of the National Reading Conference.
Feimer, N. R. (1984). Environmental perception: The effects of media, evaluative context, and observer sample.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4, 61–80.
Goldberg, D. W. (1986).Computer-based video graphics, Master Thesis. California Polytechnic State University, San Louis Obispo.
Goldman, G., & Zdepski, S. (1988).Abstraction and representation: Computer graphics and architectural design. ACADIA Workshop Proceedings 1988 (pp. 205–215). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
Goodale, M. A. (1988). Modularity in visuomotor control: From input to output. In Z. W. Pylyshyn (Ed.),Computational processes in human vision: An interdisciplinary perspective. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Co.
Hasell, M. J. (1983). Gaming simulation: A communication tool for architects and designers. Dissertation for Doctor of Architecture, The University of Michigan.
Heft, H. (1988). The vicissitudes of ecological phenomena in environment-behaviour research on the failure to replicate the angularity effect.Environment and Behavior, 20, 93–102.
Hershberger, R. G., & Cass, R. C. (1973). The adequacy of various media as representations of the design environment.Man-Environment Systems, 3, 371–372.
Hoyt, C. K. (1983). Practice: Are renderings still important in our electronic age?Architectural Record, 174, 35–39.
Ingle, D. J. (1973). Two visual systems in the frog.Science, 181, 1053–1055.
Ingle, D. J. (1982). Organization of visuomotor behaviors in vertebrates. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.),Analysis of visual behaviour. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Langendorf, R. (1986)Alternative models of architectural practice: The impact of computers — 1900 and 2000. ACADIA Workshop '86 Proceedings (pp. 9). Houston, TX: University of Houston.
Neeley, D. (1989). Animation in architecture: Which way are we headed?CADENCE, 4, 37–39.
Orland, B. (1987). Video imaging: Window to a new world.Computer Design Graphics World, 11, 18–24.
Pribram, K. H. (1988).A holonomic brain theory: Cooperativity and reciprocity in processing the configural and cognitive aspects of perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rasmussen, J., & Rouse, W. B. (1981).Human detection and diagnosis of systems Failures. New York: Plenum Press.
Robertson, B. (1990). The changing face of architectural presentations.Computer Graphics World, 13, 52–56.
Rubin, D. K. (1986). ENR news: Design liability rate soar to new record.Engineering News Record, 217, 12–13.
Schwarz, J. (1987). Seeing the future.American Way, 20, 10.
Shebilske, W. L. (1987a). An ecological efference mediation a theory of natural event perception. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.),Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 195–213). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Shebilske, W. L. (1987b). Baseball batters support an ecological efference mediation theory of natural event perception. In D. G. Bouwhuis, B. Bridgeman, D. A. Owens, W. L. Shebilske, & P. Wolff (Eds.),Sensorimotor interactions in space perception and action (pp. 117–131). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Shebilske, W. L. (1990). Visuomotor modularity, ontogeny, and training high-performance skills with spatial display instruments. In S. R. Ellis (Ed),Pictorial Communication in Virtual and Real Environments (pp. 305–315) London: Keller & Francis
Shuttleworth, S. (1980). The use of photographs as an environment presentation medium in landscape studies.Journal of Environmental Management, 11, 61–76.
Sirikasem, P. (1990). Video-computer imaging techniques: The effect of presentation by animation and series of selected viewpoints on communicative effectiveness of a design intent. Doctoral Dissertation submitted to Texas A & M University, July.
Ullman, S. (1979).The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wallach, H., & O'Connell, D. N. (1953). The kinetic depth effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 360–368.
Wingfield, A., & Byrner, D. L. (1981).The psychology of human memory. New York. Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sirikasem, P., Shebilske, W.L. The perception and metaperception of architectural designs communicated by video-computer imaging. Psychol. Res 53, 113–126 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01371819
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01371819