Abstract
This article reports a survey of two statewide abortion related organizations: Missouri Citizens for Life and the Abortion Rights Alliance (N=524). The two groups differed signficantly on 12 of 18 Rokeach terminal values and on eight of 13 NORC instrumental values. Salvation was the value which most successfully differentiated the two groups. The two groups were used to establish the construct validity of 18 abortion attitude items. Members of the two groups also differed significantly on each of 18 beliefs, indicating that they tend not only to accept assertions made by their own group but also to reject assertions made by the other group. Anti-abortion were more likely than pro-abortion respondents to expect an increase in restrictions on abortion five years from now. Proabortion respondents attributed significantly more pro-abortion sentiment to U.S. adults than did the anti-abortion respondents.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arney, W. & Trescher, W. Trends in attitudes toward abortion, 1972–1975.Family Planning Perspectives 1976,8 (No. 3), 117–124.
Blake, J. Abortion and Public opinion: The 1960–1970 decade.Science 1971,171 540–549.
Crano, W. & Brewer, M.Principles of research in social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1973.
Granberg, D. Authoritarianism and the assumption of similarity to self.Journal of Experimental Research in Personality 1972,6 1–4.
Granberg, D. Pro-life or reflection of conservative ideology? An analysis of opposition to legalized abortion.Sociology and Social Research 1978,62 414–429.
Granberg, D. Missouri Citizens for Life and the Abortion Rights Alliance: Initial Report of Comparisons of Two Opposing Social Movement Organizations. Unpublished manuscript, 1979.
Granberg, D. & Granberg, B. Abortion attitudes, 1965–1980: Trends and determinants.Family Planning Perspectives 1980,12(5), 250–261.
Granberg, D. & Jenks, R. Assimilation and contrast effects in the 1972 election.Human Relations 1977,30 623–640.
Marks, R. The effect of probability, desirability, and "privilege" on the stated expectations of children.Journal of Personality 1951,19 332–351.
Matlin, M & Stang, D.The pollyanna principle: Selectivity in language, memory, and thought. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Schenkman, 1978.
Mileti, D. & Barnett, L. Nine demographic factors and their relationship to attitudes toward abortion legalization.Social Biology 1972,19 43–50.
Rokeach, M.The nature of human values. New York: Free Press, 1973.
Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. The "false consensus effect": An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution process.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1977,13 279–301.
Rossi, A. Abortion laws and their victims.Transaction 1966,3 (No. 6), 7–12.
Rothbart, M. Assessing the likelihood of a threatening event: English Canadians' evaluations of the Quebec Separatist Movement.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1970,15 109–117.
Sherif, C. & Jackman, N. Judgments of truth by participants in collective controversy.Public Opinion Quarterly 1966,30 173–186.
Sherif, M. & Hovland, C.Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1961.
Sherif, M. & Sherif, C.Social psychology. New York: Harper & Row, 1969.
Singleton, R & Christiansen, J. The Construct Validation of a Shortform Attitudes Toward Feminism Scale.Sociology and Social Research 1977,61(3), 294–303.
Travers, R. A study in judging the opinions of groups.Archives of Psychology 1941, No. 266, 1–73.
Wallen, R. Individuals' estimates of group opinion.Journal of Social Psychology 1943,17 269–274.
White, R.Nobody wanted war: Misperception in Vietnam and other wars. Garden City, New York: Anchor Books, Doubleday, 1970.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The cooperation of Maureen McCarthy, Ann O'Donnell and Kathy Edwards is gratefully acknowledged. This research project benefited greatly from the assistance of Mary Harbourt, Kathy Dunsford, Sherry Kilgore, Barbara Breen, Janice Warneke, Lynn Taylor, Janice Sato, Beth Wellman Granberg, Karen Quiring, and Patricia Shanks. Data collection was funded by a grant from the Graduate Research Council of the University of Missouri—Columbia. The analysis was funded by National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Grant No. 1-HD-82834. Tom Smith of the NORC at the University of Chicago provided the marginals on the abortion items from the 1980 General Social Survey. Requests for reprints should be sent to Donald Granberg, Center for Research in Social Behavior, 111 E. Stewart Road, University of Missouri—Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Granberg, D. Comparison of pro-choice and pro-life activists: Their values, attitudes, and beliefs. Popul Environ 5, 75–94 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01367488
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01367488