Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Computer environments for the design of mechanical assemblies: A research review

  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reviews the most relevant literature dealing with the development of computer environments for the conceptual design of mechanical systems and assemblies. Selected literature is reviewed and discussed in relation to meeting the following requirements of such an environment: (1) representing and supporting top-down design, (2) representing and supporting multiple functional viewpoints, (3) representing functional knowledge, (4) representing spatial relationships and geometry, (5) maintaining consistency, and (6) providing analysis and other support. An appendix listing related readings is included.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Struss, P. (1987) Multiple Representation of Structure and Function. IFIP Working group 5.2, Expert Systems in Computer-Aided Design. Amsterdam: North-Holland

    Google Scholar 

  2. de Kleer, J. (1986) An assumption-based TMS. AI 28(1), 127–162

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schubert, L.K. (1979) Problems with parts. In: Proceedings of Sixth IJCAI, Tokyo, pp. 778–784

  4. Schubert, L.K. (1979) Representing and using knowledge about parts. Computing Science Technical Note, University of Alberta, Edmonton

    Google Scholar 

  5. Papalaskaris, M.A.; Schubert, L.K. (1981) Parts inference: Closed and semi-closed partitioning graphs. In: Proceedings of Seventh IJCAI, Vancouver, BC, pp. 304–309

  6. Katz, R.H.; Bhateja, R.; Chang, E.E.; Gedye, D.; Trijanto, V. (1987) Design version management. IEEE Des. Test February, pp. 12–22

  7. Popplestone, R.J.; Ambler, A.P.; Bellos, I. (1980) An interpreter for a language for describing assemblies. AI 14(1), 79–107

    Google Scholar 

  8. Popplestone, R.J. (1985) An Integrated Design System for Engineering. Preprints Third ISRR, Gouvieux, France

  9. Popplestone, R.J. (1987) The Edinburgh designer system as a framework for robotics. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1972–1977

  10. Popplestone, R.J.; Ambler, A.P.; Bellos, I. (1978) RAPT: A language for describing assemblies. Ind. Rob. 5(3), 131–137

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hobbs, J.R. (1985) Granularity. In: Proceedings of the Ninth IJCAI, Los Angeles, CA, pp. 1–4

  12. Freeman, P.; Newell, A. (1971) A model for functional reasoning in design. In: Proceedings of the Second IJCAI, Los Altos, CA, pp. 621–633

  13. Bowen, J. (1986) Automated configuration using a functional reasoning approach. In: Artificial Intelligence and its applications (Eds. A.G. Cohn; J.R. Thomas). New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 79–106

    Google Scholar 

  14. Collins, J.A.; Hagan, B.T.; Bratt, H.M. (1976) The failureexperience matrix—A useful design tool. Trans. ASME, Ser. B., J. Eng. Ind. 98, 1074–1079

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rinderle, J.R. (1987) Function and form relationships: A basis for preliminary design. Engineering Design Research Center, Paper no. EDRC-24-05-87, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA

    Google Scholar 

  16. Crossley, E. (1980) A “shorthand” route to design creativity. Mach. Des. April, pp. 96–100

  17. Koller, R. (1976) Konstruktions-Methode fuer den Maschinen-, Geraete- und Apparatebau, Berlin: Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fenves, S.J.; Baker, N.C. (1987) Spatial and functional representation language for structural design. Working Group 5.2. Expert Systems in Cumputer-Aided Design, IFIP 87

  19. Coyne, R.D.; Gero, J.S. (1985) Design knowledge and sequential plans. Environ. Plan. B 12(4), 401–418

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gips, J. (1974) Shape grammars and their uses. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stiny, G. (1975) Pictorial and Formal Aspects of Shape and Shape Grammars. Basel: Birkhauser Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lai, K.; Wilson, W.R.D. (1987) FDL: A language for function description and rationalization in mechanical design. In: Proceedings of Computers in Engineering Conference, New York, pp. 87–94

  23. Eastman, C.M. (1981) The design of assemblies. SAE Technical Paper No. 810197

  24. Wesley, M.A.; Lozano-Pérez, T.; Lieberman, L.I.; Lavin, M.A.; Grossman, D.D. (1980) A geometric modeling system for automated mechanical assembly. IBM J. Res. Dev. 24(1), 64–74

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lee, K.; Gossard, D.C. (1985) A hierarchical data structure for representing assemblies: Part 1. CAD 17(1), 15–19

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lee, K.; Andrews, G. (1985) Inference of the positions of components in an assembly: Part 2. CAD 17(1), 20–24

    Google Scholar 

  27. Light, R.; Gossard, D. (1982) Modification of geometric models through variational geometry. CAD 14(4), 209–214

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rocheleau, D.N.; Lee, K. (1987) System for interactive assembly modeling. CAD 19(2), 65–72

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ko, H.; Lee, K. (1987) Automatic assembling procedure generation from mating conditions. CAD 19(1), 3–10

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kitajima, K.; Yoshikawa, H. (1984) HIMADES-1: A hierarchical machine design system based on the structure model for a machine. CAD 16(6), 299–307

    Google Scholar 

  31. Takase, H.; Nakajima, N. (1985) A language for describing assembled machines. In: Design and Synthesis (Ed. H. Yoshikawa). North-Holland: Elsevier Science, pp. 471–476

    Google Scholar 

  32. Dixon, J.R.; Libardi, E.C.; Luby, S.C.; Vaghul, M.V.; Simmons, M.K. (1985) Expert systems for mechanical design: Examples of symbolic representations of design geometries. In: Applications of Knowledge Based Systems to Engineering Analysis and Design (Ed. C.L. Dym), ASME Publication No. AD-10, New York, pp. 29–46

  33. Luby, S.C.; Dixon, J.R.; Simmons, M.K. (1986) Designing with features: Creating and using a features data base for evaluation of the manufacturability of castings. In: Proceedings of the ASME Computer Engineering Conference, Chicago, IL, pp. 285–292

  34. Libardi, E.C.; Dixon, J.R.: Simmons, M.K. (1986) Designing with features: Design and analysis of extrusions as an example. ASME Paper No. 86-DE-4, Design Engineering Conference, Chicago, IL

  35. Cholvy, L.; Foisseau, J. (1983) Rosalie: A CAD object-oriented and rule-based system. In: Information Processing 83 (Ed. R.E.A. Mason). North-Holland: Elsevier Science, pp. 501–505

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lin, V.C.; Gossard, D.C.; Light, R.A. (1980) Variational geometry in computer aided design. In: Technical Document #23. MIT, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kela, A.; Perucchio, R.; Voelcker, H. (1986) Toward automatic finite element analysis. CIME July, pp. 57–71

  38. Bennet, J.; Creary, L.; Englemore, R.; Melosh, R. (1978) SACON: A knowledge-based consultant for structural analysis. Technical Report STAN-CS-78-699, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA

    Google Scholar 

  39. Avallone, E.A. et al. (Eds.) (1987) Mark's Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers. New York: McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  40. Angeles, J. (1982) Spatial Kinematic Chains: Analysis, Synthesis, Optimization. New York: Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  41. Joskowicz, L. (1987) Shape and function in mechanical devices. In: Proceedings of the Sixth AAAI Conference, Seattle, WA, pp. 611–615

  42. Lozano-Pérez, T. (1983) Spatial planning: A configuration space approach. IEEE Trans. Comp. C-32(2), 108–120

    Google Scholar 

  43. de Kleer, J. (1975) Qualitative and quantitative knowledge in classical mechanics. MIT Artificial Intelligence Technical Report #352, MIT, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  44. Faltings, B. (1986) A theory of qualitative kinematics in mechanisms. Department of Computer Science Report No. UIUCDCS-R-86-1274, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL

    Google Scholar 

  45. Forbus, K. (1980) Spatial and qualitative aspects of reasoning about motion. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on AI, Stanford University, August

  46. Forbus, K. (1981) A study of qualitative and geometric knowledge in reasoning about motion. MIT Artificial Intelligence Technical Report #615, MIT, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  47. Forbus, K. (1984) Qualitative process theory. MIT Artificial Intelligence Technical Report #789, MIT, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  48. Prenting, T.O.; Battaglin, R.M. (1964) The precedence diagram: A tool for analysis in assembly line balancing. J. Ind. Eng. 15(4), 208–213

    Google Scholar 

  49. Schwartz, J.T.; Sharir, M.; Hopcroft, J. (Eds.) (1987) Planning, geometry and complexity of robot motion. Ablex Series in Artificial Intelligence, Ablex Publishing

  50. Jones, C. (1986) A knowledge representation framework for automated engineering analysis. Master's thesis, Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA

    Google Scholar 

Appendix-Related Readings

  1. Brown, C.M. (1982) PADL-2: A technical summary. IEEE CG&A 2(2), 69–84

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chang, D. (1983) Automatic scaling of assemblies for computer aided design. Master's thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  3. Desa, S.; Nagurka, M.; Ghosal, A. (1987) Product redesign for performance, manufacture, and assembly: A rational methodology towards total system design. In: Proceedings International Conference on Engineering Design, Boston, MA, pp. 463–472

  4. Dyer, M.G.; Flowers, M.; Hodges, J. (1986) EDISON: An engineering design invention system operating naively. Int. J. AI Eng. 1(1), 36–44

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gelsey, A. (1987) Automated reasoning about machine geometry and kinematics. In: Proceedings of Third IEEE Conference on AI Applications, Orlando, FL, pp. 182–187

  6. Ishii, K.; Barkan, P. (1987) Design compatibility analysis—A framework for expert systems in mechanical system design. Computers in Engineering Conference, New York, pp. 95–102

  7. Katz, R.H. (1985) Information Management for Engineering Design. New York: Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lai, K. (1987) Mechanical design simplification using function description language. In: Proceedings of Fifteenth NAMRC, Bethlehem, PA

  9. Latombe, J.C. (1976) Artificial intelligence in computer-aided design: The TROPIC system. TR 125, Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, CA, pp. 61–108

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lee, K. (1983) Shape optimization of assemblies using geometric properties. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lieberman, L.I.; Wesley, M.A. (1977) AUTOPASS: An automatic programming system for computer controlled mechanical assembly. IBM J. Res. Dev. 21(4), 321–333

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maher, M.L. (1987) A knowledge-based approach to preliminary design synthesis. Engineering Design Research Center Paper No. EDRC-12-14-87, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mistree, F.; Muster, D. (1985) Design harmonization: A computer-based approach for design in the systems age. Optimization in computer-aided design (Ed. J.S. Gero). North-Holland: Elsevier Science, pp. 1–30

    Google Scholar 

  14. Murthy, S.S.; Addanki, S. (1987) PROMPT: An innovative design tool. In: Proceedings of Sixth AAAI Conference, Seattle, WA, pp. 637–642

  15. Pahl, G.; Bachmann, T. (1987) Systematic design helps CAD. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design (Ed. W.E. Eder). Boston, MA, pp. 504–511

  16. Pentland, A.P. (1987) Toward an ideal 3D CAD system. SIGCHI '87

  17. Rinderle, J.R.; Watton, J.D. (1987) Automatic identification of critical design relationships. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, Boston, MA, pp. 512–525

  18. Schubert, L.K.; Papalaskaris, M.A.; Taugher, J. (1983) Determining type, part, color, and time relationships. Computer October, pp. 53–60

  19. Stanfill, C. (1983) The decomposition of a large domain: Reasoning about machines. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference, pp. 387–390

  20. Tomiyama, T.; Yoshikawa, H. (1987) Extended general design theory. In: Design Theory for CAD (Eds. H. Yoshikawa and E.A. Warman). North-Holland: Elsevier Science, 95–124

    Google Scholar 

  21. Winston, P.H.; Binford, T.O.; Katz, B.; Lowry, M. (1983) Learning physical descriptions from functional definitions, examples, and precedents. In: Proceedings of the 1983 AAAI Conference, pp. 433–439

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Massachusetts, 01003, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA

    Eugene C. Libardi Jr. & John R. Dixon

  2. Artificial Intelligence Branch, GE Corporate Research and Development, Schenectady, New York

    Melvin K. Simmons

Authors
  1. Eugene C. Libardi Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John R. Dixon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Melvin K. Simmons
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Libardi, E.C., Dixon, J.R. & Simmons, M.K. Computer environments for the design of mechanical assemblies: A research review. Engineering with Computers 3, 121–136 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01349624

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01349624

Keywords

Search

Navigation