Skip to main content
Log in

Relations between grapevine replant disease and root colonization of grapevine (Vitis sp.) by fluorescent pseudomonads and endomycorrhizal fungi

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In pot experiments cuttings of grapevine rootstock cultivar ‘5C’ were grown on a soil from a grapevine nursery affected with replant disease (replant soil) and on a similar soil that had not been planted with grapevines before (non-replant soil). Plants were also inoculated with the vesicular-arbuscular (VA) mycorrhizal fungus,Glomus mosseae, or left without mycorrhizal fungus inoculation. Shoot and root growth, mycorrhization of roots and numbers of total aerobic bacteria and fluorescent pseudomonads on the rhizoplane of grapevines were determined at several sampling dates. On replant soil, numbers of fluorescent pseudomonads on the rhizoplane were higher compared to non-replant soil, before differences in shoot and root weight between replant and non-replant soil occurred. Without inoculation withG. mosseae, the mycorrhization of roots was much lower on replant soil (13%) than on non-replant soil (51%). On replant soil, inoculation withG. mosseae increased mycorrhization to 39% and increased shoot length, leaf area and shoot weight. The beneficial effect of VA-fungus inoculation on replant soil was not due to increased nutrient concentrations in leaves. On replant soil, the inoculation withG. mosseae reduced the number of fluorescent pseudomonads on rhizoplane of grapevine, while the numbers of total aerobic bacteria were not influenced by inoculation withG. mosseae. These results suggest a direct or indirect role of fluorescent pseudomonads in replant disease of grapevine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alström S and Burns R G (1989) Cyanide production by rhizobacteria as a possible mechanism of plant growth inhibition. Biol. Fertil. Soils 7, 232–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azcon-Aquilar C and Barea J M 1978 Effects of interactions between different culture fractions of ‘phosphobacteria’ andRhizobium on mycorrhizal infection, growth and nodulation ofMedicago sativa. Can. J. Microbiol. 24, 520–524.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker A W and Schippers B 1987 Microbial cyanide production in the rhizosphere in relation to potato yield reduction andPseudomonas spp.-mediated plant growth-stimulation. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 19, 451–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barclay G A and Crosse J E 1974 Populations of aerobic bacteria associated with the roots of apple and cherry plants. J. Appl. Bact. 37, 475–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barea J M, Bonis A F and Olivares J 1983 Interactions betweenAzospirillum and VA mycorrhiza and their effects on growth and nutrition of maize and ryegras. Soil Biol. Biochem. 15, 705–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bednarova M, Stanek M, Vancura V and Vesely D 1979 Microorganisms in the rhizosphere of wheat colonized by the fungusGaeumannomyces graminis var.tritici. Folia Microbiol. 24, 253–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann W and Neubert P 1976 Pflanzendiagnose und Pflanzenanalyse zur Ermittlung von Ernährungsstörungen und des Ernährungszustandes der Kulturpflanzen. Gustav Fischer Verlag Jena, 623–628.

  • Bunt J A and Mulder D 1973 The possible role of bacteria in relation to the apple replant disease. Mede. Fac. Landbouwwetenschap. Rijksuniv. Gent, 38, 1381–1385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr T J, Schroth M N and Suslow 1978 Increased potato yields by treatments of seedpieces with specific strains ofPseudomonas fluorescens andP. putida. Phytopathology 68, 1377–1383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell J N, Cass D D and Peteya D J 1987 Colonization and penetration of intact canola seedling roots by an opportunistic fluorescentPseudomonas sp. and the response of host tissue. Phytopathology 77, 1166–1173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catska V, Vancura V, Hudska, G and Prikryl Z 1982 Rhizosphere microorganisms in relation to the apple replant problem. Plant and Soil 69, 187–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis R M and Menge J A 1980 Influence ofGlomus fasciculatus and soil phosphorus on phytophthora root rot of citrus. Phytopathology 70, 447–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehne H W 1982 Interaction between vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant pathogens. Phytopathology 72, 1115–1119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehne H W and Schönbeck F 1979a The influence of endotrophic mycorrhiza on plant diseases. 1. Colonization of tomato plants byFusarium oxysporum f. sp.lycopersici. Phytopathol. Z. 95, 105–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehne H W and Schönbeck F 1979b The influence of endotrophic mycorrhiza on plant disease. 2. Phenolmetabolism and lignification. Phytopathol. Z. 95, 210–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhillion S S 1992 Dual inoculation of pretransplant stageOryza sativa L. plants with indigenous vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and fluorescentPseudomonas spp. Biol. Fertil. Soils 13, 147–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsherif M and Großmannn F 1990 Effects of different cropping systems on the occurence of fluorescent pseudomonads. J. Phytopathology, 130, 65–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson J K and Elliott L F 1985 Effects on winter wheat seedling growth by toxin-producing rhizobacteria. Plant and Soil 83, 399–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Garrido J M and Ocampo J A 1989 Effect of VA-mycorrhizal infection of tomato on damage caused by Pseudomonas syringae. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 21, 165–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner J M, Chandler J L and Feldman A W 1984 Growth promotion and inhibition by antibiotic-producing fluorescent pseudomonads on citrus roots. Plant and Soil 77, 103–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gericke S and Kurmies B 1952 Die kolorimetrische Phosphorbestimmung mit Ammonium-vanadat-molybdat und ihre Anwendung in der Pflanzenanalyse. Z. Pflanzenernaehr. Düng. Bodenkd. 59, 235–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovanetti M and Mosse B 1980 An evaluation for measuring vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots. New Phytol. 84, 489–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurusiddaiah S, Weller D M, Sarkar A, and Cook R J 1986 Characterization of an antibiotic produced by a strain ofPseudornonas fluorescens inhibitory toGaeumannomyces graminis var.tritici andPythium spp.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 29, 488–495.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halos P M, Zorilla R A 1979 Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae increase growth and yield of tomatoes and reduce infection byPseudomonas solanacearum. Philippines Agriculture 61, 309–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayman D S 1982 Influence of soils and fertility on activity and survival of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Phytopathology 72, 1119–1125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloepper J W and Schroth M N 1981 Plant growth- promoting rhizobacteria and plant growth under gnotobiotic conditions. Phytopathology 71, 642–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koske R E and Gemma J N 1989 A modified procedure for staining roots to detect VA-mycorrhizas. Mycol. Res. 92, 486–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari S K, Marschner H and George E 1990 Effect of Va-mycorrhizal fungi and rhizosphere organisms on root and shoot morphology, growth and water relations in maize. New Phytol. 116, 303–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishna K R, Balakrishna A N and Bagyaraj D J 1982 Interactions between a vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus andStreptomyces cinnamomeous and their effects on finger millet. New Phytol. 92, 401–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linderman R G 1988 Mycorrhizal interactions with the rhizosphere microflora: The mycorrhizosphere effect. Phytopathology 78, 366–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer J R and Linderman R G 1986a Response of subterranean clover to dual inoculation with vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and a plant growth-promoting bacterium,Pseudomonas putida. Soil Biol Biochem. 18, 185–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer J R and Linderman R G 1986b Selective influence on populations of rhizosphere or rhizoplane bacteria and actinomycetes by mycorrhizas formed byGlomus fasciculatum. Soil Biol. Biochem. 18, 191–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser L 1963 Versuche zur Bekämpfung der Rebenmüdigkeit. Mitt. Klosterneuburg, Serie A, 13, 149–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson B D and Burr T J 1983 Microflora associated with grape roots grown in grape nursery replant and non- replant soils. Phytopathology 73, 1345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulitz T C and Linderman R G 1989 Interactions between fluorescent pseudomonads and VA-mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 113, 37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrin R 1991: Mycorrhizes et Protection Phytosanitaire.In Les mycorrhizes des arbres et des plantes cultivés. Ed. D G Strullu. pp 93–130. Technique et Documentation Lavoisier, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosendahl C N and Rosendahl S 1990 The role of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza in controlling damping-off and growth reduction in cucumber caused byPythium ultimum. Symbiosis 9, 363–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sands D C and Rovira A D 1970 Isolation of fluorescent pseudomonads with a selective medium. Appl. Microbiol. 20, 513–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sands D C and Rovira A D 1971Pseudomonas fluorescens biotype G, the dominant fluorescent pseudomonas in south australian soils and wheat rhizospheres. J. Appl. Bact. 34, 264–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schippers B, Bakker A W and Bakker P A H M 1987 Interactions of deleterious and beneficial rhizosphere microorganisms and the effect of cropping practices. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 25, 339–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schippers B, Bakker A W, Bakker P A H M and Van Peer R 1990 Beneficial and deleterious effects of HCN-producing pseudomonads on rhizosphere interactions. Plant and Soil 129, 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith G S 1988 The role of phosphorus nutrition in interactions of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi with soilborne nematodes and fungi. Phytopathology 78, 371–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suslow T V and Schroth M N 1982 Role of deleterious rhizobacteria as minor pathogens in reducing crop growth. Phytopathology 72, 111–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waschkies C, Schropp A and Marschner H (1993) Relations between replant disease, growth parameters and mineral nutritional status of grapevines (Vitis sp.). Vitis 32, 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller D M 1983 Colonization of wheat roots by a fluorescent pseudomonad suppressive to take-all. Phytopathology 73, 1548–1533.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Waschkies, C., Schropp, A. & Marschner, H. Relations between grapevine replant disease and root colonization of grapevine (Vitis sp.) by fluorescent pseudomonads and endomycorrhizal fungi. Plant Soil 162, 219–227 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01347709

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01347709

Key words

Navigation