Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Commentary: Further comments on the insanity defense in the aftermath of the hinckley trial

  • Articles
  • Published:
Psychiatric Quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Erskine T: In the trial of James Hadfield,Re Hadfield, 27 St. Tr. 1281 (1800); quoted in Kuh RH. The insanity defense—An effort to combine law and reason.U. of Pa. Law Review 110:6 (Apr. 1962), 771.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The Insanity Defense: ABA and APA Proposals for Change.Mental Disability Law Reporter 7:2: 136–141, Mch.–Apr. 1983; Winter B: Insanity test: ABA backs limits on defense.Amer. Bar Assn. J. 69: 426, Ap 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  3. American Psychiatric Association Statement on the Insanity Defense. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Assn., 1–18; Jan. 1983,Am. J. Psychiatry 140:6:681–688, Jun. 1983.

  4. Robitscher J, Haynes AK: In defense of the insanity defense.Emory Law J. 31:1: 9–60, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Robitscher J: Tests of criminal responsibility: New rules and old problems.Land and Water Law Rev. III:1: 153, 172, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kelly M: 2 doctors differ on use of psychiatric testimony in courtroom.The Houston Post p. 7B, July 30, 1978.

  7. Diamond BL: FromM'Naghten to Currens, and beyond.Cal. Law Rev. 50:2: 189, 203, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  8. APA Statement,Op. cit. note 3, p. 8.

  9. Ibid., p. 17.

  10. Stone AA: Letter to author, Jan. 19, 1983.

  11. ABA Proposals,Op. cit. note 2, p. 136.

  12. New York Law School in Brief 4:8: 6, 1982.

  13. Roth LH: InMyths & Realities (Hearing Transcript of the National Commission on the Insanity Defense). Arlington, VA: National Assn. of Mental Health, p. 93; March 1983; Bonnie RJ: InHearings Before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Jul. 19 and 28, Aug. 2 and 4, 1982. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office (Serial No. J-97-126). pp. 256, 267; 1982. Bonnie RJ: The moral basis of the insanity defense.Amer. Bar Assoc. J. 69:194, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stone AA: InNewsweek, p. 57, May 24, 1982; Stone AA: The insanity defense on trial.Hosp. & Community Psychiat. 33:8 636, 640, 1982.

  15. Keenan JF: InNew York State Bar Association State Bar News 24:7, p. 5, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tanay E: InTime, p. 26, July 5, 1982.

  17. Showalter CR: Psychiatry and the capital sentencing process.Newsletter of Am. Acad. of Psychiat. & the Law 8:2, 22, 23, 1983: citing:Woodson v. North Carolina, 482 U.S. 280 (1976) (A process that accords no significance to relevant facets of the character and record of the individual offender or the circumstances of the particular offense excludes from consideration in fixing the ultimate punishment of death the possibility of compassionate or mitigating factors stemming from the diverse frailties of humankind);Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586 (1978) (The Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments require that the sentencer. . . not be precluded from considering, as amitigating factor, any aspect of a defendant's character or record and any of the circumstances of the offense that the defendant proffers as a basis for a sentence less than death);Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104 (1982) (The Supreme Court overturned the death sentence of a sixteen-year-old because the trial judge “refused, as a matter of law, to consider in mitigation the circumstances of the petitioner's unhappy upbringing and emotional disturbance....”)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Holmes OW: The path of the law.Harv. L. Rev. 10: 457, 1896; in Foster HH: A ‘Bill or Rights’ for children.Bull. Am. Acad. of Psychiat. & the Law 1:3: 199, 225, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  19. I am indebted to Anthony D. Oliver, M.D., Riverside, CA, for this description.

  20. Halpern AL: The fiction of legal insanity and the misuse of psychiatry.J. of Legal Med. 2:1: 18, 60, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See, for example, Weiner BA: APA statement on the insanity defense: A review and commentary.Newsletter of Am. Acad. of Psychiat. & the Law 8:1: 8–11, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rappeport JR: InHearings Before the Subcommittee on Criminal Law of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, June 24, 30 and July 14, 1982. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office (Serial No. J-97-122), p. 227, 1983; Taylor S; Insanity laws seen as hurting society.The New York Times, p. A15, July 1, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lauter D: Why insanity defense is breaking down.The National Law J, 1, May 3, 1982; Steadman HJ, Monahan J, Heartstone E, Davis S, Robins P: Mentally disordered offenders: A national survey of patients and facilities.Law and Human Behavior 6:1: 31, 33, 1982; Phillips MS: A demographic and epidemiological study of patients on warrants of the Lieutenant Governor in Ontario, May, 1983 (Ph.D. dissertation).

  24. Halpern AL: InHearings Before the Committee on the Judiciary Op. cit. note 13, p. 402.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See, for example, Hermann DHJ:The Insanity Defense: Philosophical, Historical and Legal Perspectives. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, Publishers, 1983, p. 3. Bonnie RJ:Op. cit. note 13.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Burger WE: Psychiatrists, lawyers, and the courts.Federal Probation 28: 9, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Anderson DC: Bargaining for justice.The New York Times, p. A22, August 27, 1982.

  28. Hinckley JW: The insanity defense and me.Newsweek p. 30, September 30, 1982.

  29. Halpern AL: Uncloseting the conscience of the jury—A justly acquitted doctrine.Psychiat. Quarterly 52:2: 144, 148, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bonnie RJ: InHearings Before the Committee on the Judiciary Op. cit. note 13, p. 268.

    Google Scholar 

  31. New York Daily News, p. 16, July 22, 1982.

  32. Morris, N: No tribute to our morality.Chicago Tribune, Sec. 1, p. 11, January 18, 1983.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. United Hospital, Port Chester, New York

    Abraham L. Halpern M.D. (chairman of the Department of Psychiatry)

  2. New York Medical College, USA

    Abraham L. Halpern M.D. (chairman of the Department of Psychiatry)

Authors
  1. Abraham L. Halpern M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Halpern, A.L. Commentary: Further comments on the insanity defense in the aftermath of the hinckley trial. Psych Quart 56, 62–69 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01324633

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01324633

Keywords

Search

Navigation