Skip to main content
Log in

Teaching community diagnosis to medical students

Evaluation of a case study approach

  • Teaching Reports
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A unique case study approach to training medical students in community diagnosis techniques was initiated at the Medical College of Ohio at Toledo. This paper describes the five elements of this teaching method: preliminary specification of target community and data base; group problem-solving requirement; specification of desired output; defined performance objectives; and regularly scheduled time for analysis. Experience with the case study method over two years was evaluated to identify specific strengths and weaknesses. The identified strengths include use of limited educational time to introduce community health problems, development of experience in a collegial team work setting, and specific awareness of the types of data useful to the analysis of community health service problems. Negative evaluations suggested that the method was not conducive to the development of skills in three areas: ability to establish the relative importance of health problems in communities; ability to identify an appropriate health system response to a community health problem from feasible alternatives; and ability to anticipate the community impact of health program modifications or improvements. Potential explanations for these deficiencies include: need for increased didactic support in the classroom for particular skill areas; need to establish a direct field experience in community diagnosis; inappropriateness of the data base used for evaluation of particular skills; and the probability that quantitative analysis, as used in this evaluation, may not be sufficient in and of itself to measure the outcome of a community diagnosis experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wray JD: Undergraduate and graduate education in community medicine. In W Lathem, A Newbery (eds):Community Medicine: Teaching, Research, and Health Care. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1970. Pp 155–184.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nelson AM: The frontiers of community medicine.Public Health Rep 89 49–52, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carnegie Commission on Higher Education:Higher Education and the Nation's Health. New York, McGraw Hill, 1970. Pp 45–47.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wilbur DL: An exercise in community medicine.Postgraduate Med 52 226–228, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marine W: Personal communication concerning departments of preventive and community medicine, 1978.

  6. Tapp JW, Deuschle KW: The community medicine clerkship.Milbank Mem Fund Q 47 (Pt.1): 411–447, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Deuschle KW, Bosch SJ, and Banta HD: The community medicine clerkship: A learner centered program.J Med Educ 47 931–938, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Donsky J, and Massad R: Community medicine in the training of family physicians.J Fam Pract 8 965–971, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Werblum MN, Dankers H, and Betton H: A Structured Experimental Curriculum in community Medicine.J Fam Practice 8 771–774, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lathem W: Community medicine: Success or failure.N Engl J Med 295 18–23, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lowenstein SR: A student's perspective on community medicine and the health crisis.J Med Educ 53 397–401, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Burke WM, Lukes JJ, and Manseu E: The preceptorship, and integral unit of the curriculum in community and family medicine,J Community Health 3 271–280, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stewart MM, Richstone N, and Greene MG: Community medicine clerkships in an applied research setting.J Med Educ 52 145–146, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Banks SA, Murphy AH, and Reynolds RC: The community health clerkship: Evaluation of a program.J Med Educ 48 560–564, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Weiler PG, and Clawson DK: Medical schools and public health departments: A new alliance for progress.J Med Educ 54 217–223, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Burke WM, Eckert NL, and Hays CW. An evaluation of the undergraduate medical curriculum, The Kentucky experiment in community medicine.JAMA 241 2726–2730, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Mr. Bair is Assistant Professor of Medicine, Division of Community Medicine, Medical College of Ohio at Toledo, 43699.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bair, C.W. Teaching community diagnosis to medical students. J Community Health 6, 54–64 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01324057

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01324057

Keywords

Navigation