Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Screening high-risk populations: A challenge to primary medical care

  • Policy
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The organizational, educational, and policy implications of screening high-risk populations are considered for five selected conditions: (a) the role of pregnancy-risk indices for the identification of high-risk women as it relates to the efficient use of perinatal and neonatal intensive care centers; (b) screening school-age children for conductive hearing loss, with emphasis on the role of complete otologic examination, threshold testing, and tympanometry in children with a history of recent or recurrent middle ear disease; (c) the efficacy of Pap smears in reducing mortality from cervical cancer; (d) the current status of clinical examination and mammography for detecting breast cancer; and (e) the problems inherent in diagnosing and treating hypertension. Because of the increasing costs of new technology that have not yet been adequately tested, health professionals bear an increasing obligation to require scientific evidence of the efficacy of the screening procedures before instituting large-scale programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Social Security Administration, Office of Research and Statistics (NL Worthington): National health expenditures, 1929–1974.Social Security Bulletin: Feb 1975.

  2. HEW begins to exert pressure for child screening.Washington Report on Medicine and Health (1414):2, Aug 5, 1974.

  3. Ingelfinger FJ: League for beleaguered internists.N Engl J Med 292589–591, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Holland WW: Taking stock.Lancet 21494–1497, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Health Resources Administration, National Center for Health Statistics: births, marriages, divorces, and deaths for June 1973.Monthly Vital Statistics Report 22(6): Aug 22, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kessner DM, Singer J, Kalk CE, et al:Contrasts in Health Status, Vol. 1,Infant Death: An Analysis by Maternal Risk and Health Care. Washington, DC, National Academy of Sciences, 1973. Pp 180, 139–143.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare:Vital Statistics of the United States, 1968, Vol. 2, Part A. Washington, D.C., 1969.

  8. Does this chemical cause cancer in man?Lancet 2:629–630, 1974.

  9. Cochrane AL:Effectiveness and Efficiency: Random Reflections on Health Services. London, Burgess & Son Ltd, 1972. P. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  10. World Health Organization:Mass Health Examination as a Public Health Tool. Technical Report A24. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sackett DL: Screening for early detection of disease: To what purpose?Bull NY Acad Med, in press.

  12. Gertman PM:An Evaluation of Policy-Related Research in the Field of Trade-Offs between Preventive and Primary Health Care. Washington, DC, National Science Foundation, 1974 (Contract No. NSF SSH-73-07917).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nesbitt REL, Aubry RH: high-risk obstetrics. II. Value of semiobjective grading system in identifying the vulnerable group.Am J Obstet Gynecol 103972–985, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Goodwin JW, Dunne JT, Thomas BW: Antepartum identification of the fetus at risk.Can Med Assoc J 10157–67, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Feldstein MS: A binary variable multiple regression method of analysing factors affecting perintal mortality and other outcomes of pregnancy.J Royal Statis Soc Series A: 61–73, 1966.

  16. Feldstein MS, Butler NR: Analysis of factors affecting perinatal mortality: A multivariate statistical approach.Br J Prev Soc Med 19128–134, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Feldstein MS: A method of evaluating perinatal mortality risk.Br J Prev Soc Med 19135–139, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kaminski M, Goujard J, Rumeau-Rouquette C: Prediction of low birthweight and prematurity by a multiple regression analysis with maternal characteristics known since the beginning of pregnancy.Int J Epidemiol 2(2): 195–204, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cochrane AL, Holland WW: Validation of screening procedures.Br Med Bull 273–8, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kessner DM, Kalk CE:Contrasts in Health Status, Vol. 2,A Strategy for Evaluating Health Services, Washington, DC, National Academy of Sciences, 1973. Pp 48–62, 90–91, 209, 155.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Snow CK, Herer G, Burke K: personal communication, March 18, 1975.

  22. Kessner DM, Snow CK, Singer J:Contrasts in Health Status, Vol. 3,Assessment of Medical Care for Children. Washington, DC, National Academy of Sciences, 1974. Pp 38–54.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Randal KJ: Cancer screening by cytology.Lancet 21303–1304, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Macgregor EJ, Teper S: Screening for cervical cancer.Lancet 11221, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Seller AH, McLerie EE: A note on trends in mortality from cancer of the cervix, Ontario and British Columbia, 1950–1971.Can J Public Health 64364–366, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Davis HJ, Jones HW: Population screening for cancer of the cervix with irrigation smears.Am J Obstet Gynecol 96605–618, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shapiro S, Strax P, Venet L, et al: Changes in 5-year breast cancer mortality in a breast cancer screening program. InSeventh National Cancer Conference Proceedings, American Cancer Society Inc., and National Cancer Institute. Philadelphia, J. B. Lippincott, 1973. Pp 663–678.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Irwig LM: Breast cancer.Lancet 21307–1308, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shapiro S: Screening for early detection.Bull NY Acad Med, in press.

  30. Boyes DA, Knowelden J, Phillips AJ: The evaluation of cancer control measures: Summary of the conclusion of UICC Symposium held in Sheffield.Br J Cancer 28105–107, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health:Report of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Task Force I to the Hypertension Information and Education Advisory Committee: Recommendations for a National High Blood Pressure Program Data Base for Effective Antihypertensive Therapy. DHEW Publication No. (NIH) 74-593. Bethesda, Md, National Institutes of Health, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sloan WC, Florey CduV, Acheson RM, et al: Epidemiologic methods in the study of blood pressure in relatives of toxemic primiparae.Am J Epidemiol 91553–561, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sackett DL: Cardiovascular disease.Lancet 21189–1191, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chasis H: Premature screening for hypertension.N Engl J Med 291258–259, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gibson ES, Mishkel M, Gent M, et al: Absenteeism from work among hypertensives: The DOFASCO-McMaster Heart Study Group. Presented at the American Heart Association Conference on Cardiovascular Disease Epidemiology, Tampa, Florida, February 1972.

  36. Jefferson T: Letter to William Charles Jarvis, September 28, 1820. In Bartlett J (ed):Familiar Quotations. Boston: Little Brown & Co, 1955. P 375b.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. David M. Kessner M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Dr. Kessner is with the Department of Community and Family Medicine, the University of Massachusetts Medical Center, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, Massachusetts 01605. Sponsored by the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association of Teachers of Preventive Medicine. Based on a presentation at the 102nd annual meeting of the American Public Health Association, New Orleans, Louisiana, October 21, 1974.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kessner, D.M. Screening high-risk populations: A challenge to primary medical care. J Community Health 1, 216–225 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323112

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323112

Keywords

Search

Navigation