Skip to main content
Log in

Traits, states, situations, and uncertainty

  • Published:
Journal of behavioral assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The shift of paradigm from psychodynamic therapy to behavior modification has changed the views of assessment and challenged traditional broad trait concepts. Behavioral assessment has used narrow, situation-specific trait tests, state self-report tests given in situations, and behavioral observations and performance ratings. Comparison of these types of measures are reported from a study of fear reactions in three situations. Narrow trait measures are generally more predictive of behavior than broad trait measures. State measures are even more predictive when given just before the performance. But only a sampling of such state measures can be used to define a trait because of the lower reliability of states. It is argued that behavior in situations is only predictable when an adequate number of behavioral samples is used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Borkovec, T. D., Weerts, T. C., & Bernstein, D. A. Assessment of anxiety. In A. R. Ciminero, K. S. Calhoun, & H. E. Adams (Eds),Handbook of behavioral assessment. New York: Wiley, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciminero, A. R. Behavioral assessment: An overview. In A. R. Ciminero, K. S. Calhoun, & H. E. Adams (Eds.),Handbook of behavioral assessment. New York: Wiley, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. The two disciplines of scientific psychology.American Psychologist, 1957,12 671–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, N. S., & Okada, M. A. A multidimensional measure of trait-anxiety: The S-R Inventory of General Trait Anxiousness.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1975,43 319–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, N. S., Hunt, J. McV., & Rosenstein, A. J. An S-R inventory of anxiousness.Psychological Monographs 1962,76 17(Whole No. 536).

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. Traits are alive and well. In D. Magnuson & N. S. Endler (Eds.),Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G.Eysenck personality inventory. San Diego: Educational and Industrial Testing Service, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geer, J. H. The development of a scale to measure fear.Behaviour Research and Therapy 1965,3 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfried, M. R., & Linehan, M. M. Basic issues in behavioral assessment. In A. R. Ciminero, K. S. Calhoun, & H. E. Adams (Eds.),Handbook of behavioral assessment. New York: Wiley, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P. J., & Lazovik, A. D. Experimental desensitization of a phobia.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1963,66 519–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • McReynolds, W. T. Anxiety as fear: A behavioral approach to one emotion. In M. Zuckerman & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.),Emotions and anxiety: New concepts, methods and applications. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellstrom, M., Jr., Cicala, G. A., & Zuckerman, M. General versus specific trait anxiety measures in the prediction of fear of snakes, heights, and darkness.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1976,44 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellstrom, M., Jr., Zuckerman, M., & Cicala, G. A. General versus specific traits in the assessment of anxiety.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1978,46 423–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W.Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. The interaction of person and situation. In D. Magnusson & N. S. Endler (Eds.),Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neary, R. S. The development and validation of a state measure of sensation seeking. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Delaware, 1975.

  • Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E.The state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI) test manual for form X. Palo Alto, Calif.: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasto, D. L. Self-report schedules and inventories. In A. R. Ciminero, K. S. Calhoun, & H. E. Adams (Eds.),Handbook of behavioral assessment. New York: Wiley, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. A. A personality scale of manifest anxiety.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1953,48 285–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walk, R. D. Self-ratings of fear in a fear-invoking situation,Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1956,52 171–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpe, J.Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpe, J., & Lang, P. J. A fear survey schedule for use in behavior therapy.Behaviour Research and Therapy 1964,2 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. The development of an affect adjective check list for the measurement of anxiety.Journal of Consulting Psychology 1960,24 457–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. General and situation-specific traits and states: New approaches to assessment of anxiety and other constructs. In M. Zuckerman & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.),Emotions and anxiety: New concepts, methods and applications. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum. 1976. a

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. Sensation seeking and anxiety, traits and states, as determinants of behavior in novel situations. In I. G. Sarason & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.),Stress and anxiety (Vol. 3). Washington, D.C.: Hemisphere, 1976. b

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. Development of a situation specific trait-state test for the prediction and measurement of affective responses.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1977,45 513–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. Sensation seeking. In H. London & J. Exner, Jr.Dimensions of Personality. New York: Wiley, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. Sensation seeking and risk taking. In C. E. Izard (Ed.),Emotions in personality and psychopathology. New York: Plenum Press, 1979. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M.Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1979. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., & Lubin, B.Manual for the multiple affect adjective check list. San Diego, California: Educational and Industrial Testing Service, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., & Mellstrom, M., Jr. The contributions of persons, situations, modes of responses and their interactions in self-reported reactions to hypothetical and real anxiety-inducing situations. In D. Magnusson & N. S. Endler (Eds.),Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., Persky, H., & Link, K. Relation of mood and hypnotizability: An illustration of the importance of the state versus trait distinction.Journal of Consulting Psychology 1967,31 464–470.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zuckerman, M. Traits, states, situations, and uncertainty. Journal of Behavioral Assessment 1, 43–54 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01322417

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01322417

Key words

Navigation