Skip to main content
Log in

Hospital reported complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy among Medicare and Medicaid patients

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to initiate a hospital-based case review of all laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed on Medicare and Medicaid patients in New York State in 1991 where there were one or more complications. Another purpose was to facilitate efforts by hospitals to monitor the performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy through an educational process of data-sharing.

There were 2,940 Medicare and 1,108 Medicaid cholecystectomies in New York State in 1991. Of these, 351 (11.9%) Medicare and 107 (9.7%) Medicaid patients were reported as having complications. The complication rate for Medicare patients was slightly lower than that observed (15.8%) in an epidemiologic study of Medicare patients in New York State who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy during the period January 1, 1990–June 30, 1991.

Both of these observed rates for Medicare patients are higher than the mean 6.0% complication rate reported for open cholecystectomy in the literature. These increased rates may in part be due to age related risk factors present among Medicare patients. The absence of age related risk factors may also largely account for the lower laparoscopic cholecystectomy complication rate (9.7%) observed among Medicaid patients.

The complication rate of 9.7% for Medicaid patients is similar to rates reported in other recent studies. The 11.9% complication rate for Medicare patients is higher than that reported in other recent studies. However, careful patient selection, the absence of age related risk factors, and greater surgical experience may account for the lower complication rates reported in some published series.

Overall, the coding of complications was found to be accurate. The coding of laparoscopic cholecystectomy was found to be slightly flawed.

Few of the adverse events leading to complications were deemed preventable by the hospitals. Surgeons often dealt with intraoperative problems by converting to a conventional open procedure.

Hospitals should continue to monitor their experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomies over time, and should provide educational feedback to their medical staffs regarding these findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stoney WS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: problems of rapid growth.S Med J, 84:681–683, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wolfe BM, Gardiner B, Frey CF: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a remarkable development.JAMA, 265:1573–1574, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chung RS, Broughan TA: The phenomenal growth of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review.Cleveland Clinic J Med, 59:186–191, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. NIH Consensus Statement on Gallstones and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Bethesda, MD, National Institutes of Health, 1993.

  5. Dubois F, Icard P, Berthelot G, et al: Collioscopic cholecystectomy: preliminary report of 356 cases.Ann Surg, 211:60–62, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. The Southern Surgeons Club: A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies.N Eng J Med, 324:1073–1078, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nenner RP, Imperato PJ, Alcorn CM: Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a geriatric population group.NY State J Med, 92:518–520, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Donahue JH, Farnell MB, Grant CS, et al: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Early Mayo Clinic experience.Mayo Clin Proc, 67:443–455, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pickleman J, Gonzalez RP: The improving results of cholecystectomy.Arch Surg, 121:930–934, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wilson P, Leese T, Morgan WP, et al: Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for “all comers.”Lancet, 338:795–797, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Raphael P. Nenner, M.D. is Vice President for Medical Affairs for the Island Peer Review Organization (IPRO), 1979 Marcus Ave, Lake Success, NY 11042; Pascal James Imperato, M.D. is Medical Director for Research, Development, and Epidemiology (IPRO) and Professor and Chairman, Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, State University of New York (SUNY), Health Science Center at Brooklyn, 450 Clarkson Ave, Brooklyn, NY 11203; Theodore O. Will, M.P.A., is Executive Vice President (IPRO); Harriet Starr, M.A. is Vice-President for Management Information Systems (IPRO); Harry S. Soroff, M.D., (IPRO) and Professor, Department of Surgery, State University of New York, Health Sciences Center at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794- 3399.

We wish to acknowledge the assistance of Gary B. Beringer, Dr. P.H., Director, Department of Data Analysis, Island Peer Review Organization (IPRO); John Zetsche, M.A., Research Analyst, and H. Peter Lee, S.B., Research Analyst, IPRO.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nenner, R.P., Imperato, P.J., Will, T.O. et al. Hospital reported complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy among Medicare and Medicaid patients. J Community Health 18, 253–260 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01321786

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01321786

Keywords

Navigation