Abstract
The results of both theories are compared. This gives the possibility to interpret terms of the one theory in terms of the other. The comparison suggests also that the ice lattice can be interpreted in two different ways as dipole lattice which have distinct values for the dielectric constant and of which both have physical significance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernal, J.D., Fowler, H.R.: J. Chem. Phys.1, 515 (1933)
Pauling, L.: J. Am. Chem. Soc.57, 2680 (1935)
Giauque, W.F., Stout, J.W.: J. Am. Chem. Soc.58, 1144 (1936)
Peterson, S.W., Levy, H.A.: Acta Cryst.10, 70 (1957)
Hubmann, M.: Z. Physik B32, 127 (1979)
Jaccard, C.: Phys. kondens. Materie3, 99 (1964)
Kirkwood, J.G.: J. Chem. Phys.7, 911 (1939)
Rahman, A., Stillinger, F.H.: J. Chem. Phys.57, 4009 (1972)
Nagle, J.F.: J. Chem. Phys.61, 883 (1974)
Nagle, J.F.: J. Glaciology21 (to appear 1978)
Onsager, L., Dupuis, M.: Electrolytes, (B. Pesce ed.), p. 27. Oxford-London-New York-Paris: Pergamon Press 1962
Coulson, C.A., Eisenberg, D.: Proc. Roy. Soc. A.291, 445 (1966)
Fröhlich, H.: Theory of Dielectrics, 2nd ed. pp. 37–40. London: Oxford University Press 1958
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hubmann, M. Polarization processes in the ice lattice. Z Physik B 32, 141–146 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320110
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320110