Abstract
In reference to two central concepts of Albert Camus' philosophy, that is, the absurd and the rebellion, this article examines to what extent hisThe Plague is of interest to medical ethics. The interpretation of this novel put forward in this article focuses on the main character of the novel, the physician Dr. Rieux. For Rieux, the plague epidemic, as it is described in the novel, implies an unquestioning commitment to his patients and fellow men. According to Camus this epidemic has to be understood as a symbol of the absurd. Unable to base his actions on a Christian, metaphysical value system, Rieux sees his commitment as a continuous rebellion against the fact of the absurd, which opposes him in the form of evil, suffering and death. As a physician, Rieux is therefore forced to adjust his actions to life in its immediacy, that is, the suffering of his patients. In this article, it will be shown that Rieux's attention to the “immediate” is of particular interest to medical ethics: Theother person in need, rather thanmy moral convictions, sets the norm.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Camus A.The Myth of Sisyphus. London: Penguin Books, 1975: 13.
Ibid: 19.
Ibid: 20.
Rath M.Albert Camus Absurdität und Revolte. Eine Einführung in sein Werk und die deutsche Rezeption. Frankfurt am Main: Haag & Herchen, 1984.
Camus A.The Myth of Sisyphus: 25.
Ibid: 26.
Ibid: 34.
Bondy F. Albert Camus und die Welt des Absurden.Schweizer Annalen 1946;3: 150–159.
Pieper A. Absurde Logik. Albert Camus' Grundlegung einer Philosophie des Lebens.Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 1974;28:433.
Camus A.The Myth of Sisyphus: 25: 111.
Camus A.The Plague. London: Penguin Books, 1960: 61.
Ibid: 45.
Ibid: 80.
Ibid: 107.
Ibid: 106.
Ibid: 207.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lengers, F.P. The idea of the absurd and the moral decision. Possibilities and limits of a physician's actions in the view of the absurd. Theoretical Medicine 15, 243–251 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01313340
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01313340