Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of the one-gramd-[14C]xylose breath test to the [14C]bile acid breath test in patients with small-intestine bacterial overgrowth

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In twelve patients with culture-proven bacterial overgrowth of the small intestine, the ability of a newly-developed one-gramd-[14C]xylose breath test to detect bacterial overgrowth was compared to that of the [14C]bile acid breath test. All patients manifested excessive production of breath14CO2 after the administration of one gram [14C]xylose, with 83% of the patients being abnormal within the first hour of testing. In contrast, during the [14C]bile acid breath test, four of the twelve patients had no period of excessive14CO2 production (above the 95% confidence range of controls). Nutrient malabsorption (fat, cobalamin, xylose) was seen with both true-positive and false-negative bile acid breath tests. The one gram [14C]xylose breath test, utilizing a substrate with more predominant absorption in the proximal small intestine and which can be catabolized by Gram-negative aerobic bacteria, appears to have a greater degree of sensitivity and specificity than the bile acid breath test in detecting the presence of small-intestine bacterial overgrowth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Donaldson RM Jr: Small bowel bacterial overgrowth. Adv Intern Med 16:191–212, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  2. King CE, Toskes PP: Small intestine bacterial overgrowth. Gastroenterology 76:1035–1055, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  3. Northfield TC, Drasar B, Wright JT: Value of small intestinal bile acid analysis in the diagnosis of the stagnant loop syndrome. Gut 14:341–347, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  4. Egger G, Kessler JI: Clinical experience with a simple test for the detection of bacterial deconjugation of bile salts and the site and extent of bacterial overgrowth in the small intestine. Gastroenterology 64:545–551, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fromm H, Hofmann AF: Breath test for altered bile-acid metabolism. Lancet 2:621–625, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sherr HP, Sasaki Y, Newman A, Banwell JG, Wagner HN, Hendrix TR: Detection of bacterial deconjugation of bile salts by a convenient breath analysis technic. N Engl J Med 285:656–661, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fromm H, Thomas PJ, Hofmann AF: Sensitivity and specificity in tests of distal ileal function: Prospective comparison of bile acid and vitamin B12 absorption in ileal resection patients. Gastroenterology 64:1077–1090, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  8. Toskes PP, King CE, Spivey JC, Lorenz E: Xylose catabolism in the experimental rat blind loop syndrome: Studies including use of a newly developed14C-d-xylose breath test. Gastroenterology 74:691–697, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  9. King CE, Toskes PP, Spivey JC, Lorenz E, Welkos S: Detection of bacterial overgrowth in the human small intestine by means of a14C-d-xylose breath test. Gastroenterology 77:75–82, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  10. Winchell HS, Stahelin H, Kusubov N, Slanger B, Fish M, Pollycove M, Lawrence JH: Kinetics of CO2−HCO3 in normal adult males. J Nucl Med 11:711–715, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  11. Scholander PF: Analyzer for accurate estimation of respiratory gases in one-half cubic centimeter samples. J Biol Chem 167:235–250, 1947

    Google Scholar 

  12. James OFW, Agnew JE, Bouchier IAD: Assessment of the14C-glycocholic acid breath test. Br Med J 3:191–195, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  13. Turnberg LA, Anthony-Mote A: The quantitative determination of bile salts in bile using thin-layer chromatography and a 3 α hydroxy-steroid dehydrogenase. Clin Chim Acta 24:253–259, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hofmann AF: Thin-layer absorption chromatography of free and conjugated bile acids on silicic acid. J Lipid Research 3:127–128, 1962

    Google Scholar 

  15. Randerath K:In Thin-Layer Chromatography, 1968, Academic Press, New York, pp. 143–144

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pedersen L, Arnfred T, Thaysen EH: Rapid screening of increased bile acid deconjugation and bile acid malabsorption by means of the glycine-1-(14C) cholylglycine assay. Scand J Gastroenterol 8:665–672, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  17. Scarpello JHB, Sladen GE: Appraisal of the14C-glycocholate acid test with special reference to the measurement of fecal14C excretion. Gut 18:742–748, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lauterburg BH Newcomer AD, Hofmann AF: Clinical value of the bile acid breath test. Evaluation of the Mayo Clinic experience. Mayo Clin Proc 52:227–233, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  19. Farivar S, Fromm H, Schindler D, Schmidt FW: Sensitivity of bile acid breath test in the diagnosis of bacterial overgrowth in the small intestine with and without the stagnant (blind) loop syndrome. Dig Dis Sci 24:33–40, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  20. Metz G, Gassull MA, Drasar BS, Jenkins DJA, Blendis LM: Breath-hydrogen test for small intestinal bacterial colonisation. Lancet 1:668–669, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lennette EH, Spaulding EA, Truant JP: Manual of Clinical Microbiology. American Society for Microbiology. Washington, D.C., 2nd edition, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hill M, Drasar BS: Degradation of bile salts by human intestinal bacteria. Gut 9:22–27, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lewis R, Gorbach S: Modification of bile acids by intestinal bacteria. Arch Intern Med 130:545–548, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  24. Goldstein F, Mandle RJ, Schaedler RW: The blind loop syndrome and its variants: Microbiologic aspects of diagnosis and treatment. Am J Gastroenterol 60:255–264, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  25. Goldstein F: Mechanisms of malabsorption and malnutrition in the blind loop syndrome. (Editorial) Gastroenterology 61:780–784, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  26. King C, Toskes P: A caveat—Endogenous CO2 production increases during nonfasting carbon isotope breath tests. (abstract). Gastroenterology 74:1049, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hofmann AF, Lauterburg BH: Breath test with isotopes of carbon: Progress and potential. J Lab Clin Med 90:405–411, 1977

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dr. King is the recipient of a Research Associate Award from the Veterans Administration. During the performance of these studies Dr. Toskes was the recipient of a Clinical Investigator Award from the Veterans Administration.

Supported in part by Grant #RR-82 from the National Institutes of Health.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

King, C.E., Toskes, P.P., Guilarte, T.R. et al. Comparison of the one-gramd-[14C]xylose breath test to the [14C]bile acid breath test in patients with small-intestine bacterial overgrowth. Digest Dis Sci 25, 53–58 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01312733

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01312733

Keywords

Navigation