Skip to main content
Log in

Overview of clinical safety with misoprostol

  • Part 4: Clinical and Pharmacological Actions of Misoprostol, a PGE1 Analog
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The number of subjects who had participated in completed clinical trials of misoprostol as of 1 May 1984 was 2272. Of this number 1549 subjects were exposed to misoprostol doses as high as 400 μg q.i.d. and for periods up to eight weeks. In ongoing trials subjects are receiving as much as 300 μg q.i.d. for up to 12 weeks, or 400 μg daily for up to one year. Five large controlled multicenter multicountry clinical trials have been conducted with misoprostol, including double-blind placebo-controlled comparisons of misoprostol in two duodenal ulcer studies and one gastric ulcer study, and double-blind comparisons of two doses of misoprostol and cimetidine in duodenal ulcer and gastric ulcer studies. In the placebo-controlled trials the only complaint clearly associated with misoprostol therapy in a meaningful number of patients was diarrhea, defined as any change in bowel habits whether or not this included true watery diarrhea, The incidence of diarrhea was higher with misoprostol 200 μg (13.1% of 107 subjects) and misoprostol 100 μg (9.5% of 199 subjects) than with placebo (3.8% of 314 subjects). This relatively high incidence of diarrhea is offset by the fact that only four subjects had withdrawn from studies worldwide because of diarrhea. It appears that compliance was excellent. In the cimetidine-controlled studies, diarrhea and related complaints were greater with misoprostol 200 μg (5.6% of 337 subjects) than with misoprostol 50 μg (3.0% of 328 subjects) or with cimetidine 300 μg q.i.d. (1.8% of 327 subjects). There were no unusual differences in the results of laboratory analyses, including tests of liver function, between misoprostol and placebo groups. Cimetidine caused an increase in serum creatinine in many cases, but this has been reported in the literature. Misoprostol has proven to be an extremely safe and well tolerated drug for the treatment of peptic ulcer disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brand DL, Roufail WM, Thomson ABR, Tapper EJ: Misoprostol, a synthetic PGE1 analog, in the treatment of duodenal ulcers: A multicenter double-blind study. Dig Dis Sci 30 (Nov Suppl.):147S-158S, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sontag SJ, Mazure PA, Pontes JF, Beker SG, Dajani EZ: Misoprostol in the treatment of duodenal ulcer: a multicenter double-blind placebo controlled study. Dig Dis Sci 30 (Nov Suppl.):159S-163S, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  3. Agrawal NM, Saffouri B, Kruss DM, Callison DA, Dajani EZ: Healing of benign gastric ulcer: A placebo-controlled comparison of two dosage regimens of misoprostol, a synthetic analog of prostaglandin E1. Dig Dis Sci 30 (Nov Suppl.):164S-170S, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nicholson PA: A multicenter international controlled comparison of two dosage regimens of misoprostol and cimetidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcer in out-patients. Dig Dis Sci 30 (Nov Suppl.):171S-177S, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shield MJ: Interim results of a multicenter international comparison of misoprostol and cimetidine in the treatment of out-patients with benign gastric ulcers. Dig Dis Sci 30 (Nov Suppl.):178S-184S, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  6. Guidelines for Detection of Hepatotoxity Due to Drugs and Chemicals.In US Department of Health, Education and Welfare. CS Davidson, CM Leevy, EC Chamberlayne (eds). NIH Publication, October 1979, 7:79–313

  7. Five-week safety assessment study (JA 0013) conducted for Japanese registration, at the Central Institute for Experimental Animals, Kawasaki City, Japan, 1982

  8. A Study of the Effect of Misoprostol (SC-29333) on Platelet Aggregation, Respiratory and Endocrine Function in Volunteer Subjects. G.D. Searle and Co. Report No. E35-83-06-069, 1983

  9. A Multiclinic, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study of Prophylactic Misoprostol Therapy for Prevention of Recurrence of Duodenal Ulcers. G.D. Searle and Co. Protocol No. N63-83-02-031, 1983

  10. Thirteen-Week Oral Toxicity Study of Stabilized SC-29333 in Dogs (Hazleton Laboratories, America Inc., Vienna VA) PS-81C, 1585A, 1981

  11. Stejskal R, Roubier C, Regnier B: One Year Oral Toxicity Study of Stabilized SC-29333 in the Dog. Department of Product Safety Assessment, Searle Research and Development, PS-83F-0052A, 1983

  12. Goldman H, Antonioli DA: Mucosal biopsy of the esophagus, stomach and proximal duodenum. Hum Pathol 13:423–448, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  13. Oohara T, Sadatsuki H, Kaminishi M, Mitarai Y: Simple alkaline treatment induces intestinal metaplasia in the stomach of rats. Path Res Pract 175:365–372, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  14. Morson BC, Sobin LH, Grundmann E, Johansen A, Nagayo T, Serck-Hanssen A: Precancerous conditions and epithelial dysplasia of the stomach. J Clin Pathol 33:711–721, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grundmann E, Schlake W: Histology of possible precancerous stages in the stomach.In Gastric Cancer, C Herford, P Schlag (eds). Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag 1979, pp 72–82.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Misoprostol versus Placebo in the Treatment of Gastric Ulcer. G.D. Searle and Co. Protocol No. MED-81-02-001, 1981

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herting, R.L., Clay, G.A. Overview of clinical safety with misoprostol. Digest Dis Sci 30 (Suppl 11), 185S–193S (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01309407

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01309407

Keywords

Navigation