Skip to main content
Log in

Toward a theory of spontaneous law

  • Articles
  • Published:
Constitutional Political Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Legal scholars have long recognized the significance of strategic behavior when considering how legal rules affect, individuals. In the principal applications of game theory to the law, legal rules have been analyzed as corrective devices for game inefficiencies. Law promotes what individuals cannot spontaneously achieve or helps them avoid the traps of strategic social interaction. The logic of this argument, however, needs to be reversed if one wishes to use game theory to explain the spontaneous emergence of law. The challenge is to apply the sophisticated tools of game theory to an appraisal of spontaneous sources of law and to consider the incentive structure of the originating environment as well as the possible role of strategic behavior in affecting the equilibrium outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alchian A. A. (1950) “Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory.”Journal of Political Economy 58: 211–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. M. (1981) “The Emergence of Cooperation Among Egoists.”American Political Science Review 75: 306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. M. (1984)The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, B. L. (1988) “Legal Evolution in Primitive Societies.”,Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 144: 772–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, B. L. (1989) “The Spontaneous Evolution of Commercial Law.”Southern Economic Journal 55: 644–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, B. L. (1990)The Enterprise of Law: Justice Without the State. San Francisco: Pacific Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, B. L. (1992) “Customary Law as a Social Contract: International Commercial Law”.Constitutional Political Economy 3: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, H. J., and Dasser, F. J. (1990) “The ‘New’ Law Merchant and the ‘Old’: Sources, Content, and Legitimacy.” In: Carbonneau, T. E. (ed.)Lex Mercatoria and Arbitration: A Discussion of the New Law Merchant. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Transnational Juris Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, K., and Samuelson, L. (1994) “An Economist's Perspective on the Evolution of Norms.”Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics. 150: 45–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., and Richerson, P. J. (1992) “Punishment Allows the Evolution of Cooperation (or Anything Else) in Sizable Groups.”Ethology and Sociobiology 13: 171–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., and Richerson, P. J. (1994) “The Evolution of Norms: An Anthropological View.”Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 150: 72–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1975)The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1979) “General Implications of Subjectivism in Economics.” In:What Should Economists Do? Liberty Press.

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1991) “The Foundations for Normative Individualism.” In:The Economics and the Ethics of Constitutional Order. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1994) “Choosing What to Choose.”Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 150: 123–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M., and Tullock, G. (1962)The Calculus of Consent. Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charney, J. I. (1986) “The Persistent Objector Rule and the Development of Customary International Law.”British Yearbook of International Law 56: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooter, R. D. (1992) “Against Legal Centrism.”California Law Review 81: 425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooter, R. D. (1994) “Structural Adjudication, and the New Law Merchant: A Model of Decentralized Law.”International Review of Law and Economics 14: 215–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Amato, A. (1971)The Concept of Custom in International Law. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, R. (1984)International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law (vol. 2), New York: Oceana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, M. A. (1988)The Nature of the Common Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellickson, R. C. (1991)Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellickson, R. C. (1994) “The Aim of Order Without Law.”Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 150: 97–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D., and Maskin, E. (1986) “The Folk Theorem in Repeated Games with Discounting or with Incomplete Information.”Econometrica 54: 533–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, L. L. (1969)The Morality of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, D. (1986)Morals by Agreement Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greif, A. (1989) “Reputation and Coalitions in Medieval Trade: Evidence on the Maghribi Traders.”Journal of Economic History 49: 857.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968) “The Tragedy of the Commons.”Science 162: 1243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C. (1955) “Cardinal Welfare Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility.”Journal of Political Economy 63: 315.

    Google Scholar 

  • hart, H. L. A. (1961)The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1955)The Counterrevolution of Science. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1960)The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1967) “The Results of Human Action But Not of Human Design.” In:Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1989)The Fatal Conceit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, J. (1982) “Evolutionary Models in Economics and the Law: Cooperation Versus Conflict Strategies.”Research in Law and Economics 4: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, M. W. (1993)An Introduction to International law. New York: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelsen H. (1939) “Théorie du Droit International Coutumier.”Revue Internationale de la Théorie du Droit (New Series) 1: 263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelsen, H. (1945)General Theory of Law and the State, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelsen, H. (1952)Principles of International Law New York: Rinehart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B., and Leffler, K. (1981) “The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance.”Jounal of Political Economy 89: 615–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kronman, A. (1985) “Contract Law and the State of Nature.”Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 1: 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, H. (1982) “The Prisoners', Dilemma in the Invisible Hand: An Analysis of Intrafirm Productivity.”AEA Papers and Proceedings 72: 92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D. (1988) “Utility-Enhancing Consumption Constraints.”Economics and Philosophy 4: 69–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D. (1992) “Adam Smith and the Texas A&M Rats.” In:The Economic Ideas of Ordinary People: From Preferences to Trade. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1969)Convention: A Philosophical, Study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard, University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mateesco, N. M. (1947)La Coutume dans les Cycles Juridiques Internationaux. Paris: A. Pedone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muris, T. J. (1981) “Opportunistic Behavior and the Law of Contracts.”,Minnesota Law Review 65: 521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parisi, F. (1996) “Law, as a Voluntary Enterprise.” In: Ratnapala, S., and Moens, G. (eds.)The Jurisprudence of Liberty. Butterworth.

  • Pollock, F. (1929)First Book of Jurisprudence (6th ed.) London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. (1987) “Prisoner's Dilemma.” In:The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971)A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ress, G. (1994) “Ex Ante Safeguards Against Ex Post Opportunism in International Treaties: Theory and Practice of International Public Law.”Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 150: 279–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmond, J. W. (1966)Jurisprudence (12th ed.). London: Sweet and Maxwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schotter, A. (1981)Economic Theory of Social Institutions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, K. E. (1974) “Bounded Rationality and Social Norms.”Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 150: 315–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R. (1978) “The Chain-Store Paradox.”Theory and Decision 9: 127–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1979) “Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory.” In: Hahn, F., and Hollis, M. (eds.)Philosophy and Economic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shubik, M. (1987)Game Theory in the Social Sciences: Concepts and Solutions (4th ed.). Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1776)An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: A. Strahan and T. Cadell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns, M. L. (1994) “The Misguided Renaissance of Social Choice.”Yale Law Journal 103: 1219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straffin, P. (1980) “The Prisoner's Dilemma.”UMAP Journal 1: 101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trakman, L. E. (1983)The Law Merchant: The Evolution of Commercial Law. Littleton, CO: Rotham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, A. W. (1950) “A Two-Person Dilemma.” Unpublished manuscript reprinted in: Straffin, P. (1980) “The Prisoner's Dilemma,”UMAP Journal 1: 101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1987)Private Wants, Public Means: An Economic Analysis of the Desirable Scope of Government. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunkin, G. I. (1961) “Remarks on the Juridical Nature of Customary Norms in International Law.”California Law Review 49: 419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulmann-Margalit, E. (1977)The Emergence of Norms. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanberg, V. J. (1993) “Rational Choice, Rule-Following and Institutions: An Evolutionary Perspective.” In: Gustafson, B., Knudsen, C., and Maki, U. (eds.)Rationality, Institutions and Economic Methodology (pp. 171–200). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, K. I. (1982) “Can Democratic Society Reform Itself: The Limits of Constructive Change.” George Mason University Working Paper.

  • Wagner, R. E. (1992) “Crafting Social Rules: Common Law vs. Statute Law, Once Again.”Constitutional Political Economy 3: 381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walden, R. M. (1977) “The Subjective Element in the Formation of Customary International Law.”Israel Law Review 12: 344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978)Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1983) “Credible Commitments: Using Hostages to Support Exchange.”American Economic Review 73: 519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfke, K. (1993)Custom in Present International Law (2d ed.). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parisi, F. Toward a theory of spontaneous law. Constit Polit Econ 6, 211–231 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01303403

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01303403

Keywords

Navigation