Skip to main content
Log in

Does the choice of outcome scale influence prognostic factors for lumbar disc surgery?

A prospective, consecutive study of 121 patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From January to June 1994, we operated conventionally on 121 consecutive herniated lumbar disc patients as part of a prospective study. We analysed general data, case histories, neurological findings on admission and all data from imaging investigations and therapy. In addition, all patients received a questionnaire based on the Low Back Outcome Score. Most of the patients (93%) were followed-up for 1 year postoperatively in the same manner. On the Prolo Scale, we obtained a good result in 70%; 76% had a good Low Back Outcome Score. Predictive factors are different for different outcome scales. The preoperative duration of pain, the preoperative duration of paresis and smoking seem to be general predictive factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abramowitz JN, Neff RS (1991) Lumbar disc surgery: results of the prospective lumbar discectomy study of the joint section on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves of the American Association of the Neurological Surgeons and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Neurosurgery 29:301–308

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dauch WA, Fasse A, Brucher K, Bauer BL (1994) Pradiktoren des Behandlungserfolges nach mikrochirurgischer Operation lumbaler Bandscheibenvorfälle. Zentralbl Neurochir 55: 144–155

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davis RA (1994) A long-term outcome analysis of 984 surgically treated hemiated lumbar discs. J Neurosurg 80: 415–421

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dunnett CW (1964) New tables for multiple comparisons with a control. Biometrics 20:482–491

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dvorak J, Gauchat MH, Valach L (1988a) The outcome of surgery for lumbar disc herniation. 1. A 4–17 years' follow-up with emphasis on somatic aspects. Spine 13: 1418–1422

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dvorak J, Valach L, Fuhrimann P, Heim E (1988b) The outcome of surgery for lumbar disc herniation. 11. A 4–17 years' follow-up with emphasis on psychosocial aspects. Spine 13:1423–1427

    Google Scholar 

  7. Frymoyer JW, Gordon SL (1989) Research perspectives in low-back pain. Report of 1988 workshop. Spine 14: 1384

    Google Scholar 

  8. Games PA, Howell JF (1976) Pairwise multiple comparison procedures with unequal n's and/or variances: A Monte Carlo study. J Ed Stat 1: 113–125

    Google Scholar 

  9. Greenough CG (1993) Results of treatment of lumbar spine disorders. Effects of assessment techniques and confounding factors. Acta Orthop Scand [Suppl] 251:126–129

    Google Scholar 

  10. Greenough CG, Fraser RD (1992) Assessment of outcome in patients with low-back pain. Spine 17: 36–41

    Google Scholar 

  11. Howe J, Frymoyer JW (1985) The effects of questionnaire design on the determination of end results in lumbar spinal surgery. Spine 10: 804–805

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hurme M, Alaranta H (1987) Factors predicting the result of surgery for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine 12:933–938

    Google Scholar 

  13. Musson B (1993) Patient-related factors predicting the outcome of decompressive surgery. Acta Orthop Scand [Suppl] 251:69–70

    Google Scholar 

  14. Junge A, Dvorak J, Ahrens ST (1995) Predictors of bad and good outcomes of lumbar disc surgery. Spine 20: 460–468

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lewis PJ, Weir BK, Broad RW, Grace MG (1987) Long-term prospective study of lumbosacral discectomy. J Neurosurg 67:49–53

    Google Scholar 

  16. Manniche C, Asmussen KH, Vinterberg H, Rose-Hansen EB, Kramhøft J, Jordan A (1994) Analysis of preoperative prognostic factors in first-time surgery for lumbar disc herniation, including Finneson's and modified Spengler's score system. Dan Med Bull 41: 110–115

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nygaard ØP, Rommer B, Trumpy JH (1994) Duration of symptoms as a predictor of outcome after lumbar disc surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 128: 53–56

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pappas CT, Harrington T, Sonntag VK (1992) Outcome analysis in 654 surgically treated lumbar disc herniations. Neurosurgery 30:862–866

    Google Scholar 

  19. Prolo DJ, Oklund SA, Butcher M (1986) Toward uniformity in evaluating results of lumbar spine operations A paradigm applied to posterior lumbar interbody fusions. Spine 11: 601–606

    Google Scholar 

  20. Soerensen LV, Mors O (1989) A twoyear prospective follow-up study of the outcome after surgery in patients with slipped lumbar disk operated upon for the first time. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 96:94–99

    Google Scholar 

  21. Weber H (1983) Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine 8: 131–140

    Google Scholar 

  22. Weir BKA (1979) Prospective study of 100 lumbosacral discectomies. J Neurosurg 50:283–289

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woertgen, C., Holzschuh, M., Rothoerl, R.D. et al. Does the choice of outcome scale influence prognostic factors for lumbar disc surgery?. Eur Spine J 6, 173–180 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01301432

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01301432

Key words

Navigation