Skip to main content
Log in

Control metaphors in the modelling of economic learning and decision-making behaviour

  • Published:
Computational Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Learning is represented in economic models either as a process of estimating equations which are known to be correct representations of the environment or as a process of sampling from a known probability distribution. It is arguably more natural to represent leaning as the specification of equations or other relationships in conditions where information processing capacity is not sufficiently powerful as to enable agents to identify such global characteristics of the whole information set as the moments of a probability distribution. Techniques drawn from the literature on machine learning and on knowledge-based systems are coming into use as tools for modelling learning in such conditions. In this paper I describe the key differences between the older and newer approaches to the modelling of learning and decision-making in terms of two metaphors: the menu and the agenda. Two agenda-type algorithms—a genetic algorithm and a production system — are applied to a simple economic model to show that they imply quite different descriptions of learning and decision-making. Moreover, the production system finds the optimal behaviour orders of magnitude faster than the genetic algorithm because — it is suggested — it is the better descriptor of actual strategic decision-making behaviour in normally complex economic conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, P.W., K.J. Arrow and D. Pines, 1988,The Economy as an Evolving Complex System Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. Brian, 1988, ‘Self Reinforcing Mechanisms in Economics’ in Anderson, Arrow and Pines, 1988, pp. 9–31.

  • Chandler, Alfred D., 1977,The Visible Hand Harvard University Press, Cambridge,MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, Alfred D., 1962,Strategy and Structure MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Paul R., 1985,Heuristic Reasoning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach Pitman Advanced Publishing Program, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, Paul R., 1975, ‘Clio and the Economics of QWERTY’,American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, pp. 332–7.

  • Davis, Randall, 1982, “Teiresias: Applications of Meta-Level Knowledge”, Part 2 of Davis and Lenat, 1982.

  • Davis, Randall and Douglas B. Lenat, 1982,Knowledge-based Systems in Artificial Intelligence McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, Huw D. and Scott Moss, 1992, ‘Evaluating Competitive Strategies’,International Journal of Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance & Management, forthcoming

  • Forrest, Stephanie and Melanie Mitchell, 1993, ‘What Makes a Problem hard for a Genetic Algorithm? Some Anomalous Results and Their Explanation’Machine Learning 13, 2–3, pp. 285–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Stephen and Anthony Garratt, 1992, ‘Model Consistent Learning and Regime Switching’, London Business School Centre for Economic Forecasting Discussion Paper 02-92.

  • Holland, John H., 1975,Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, John H., 1986, ‘Escaping Brittleness: The Possibilities of General-Purpose Learning Algorithms Applied to Parallel Rulebased Systems’ in Michalski,et al., 1986, pp. 593–623.

  • Marimon, R., E. Mcgrattan and T. Sargent, 1989, ‘Money as a Medium of Exchange in an Economy with Artificially Intelligent Agents’Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 14, 329–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalski, R.S., J.G. Carbonell and T.M. Mitchell (1986),Machine Learning II Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos.

  • Moss, Scott, 1989, ‘Equilibrium and Evolution in Modelling Competitive Behaviour: an Artificial Intelligence Approach’, University of Manchester: mimeo.

  • Newell, Alan and Herbert A. Simon, 1972,Human Problem Solving Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Nathan, 1969, ‘The Direction of Technical Change: Mechanisms and Focusing Devices’,Economic Development and Cultural Change, pp. 1–24.

  • Tanimoto, Steven L., 1987,The Elements of Artificial Intelligence Computer Science Press, Rockville MD.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moss, S. Control metaphors in the modelling of economic learning and decision-making behaviour. Comput Econ 8, 283–301 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01299735

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01299735

Key words

Navigation