Skip to main content
Log in

Stable barrier-projection and barrier-Newton methods in linear programming

  • Published:
Computational Optimization and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present paper is devoted to the application of the space transformation techniques for solving linear programming problems. By using a surjective mapping the original constrained optimization problem is transformed to a problem in a new space with only equality constraints. For the numerical solution of the latter problem the stable version of the gradient-projection and Newton's methods are used. After an inverse transformation to the original space a family of numerical methods for solving optimization problems with equality and inequality constraints is obtained. The proposed algorithms are based on the numerical integration of the systems of ordinary differential equations. These algorithms do not require feasibility of the starting and current points, but they preserve feasibility. As a result of a space transformation the vector fields of differential equations are changed and additional terms are introduced which serve as a barrier preventing the trajectories from leaving the feasible set. A proof of a convergence is given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barnes, E., “A variation on Karmarkar's algorithm for solving linear programming problems,”Math. Programming, Vol. 36 (1986), pp. 174–182.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bacciotti, A., “Local stability of nonlinear control systems,”Series on Advances in Mathematics for Applied Sciences, Vol. 8 (1992). World Scientific Publishing Co. Ptc. Ltd., Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bayer, D.A. and Lagarias, J.C., “The nonlinear geometry of linear programming. Affine and projective scaling trajectories,”Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., Vol. 314, No. 2 (1989), pp. 499–526.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dikin, I., “Iterative solution of problems of linear and quadratic programming,”Sov. Math. Dokl., Vol. 8, (1967), pp. 674–675.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Evtushenko, Yu., “Two numerical methods of solving nonlinear programming problems,”Sov. Math. Dokl., Vol. 15, No. 2 (1974), pp. 420–423.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Evtushenko, Yu.,Numerical Optimization Techniques. Optimization Software, Inc. Publications Division, New York, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Evtushenko, Yu. and Zhadan, V., “Numerical methods for solving some operations research problems,”U.S.S.R. Comput. Maths. Math. Phys., Vol. 13, No. 3 (1973), pp. 56–77.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Evtushenko, Yu. and Zhadan, V., “A relaxation method for solving problems of non-linear programming,”U.S.S.R. Comput. Maths. Math. Phys., Vol. 17, No. 4, (1978), pp. 73–87.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Evtushenko, Yu. and Zhadan, V., “New approaches in optimization techniques,” in:Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, 143, System Modelling and Optimization, Proc. of the 14th IFIP Conference, ed. H.-J. Sebastian and K. Tammer, Leipzig: Springer-Verlag, pp. 23–37, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Evtushenko, Yu., Zhadan, V., “Barrier-projective and barrier-Newton numerical methods in optimization (the nonlinear programming case),” Computing Center of the USSR Academy of Sciences,Reports on Comput. Math., 1991 (in Russian).

  11. Evtushenko, Yu. and Zhadan, V., “Barrier-projective and barrier-Newton numerical methods in optimization (the linear programming case),” Computing Center of the USSR Academy of Sciences,Reports on Comput. Math., 1992 (in Russian).

  12. Evtushenko, Yu. and Zhadan, V., “The space transformation techniques in mathematical programming,” in:Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, 180, System modelling and Optimization, Proc. of the 15th IFIP Conference, P. Kall (ed.), Zurich: Springer-Verlag, pp. 292–300, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Herzel, S., Recchioni, M.C., and Zirilli, F., “A quadratically convergent method for linear programming,”Linear Algebra and its Applications, Vol. 152 (1991), pp. 255–289.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kallio, M., “On gradient projection for linear programming,”Working Paper 94, Yale School of Organization and Management, 1986.

  15. Karmarkar, N., “A new polynomial-time algorithm for linear programming,”Combinatorica, No. 4 (1984), pp. 373–395.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Luenberger, D.,Introduction to Linear and Nonlinear Programming, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rosen, J., “The gradient projection method for nonlinear programming, part 1, linear constraints,”SIAM J. Applied Math., Vol. 8 (1960), pp. 181–217.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tanabe, K., “A geometric method in nonlinear programming,”Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 30, No. 2 (1980), pp. 181–210.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vanderbei, R., Meketon, M., and Freedman, B., “A modification of Karmarkar's linear programming algorithm,”Algorithmica, 1 (1986), pp. 395–407.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wei., Zi-Luan, “An interior point method for linear-programming,”Journal of Computing Mathematics, Oct. (1987), pp. 342–350.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dedicated to Professor George B. Dantzig on the occasion of his eightieth birthday.

Research was supported by the grant N93-012-450 from Russian Scientific Fund.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Evtushenko, Y.G., Zhadan, V.G. Stable barrier-projection and barrier-Newton methods in linear programming. Comput Optim Applic 3, 289–303 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01299205

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01299205

Keywords

Navigation