Skip to main content
Log in

Economic and political competition in neoclassical and evolutionary perspective

  • Articles
  • Published:
Constitutional Political Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neoclassical welfare economics still looms large in the discipline of public choice. Particularly, by constructing analogies of political competition fundamental shortcomings of “old” neoclassical paradigms found their way into a “new” theory of political economy. Especially the failure to deal with the problem of limited knowledge and with the role of institutions obscured fundamental differences between political and economic systems of coordination and control. Hence, I propose a non-neoclassical perspective, using Hayekian concepts like “competition as a discovery procedure” or “spontaneous order” to develop an alternative agenda for many fields of public choice. I shall first outline a critique of neoclassical equilibrium settings in economics and in similarly constructed models of democracy. Then various properties of economic and political institutions, the competition of ideas and institutional competition among jurisdictions will be discussed in an evolutionary perspective. Not surprisingly, these applications reveal some similarities to central themes of constitutional political economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aranson, P. H. (1989) “The Democratic Order and Public Choice.” In: Brennan, G., and Lomasky, L. E. (eds.)Politics and process-New Essays in Democratic Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1951)Social Choice and Individual Values. New York and London: Wiley & Sons, Capman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajoit, G. (1988) “Exit, voice, loyalty... and apathy—Les réactions individuelles au mécontentement.”Revue française de sociologie 29: 325–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B. (1975) “On Analogy.”Political Studies 23: 208–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, N. P. (1979)Hayek's Social and Economic Philosophy. London and Basingstroke: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1958) “Competition and Democracy.”The Journal of Law and Economics 1: 105–09.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1976)The Economic Approach to Human Behaviour. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S., (1983) “A Theory of Competition among Pressure Groups for Political Influence.”The Quarterly Journal of Economics 98 (3): 371–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bish, R. L. [1988 (1987)] “Federalism: a Market Economics Perspective.” In: Gwartney, J. D., and Wagner, R. E. (eds.)Public Choice and Constitutional Economics. Greenwich and London: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G., and Buchanan, J. M. (1980)The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G., and Buchanan, J. M. (1984) “Voter Choice: Evaluating Political Alternatives.”American Behavioral Scientist 28: 185–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G., and Buchanan, J. M. (1985)The Reason of Rules-Constitutional Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton, A. (1978) “Economics of Representative Democracy.” In: The Institute of Economic Affais (ed.)The Economics of Politics. London.

  • Breton, A. (1993) “Toward a Presumption of Efficiency in Politics.”Public Choice 77: 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1954) “Individual Choice in Voting and the Market.”The Journal of Political Economy 62: 334–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1972) “Politics, Policy, and the Pigovian Margins.” In: Buchanan, J. M. and Tollison, R. D. (eds.)Theory of Public Choice. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1990) “The Domain of Constitutional Economics.”Constitutional Political Economy 1(1): 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1990)Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, Mass. and London: The Belknap Pres of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. (1969) “Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint”The Journal of Law and Economics 12(1): 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. (1990) “Amenity Potential, Indivisabilities, and Political Competition.” In: Alt, J. E., and Shepsle, K. A. (eds.)Perspectives on Positive Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957)An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1991) “Social Values and Democracy.” In: Monroe, K. R. (ed.)The Economic Approach to Politics—A Critical Reassessment of the Theory of Rational Action. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, P. (1991)Democracy, Bureaucracy and Public Choice-Economic Explanations in Political Science. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye, T. R., (1990)American Federalism-Competition Among Governments. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1984)Ulysses and the Sirens, Rev. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1988)The Moral Dimension-Toward a New Economics. New York: The Free Press and London: Collier Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S. (1970) “Models of Perfect Competition and Pure Democracy.”Kyklos 23: 736–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1953) “The Methodology of Positive Economics.” In: Id.Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furubotn, E. G., and Richter, R. (1994) “The New Institutional Economics: An Assessment.”Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 150(1):1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A., (1937) “Economics and Knowledge.”Economica IV: 28–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1945) “The Use of Knowledge in Society.”The American Economic Review 35: 519–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. [1948 (1946)] “The Meaning of Competition.” In: Id.Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. [1979 (1952)]The Counterrevolution of Science-Studies on the Abuse of Reason, 2nd ed. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1960)The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. [1978 (1968)] “Competition as a Discovery Procedure.” In: Id.New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1973a)Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol. 1: Rules and Order. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. [1978 (1973b)] “Economic Freedom and Representative Government.” In: Id.New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1976)Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol. 2: The Mirage of Social Justice. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1979)Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol. 3: The Political Order of a Free People. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1988)The Fatal Conceit—The Errors of Socialism. Bartley, W. W., III (ed.) London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1970)Exit, Voice, and Loyalty-Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. [1981 (1976)] “Exit and Voice: Some Further Distinctions.” In: Id.Essays in Trespassing-Economics to Politics and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1982)Shifting Involvements-Private Interest and Public Action. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, S. (1988) “Gag Rules or the Politics of Omission.” In: Elster, J., and Stagstad, R. (eds.)Constitutionalism and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppmann, E. (1988) “Meinungswettbewerb als Entdeckungsverfahren.” In: Id.Wirtschaftsordnung und Wettbewerb. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. [1978 (1970)]A Treatise of Human Nature. 2nd edition with Text Revised and Variant Readings by P. H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. [1987 (1777a)] “That Politics may be Reduced to a Science.” In: Id.Essays—Moral, Political and Literary. Edited and with a Foreword, Notes and Glossary by E. F. Miller, rev. ed. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. [1987 (1777b)] “On the First Principles of Government.” In: Id.Essays—Moral, Political and Literary. Edited and with a Foreword, Notes and Glossary by E. F. Miller, rev. ed. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. [1978 (1777c)] “On the Independency of Parliament.” In: Id.Essays—Moral, Political and Literary; Edited and with a Foreword, Notes and Glossary by E. F. Miller, rev. ed. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasay, A. de (1991)Choice, Contract, Consent: A Restatement of Liberalism. London: The Institute of Economic Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. J. (1981)The European Miracle: Environments, Economics and Geopolitics in the History of Europe and Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchgässner, G., and Pommerehne, W. W. (1993) “Low-cost Decisions as a Challenge to Public Choice.”Public Choice 77(1): 107–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. (1973)Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kliemt, H. (1986) “The Veil of Insignificance.”European Journal of Political Economy 2: 333–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koford, K. (1993) “The Median and the Competitive Equilibrium in One Dimension.”Public Choice 76:273–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koslowski, P. (1987a) “Individual Liberty and Democratic Decision-Making. Editor's Introduction.” In: Id.Individual Liberty and Democratic Decision-Making—The Ethics, Economics, and Politics of Democracy. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koslowski, P. (1987b) “Market and Democracy as Discourses. Limits to Discoursive Social Coordination.” In: Id.Individual Liberty and Democratic Decision-Making—The Ethics, Economics, and Politics of Democracy. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann, L. M. (1970)The Legacy of Max Weber: London: Heinemann

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1936)Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leoni, B. (1961)Freedom and the Law: Princeton: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, L. von (1949)Human Action—A Treatise on Economics. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W. C. (1984a) “Schumpeter and Public Choice, Part I: Precursor of Public Choice?”Public Choice 42 (1): 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W. C. (1984b) “Schumpeter and Public Choice, Part II: Democracy and the Demise of Capitalism: The Missing Chapter in Schumpeter.”Public Choice 42 (2): 161–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, K. R. (1991) (ed.)The Economic Approach to Politics—A Critical Reassessment of the Theory of Rational Action. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenstern, O. [1976 (1935)] “Perfect Foresight and Economic Equilibrium.” Translated by F. H. Knight. In: Schotter, A. (ed.)Selected Economic Writings of Oskar Morgenstern. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D. C. (1989)Public Choice II—A Revised Edition of Public Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mussler, W., and Wohlgemuth, M. (1994) Institutionen im Wettbewerb—Ordnungstheoretische Anmerkungen zum Systemwettbewerb in Europa. Forthcoming in Oberender, P., and Streit, M. E. (eds)Die euröpäischen Arbeitsmärkte im Systemwettbewerb. Baden-Baden; Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W. A. (1971)Bureaucracy and Representative Democracy. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990)Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1993) “What Do We Mean be Rationality?”Public Choice 77: 159–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965)The Logic of Collective Action—Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1982)The Rise and Decline of Nations—Economic Growth, Stagflation and Social Rigidities. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasour, E. C. Jr. (1992) “Economists and Public Policy: Chicago Political Economy versus Conventional Views.”Public Choice 74: 153–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (1990) “How Efficient is the Voting Market?”The Journal of Law & Economics 33 (1): 27–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennock, J. R. (1989) “The Justification of Democracy.” In: Brennan, G., and Lomasky, L. E. (eds.)Politics and process—New Essays in democratic thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1990)The Comparative Advantage of Nations. London and Basingstoke: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N., and Birdzell, L. E. Jr. (1986)How the West Grew Rich: The Economic Transformation of the Industrial World. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. (1987)The Theory of Democracy Revisited, Part One: The Contemporary Debate. Chatham: Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. [1976 (1942)]Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 5th ed. London, Boston and Sydney: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackle, G. L. S. (1966) “Policy, Poetry and Success.”The Economic Journal 76: 755–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackle, G. L. S. (1972)Epistemics & Economics—A Critique of Economic Doctrines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soto, H. de (1990)The Other Path. The Invisible Revolution in the Third World. Foreword by Vargas Llosa. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. (1961) “The Economics of Information.”The Journal of Political Economy 69: 213–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. (1968) “Competition.”International Encyclopedia of Social Science Vol. 3: 181–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streit, M. E. (1987) “Economic Order and Public Policy—Market, Constitution and the Welfare State.” In: Pethig, R., and Schlieper, U. (eds.)Efficiency, Institutions, and Economic Policy. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streit, M. E. (1992a) “Welfare Economics, Economic Order, and Competition.” In: Giersch, H. (ed.)Money, Trade and Competition—Essays in Memory of Egon Sohmen. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streit, M. E. (1992b) “Economic Order, Private Law and Public Policy—The Freiburg School of Law and Economics in Perspective.”Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 148: 675–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollison, R. D. (1982) “Rent Seeking: A Survey.”Kyklos 35(4): 575–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollison, R. D. (1989) “Chicago Political Economy.”Public Choice 63: 293–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, A. de (1981 [1835])De la Démocratie en Amérique I. ed. by F. Furet. Paris: Garnier-Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1989)The Economics of Special Privilege and Rent-seeking. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanberg, V. (1992) “Innovation, Cultural Evolution, and Economic Growth.” In: Witt, U. (ed.)Explaining Process and Change—Approaches to Evolutionary Economics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanberg, V. (1993) “Constitutionally Constrained and Safeguarded Competition in Markets and Politics—With Reference to a European Constitution.”Journal des Économistes et des Études Humaines 4: 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanberg, V., and Kerber, W. (1994) “Institutional Competition Among Jurisdictions: An Evolutionary Approach.”Constitutional Political Economy 5(2): 193–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vihanto, M. (1992) “Competition Between Local Governments as a Discovery Procedure.”Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 148: 411–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. E. (1993) “The Impending Transformation of Public Choice Scholarship.”Public Choice 77: 203–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. [1954 (1925)]Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society. Translation from Max WeberWirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Second edition (1925), edited with introduction and annotations by M. Rheinstein. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, J. (1990) “Principles of Political Economy—An Outline Proposal, Illustrated by Application to Fiscal Federalism.”Constitutional Political Economy 1: 101–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, U. (1992a) “Turning Austrian Economics into an Evolutionary Theory.” In: Caldwell, B. J., and Boehm, S. (eds.)Austrian Economics: Tensions and New Directions. Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, U. (1992b)The Political Economy of Mass Media Societies. Paper presented at the Public Choice Society Meeting 1992, New Orleans, mimeo.

  • Wittman, D. (1984) “Multi-Candidate Equilibria.”Public Choice 43(3): 287–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittmann, D. (1989) “Why Democracies Produce Efficient Results.”Journal of Political Economy 97(6): 1395–1424.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wohlgemuth, M. Economic and political competition in neoclassical and evolutionary perspective. Constit Polit Econ 6, 71–96 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01298377

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01298377

JEL classification

Navigation