Skip to main content
Log in

Diverticular rupture during colonoscopy

Fact or fancy?

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Uncomplicated colonic diverticula have been regarded as weak points in the bowel wall which have a predisposition to rupture during colonoscopy. We attempted to prove or disprove this assumption. Eleven segments of diverticula-containing sigmoid colon were insufflated via a colonoscope and the rupture pressure manometrically recorded. The mean ±sem pressure causing serosal tear was 202±15 mm Hg and mucosal rupture 226 ± 14 mm Hg. No diverticular blowouts occurred. Intraluminal sigmoid pressures were measured manometrically in 15 patients with and 15 patients without colonic diverticula during routine colonoscopy. The pressure recordings were read in a blinded fashion, and the values were then grouped and analyzed in those patients with and without sigmoid colon diverticula. Intrarectal, sigmoid, peak sigmoid, peak sigmoid with cough, and peak sigmoid with Valsalva pressures were similar in both groups. Furthermore, the pressure levels generated during colonoscopy were much lower than those required for colonic rupture in the cadaver colons. We conclude that the reason most colonic perforations occur in the sigmoid area is not due to diverticular blowout. Rather, excluding instances where electrocautery is used, we feel it is due to instrument trauma. Less commonly, excessive air insufflation can result in serosal laceration and mucosal rupture, whereas diverticular blowout is probably limited to the setting of acute diverticulitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wolff WI, Shinya H: Letter to the editor N Engl J Med 288:975, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  2. Williams CB, Lane RH, Sakai Y, Hanwell AE: Colonoscopy: An air-pressure hazard. Lancet 2:729, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  3. Penfold JCB: Perforation of the colon complicating colonoscopy: Report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 18:626–627, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eastwood MA, Watters DAK, Smith AN: Diverticular disease: Is it a motility disorder? Clin Gastroenterol 11:545–561, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schwesinger WH, Levine BA: Complications in colonoscopy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 148:270–281, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kozarek RA, Sanowski RA: Use of pressure release valve to prevent colonic injury during colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 26:139–142, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burton AC: Importance of shape and size of the heart. Am Heart J 54:801–810, 1957

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stillwell GK: The law of LaPlace: some clinical applications. Mayo Clin Proc 48:863–869, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  9. Noveroske RJ: Intracolonic pressures during barium enema examinations. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 91:852–863, 1964

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kozarek RA, Earnest DL, Silverstein ME, Smith RG: Airpressure-induced colon injury during diagnostic colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 78:7–14, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  11. Painter NS, Truelove SG: The intraluminal pressure patterns in diverticulosis of the colon. Gut 5:201–207, 1964

    Google Scholar 

  12. Parks TG, Connell AM: Motility studies in diverticular disease of the colon. Gut 10:538–542, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith AN, Shepherd J, Eastwood MA: Pressure changes after balloon distention of the colon wall in diverticular disease. Gut 22:841–844, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  14. Panish JF: Limitations and complications of colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 26:20S-21S, 1980

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brayko, C.M., Kozarek, R.A., Sanowski, R.A. et al. Diverticular rupture during colonoscopy. Digest Dis Sci 29, 427–431 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01296218

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01296218

Keywords

Navigation