Skip to main content
Log in

Response ofZea mays roots to infection withPhytophthora cinnamomi

I. The epidermal layer

  • Published:
Protoplasma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Zea mays is a non-host ofPhytophthora cinnamomi; plants survive contact with this fungus both in the field and in pot trials. TheZ. mays-P. cinnamomi interaction has been studied by light and electron microscopy. In the epidermal layer, fungal hyphae grow intercellularly through the middle lamella. This is always the case for the first hyphal contact with any cell. Hyphae making second or subsequent contacts with a cell grow preferentially between the cell wall and plasma membrane of the infected cell rather than through the middle lamella.

Papillae (callose deposits) are formed in response to some, but not all, regions of contact between the plant cell and the hypha. They do not completely encase the hypha and do not stop hyphal growth. The plasma membrane-cell wall interface of the host cell must be intact for effective papilla formation, as papillae are rarely formed when the hyphae grow between the plasma membrane and the cell wall.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aist, J. R., 1983: Structural responses as resistance mechanisms. In: The dynamics of host defence (Bailey, J. A., Deverall, B. J., eds.), pp. 33–65. Sydney: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen F. H. E., Friend, J., 1983: Resistance of potato tubers to infection byPhytophthora infestans: a structural study of haustorial encasement. Physiol. Plant Pathol.22, 285–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrt, P., Grant, B., 1979: The conditions governing zoospore production in axenic cultures ofPhytophthora cinnamomi Rands. Aust. J. Bot.27, 103–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eschrich, W., Currier, H. B., 1964: Identification of callose by its diachrome and fluorochrome reactions. Stain Technol.39, 303–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hachler, H., Hohl, H. R., 1984: Temporal and spatial distribution patterns of collar and papillae wall appositions in resistant and susceptible tuber tissue ofSolanum tuberosum infected byPhytophthora infestans. Physiol. Plant Pathol.24, 107–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanchey, P., Wheeler, H., 1971: Pathological changes in ultrastructure: Tobacco roots infected withPhytophthora parasitica var.nicotianae. Phytopathology61, 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, M. C., 1980: Reactions of nonsuscepts to fungal pathogens. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol.18, 211–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinch, J. M., Clarke, A. E., 1982: Callose formation inZea mays as a response to infection withPhytophthora cinnamomi. Physiol. Plant Pathol.21, 113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Weste, G. M., 1979: Behaviour ofPhytophthora cinnamomi zoospores on roots of Australian forest species. Aust. J. Bot.27, 679–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohl, H. R., Stossel, P., Hachler, H., 1980: Papilla formation and partial inhibition of fungal glucanases by phytoalexins in thePhytophthora infestans-Solanum tuberosum system. Ann. Phytopathol.12, 353–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Suter, E., 1976: Host-parasite interfaces in a resistant and a susceptible cultivar ofSolanum tuberosum inoculated withPhytophthora infestans leaf tissue. Can. J. Bot.54, 1956–1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacWithey, H. S., 1965: Factors affecting the prevalence of black rot disease of sugar beets. Phytopathology55, 1066.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mourichon, X., Salle, G., 1981: étude ultrastructurale des relations hÔte-parasite au cours de l'infection des pommes par lePhytophthora cactorum. Can. J. Bot.59, 251–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, J. R.,Shaw, D. S., 1978: Aggregation ofPhytophthora dreschleri zoospores; pattern analysis suggests a taxis. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc.71 (3), 1978.

  • Smith, M. M., McCully, M. E., 1978: Enhancing aniline blue fluorescent staining of cell wall structures. Stain Tech.53, 79–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stossel, P., Lazarovits, G., Ward, E. W. B., 1981: Electron microscope study of race-specific and age related resistant and susceptible reactions of soybeans toPhytophthora megasperma var.sojae. Phytopathology71, 617–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tippett, J., Holland, A. A., Marks, G. C., O'Brien, T. P., 1976: Penetration ofPhytophthora cinnamomi into disease tolerant and susceptible eucalypts. Arch. Microbiol.108, 231–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Malajczuk, N., 1979: Interaction ofPhytophthora cinnamomi and a resistant host,Acacia pulchella. Phytopathol.69, 764–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,O'Brien, T., Holland, A. A., 1977: Ultrastructural changes in eucalypt roots caused byPhytophthora cinnamomi. Physiol. Plant Pathol.11 (3), 279–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherbee, R., Hinch, J. M., Bonig, I., Clarke, A. E., 1984: Response ofZea mays roots to infection withPhytophthora cinnamomi: II. The cortex and stele. Protoplasma126, 188–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zentmyer, G. A., 1980:Phytophthora cinnamomi and the diseases it causes. Monograph No. 10, The American Phytopathological Society.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hinch, J.M., Wetherbee, R., Mallett, J.E. et al. Response ofZea mays roots to infection withPhytophthora cinnamomi . Protoplasma 126, 178–187 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01281793

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01281793

Keywords

Navigation