Skip to main content
Log in

Truss topology optimization including bar properties different for tension and compression

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Structural optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem of optimum truss topology design based on the ground structure approach is considered. It is known that any minimum weight truss design (computed subject to equilibrium of forces and stress constraints with the same yield stresses for tension and compression) is—up to a scaling—the same as a minimum compliance truss design (subject to static equilibrium and a weight constraint). This relation is generalized to the case when different properties of the bars for tension and for compression additionally are taken into account. This situation particularly covers the case when a structure is optimized which consists of rigid (heavy) elements for bars under compression, and of (light) elements which are hardly/not able to carry compression (e.g. ropes). Analogously to the case when tension and compression is handled equally, an equivalence is established and proved which relates minimum weight trusses to minimum compliance structures. It is shown how properties different for tension and compression pop up in a modified global stiffness matrix now depending on tension and compression. A numerical example is included which shows optimal truss designs for different scenarios, and which proves (once more) the big influence of bar properties (different for tension and for compression) on the optimal design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achtziger, W. 1993a: Minimax compliance truss topology subject to multiple loadings. In: Bendsøe, M.P.; Mota Soares, C.A. (eds.)Topology optimization of structures, 43–54. Dordrecht: Kluwer

    Google Scholar 

  • Achtziger, W. 1993b: Optimierung von einfach und mehrfach belasteten Stabwerken (in German).Bayreuther Math. Schriften 46

  • Achtziger, W.; Bendsøe, M.P.; Ben-Tal, A.; Zowe, J. 1992: Equivalent displacement based formulations for maximum strength truss topology design.Impact Comp. Sci. Eng. 4, 315–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, H.L. 1965:The design of structures for least weight. Oxford: Pergamon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorn, W.; Gomory, R.; Greenberg, M. 1964: Automatic design of optimal structures.J. de Mech. 3, 25–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemp, W.S. 1973:Optimum structures. Oxford: Clarendon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, U. 1989: Optimal topologies of structures.Appl. Mech. Rev. 42, 223–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Michell, A.G.M. 1904: The limits of economy of material in frame-structures.Phil. Mag. 8, 589–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar, R.T. 1970:Convex analysis. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozvany, G.I.N.; Bendsøe, M.P.; Kirsch, U. 1995: Layout optimization of structures.Appl. Mech. Rev. 48, 41–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozvany, G.I.N.; Gollub, W. 1990: Michell layouts for various combinations of line supports, Part I.Int. J. Mech. Sci. 32, 1021–1043

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozvany, G.I.N.; Wang, C.M. 1983: On plane Prager structures—I.Int. J. Mech. Sci. 25, 519–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Svanberg, K. 1993: On the convexity and concavity of compliances.Struct. Optim. 7, 42–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J.E.; Rossow, M.P. 1977: Optimal truss design based on an algorithm using optimality criteria.Int. J. Solids Struct. 13, 913–923

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Achtziger, W. Truss topology optimization including bar properties different for tension and compression. Structural Optimization 12, 63–74 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01270445

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01270445

Keywords

Navigation