Abstract
Fixed points and eigencurves have been studied for the Hénon-Heiles mapping:x′=x+a (y−y 3),y′=y(x′−x′ 3). Eigencurves of order 21 proceed rapidly to infinity fora=1.78, but as ‘a’ decreases, they spiral around the origin repeatedly before escaping to infinity. Fixed pointsx f on thex-axis have been located for the range 1≤a≤2.4, for ordersn up to 100. Their locations vary continuously witha, as do the eigencurves, and hyperbolic points remain hyperbolic.
Forn=3 and 2.4≥a≥2.37, a very detailed study has been made of how escape occurs, with segments of an eigencurve mapping to infinity through various escape channels. Further calculations with ‘a’ decreasing to 2.275 show that this instability is preserved and that the eigencurve will spiral many times around the origin before reaching an escape channel, there being more than 34 turns fora=2.28. The rapid increase of this number is associated with the rapid decrease of the intersection angle between forward and backward eigencurves (at the middle homoclinic point), with decreasing ‘a’, this angle governing the outward motion.
By a semi-topological argument, it is shown that escape must occur if the above intersection angle is nonzero. In the absence of a theoretical expression for this angle, one is forced to rely on the numerical evidence. If the angle should attain zero for a valuea=a c>am,wherea m .is the minimum value for which the fixed points exist, then no escape would be possible fora<a c However, on the basis of calculations by Jenkins and Bartlett (1972) forn=6, and the results of the present article forn=3, it appears highly probable thata c=am,and that escape from the neighborhood of a hyperbolic point is always possible.
If there is escape from the hyperbolic fixed point forn=4,a=1.6, located atx f=0.268, then the eigencurve must cross the apparently closed invariant curve of Hénon-Heiles which intersects thex-axis atx≊±0.4, so that this curve cannot in fact be closed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnol'd, V. I.: 1963,Uspekhi Mat. Nauk USSR 18, Ser. 5 (113), 13.
Bartlett, J. H.: 1961, Mathematical Congress, Leningrad.
Bartlett, J. H. and Wagner, C. A.: 1970,Celest. Mech. 2, 228.
Jenkins, B. Z. and Bartlett, J. H.: 1972,Celest. Mech.,5, 407.
Bartlett, J. H.: 1976, in V. Szebehely and B. D. Tapley,Long-Time Prediction in Dynamics, pp. 99–110, D. Reidel Publ. Co.
Hénon, M. and Heiles, C.: 1964,Astron. J. 69, 73.
Hénon, M.: 1966,Bull. Astron. 1 (3), 64.
Hénon, M.: 1969,Quart. Appl. Math. 27, 291.
Laslett, L. J.: 1968, AEC-Research and Development Report NYO-1480-101.
Moser, J.: 1960,Bol. Soc. Mat. Mexicana, p. 176.
Moser, J.: 1962, Akad. Wiss. Göttingen Nachr., Math. Phys. Kl. II a, No. 1, 1.
Moser, J.: 1968, AEC Research and Development Report NYO-1480-101.
Moser, J.: 1971, in Siegel-Moser,Lectures on Celestial Mechanics, Section 23, pp. 32–34.
Roels, J. and Hénon, M.: 1967,Bull. Astron. 2 (3), 267.
Rüssman, H.: 1967,Math. Ann. 137, 64.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bartlett, J.H. Instability of an area-preserving polynomial mapping. Celestial Mechanics 17, 3–36 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01261051
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01261051