Skip to main content
Log in

Cyto-taxonomy of Miridae and Nabidae (Hemiptera)

  • Published:
Chromosoma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary and conclusions

  1. 1.

    The chromosome numbers of 51Miridae and nineNabidae (Hemiptera-Heteroptera, Cimicoidea) are given.

  2. 2.

    InMiridae, Deraeocorinae, Bryocorinae andMirinae have a type 2n=34 and Phylinae 2n=32. Dicyphinae has 2n=48 and Orthotylinae 2n=24. The basic mirid caryotype is 32A+X+Y.

  3. 3.

    The caryotype ofDicyphinae supports the view that the group warrants subfamily status.

  4. 4.

    Phylus melanocephalus (2n=18) is unique amongst the mirids examined and could perhaps be retaining a primitive pro-mirid chromosome number.

  5. 5.

    InNabidae, Nabinae have a type 2n=18.

  6. 6.

    The species pairNabis rugosus andN. ericetorum are characterised by the same kind of deviation from family caryotype.

  7. 7.

    Himacerus mirmecoides has double the family complement of autosomes.

  8. 8.

    The basic cimicoid caryotype is, it is suggested, 2n=16A+ X+Y.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carvalho, J. C. M.: Chaves para os generos de Mirideos do Mundo (Hemiptera). Bol. Mus. para. Emilio Goeldi11 (2), 1–151 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, J. C. M., andD. Lesion: The classification of the BritishMiridae (Hem.), with keys to the genera. Ent. mon. Mag.88, 231–251 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, H. H.: The plant bugs, orMiridae, of Illinois. Bull. Illinois Nat. Hist. Surv.22 (1), 1–234 (1941).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kullenberg, B.: Über Morphologie und Funktion des Kopulationsapparates der Capsiden und Nabiden. Zool. Bidr.24, 217–418 (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leston, D.: Geographical zonation of atypical caryotypes in shieldbugs. Nature (Lond.)178, 933–334 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • - Chromosome number and the systematics ofPentatomomorpha (Hemiptera). Trans. int. Congr. Ent.10 (1957).

  • Leston, D., J. G. PenderGrast andT. R. E. Southwood: Classification of the terrestrialHeteroptera (Geocorisae) Nature (Lond.)174, 91–92 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leston, D., andT. R. E. Southwood: An annotated checklist of the BritishHemiptera-Heteroptera. Trans. Soc. Brit. Ent. (in preparation).

  • Makino, S.: An atlas of the chromosome numbers in animals. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State College Press 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrader, F., andS. Hughes-Schrader: Polyploidy and fragmentation in the chromosomal evolution of various species ofThyanta (Hemiptera). Chromosoma7, 469–496 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • Slack, H. D.: Cytological studies on five families ofHemiptera-Heteroptera. Thesis for degree of Ph. D.: University of Edinburgh 1938 (unpublished).

  • Slater, J. A.: An investigation of the female genitalia as taxonomio characters in theMiridae (Hemiptera). Iowa State Coll. J. Sci.25, 1–81 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, E.: Bemerkungen zum System derMiridae (Hem. Het.). Dtsch. entomol. Z., N. F.2, 230 bis 242 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M. J. D.: Animal cytology and evolution. London: C. U. P. 1954.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leston, D. Cyto-taxonomy of Miridae and Nabidae (Hemiptera). Chromosoma 8, 609–616 (1956). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01259522

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01259522

Keywords

Navigation