Skip to main content
Log in

How urbanites define their neighborhoods

  • Published:
Population and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the ways that residents of the Seattle metropolitan region define "neighborhood" in the abstract and their own neighborhoods in particular. On the whole, the neighborhood is regarded as a relatively limited unit, both in terms of areal size and functional relevance. Two major dimensions of neighborhood definition are evident. Individuals tend to define neighborhood primarily in terms of either human interaction or pure space, and they also differ in their views on its geographic size and institutional development. The two dimensions of definition are shown to vary with patterns of local activity, social-demographic characteristics, and the physical environment. While only a small proportion of the variation in responses is explained, the results suggest that neighborhood definitions are rational responses to the social and physical position of the respondent within urban society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, F. M., Morgan, J. N., Sonquist, J. A., Klem, L. (1973).Multiple classification analysis (2nd ed). Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleyard, D. (1970). Why buildings are known: A predictive tool for architects and planners.Environment and Behavior, 1 131–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, B. L., Braun, E. S., Colman, R. P., Da Lomba, D. W., Parsons, W. L., Sharpe, L. C., Weber, S. A. (1979).The behavioral foundations of neighborhood change. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, R. (1905). The neighborhood, urban ecology and city planners.American Sociological Review, 15 502–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everitt, J., & Cadwallader, M. (1972). The home area concept in urban analysis: The use of cognitive mapping and computer procedures as methodological tools. In W. J. Mitchell (Ed.),Environmental design: Research and practice (pp. 1.2.1–1.2.10). Los Angeles: University of California/EDRA 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, M. (1973).The world of the urban working class. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, H. J. (1962).The urban villagers. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, K. C., Stueve, A., & Fischer, C. S. (1977).Attachment to place. In C. S. Fischer, R. M. Jackson, C. A. Stueve, K. Gerson, L. M. Jones, & M. Baldassare (Eds.),Networks and places: Social relations in the urban setting (pp. 139–161). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, S. (1962).The emerging city: Myth and reality. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest, A. M., & Weed, J. A. (1976). Ethnic residential segregation: Patterns of change.American Journal of Sociology, 81 1088–1111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest, A. M., Lee, B. A., & Staeheli, L. (1982). Changing locality identification in the metropolis, Seattle: 1920–1978.American Sociological Review, 47 543–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest, A. M., Staeheli, L., & Lee, B. A. (1983). Consensus on locality names in the metropolis.Sociology and Social Research, 67 374–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney, W. G., & Knowles, E. S. (1978). Perception of neighborhoods by city and suburban residents.Human Ecology, 6 201–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, A. (1971).Urban society: An ecological approach. New York: Ronald Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, J., & Wolf, S. (1978). Effects of urban residence on interpersonal trust and helping behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36 1029–1043.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, A. (1974).Symbolic communities. The persistence and change of Chicago local communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, A. (1978). Persistence of local sentiments in mass society. In D. Street (Ed.),Handbook of contemporary urban life (pp. 133–162). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasarda, J. D., & Janowitz, M. (1974). Community attachment in mass society.American Sociological Review, 39 328–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, S. (1968).The urban neighborhood. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. R. (1973). Psychology and living space. In R. M. Downs & D. Stea (Eds.),Image and environment: Cognitive mapping and spatial behavior (pp. 87–108). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. (1960).The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClenahan, B. A. (1929).The changing urban neighborhood: A sociological study. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, R. D. (1923).The neighborhood: A study of local life in the city of Columbus, Ohio. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orleans, P. (1973). Differential cognition of urban residents: Effects of social scale on mapping. In R. M. Downs & D. Stea (Eds.),Image and environment: Cognitive mapping and spatial behavior (pp. 115–130). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orleans, P., & Schmidt, S. (1972). Mapping the city: Environmental cognition of urban residents. In W. J. Mitchell (Ed.),Environmental design: Research and practice (pp. 1.4.1–1.4.9). Los Angeles: University of California/EDRA 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riemer, S. (1951). Villagers in metropolis. British Journal of Sociology, 2, 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suttles, G. (1972).The social construction of communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweetser, F. L., Jr. Neighborhood acquaintance and association: A study of personal neighborhoods (Doctoral Dissertation, Columbia University, 1941).

  • Taylor, R. B. (1982). Neighborhood physical environment and stress. In G. W. Evans (Ed.),Environmental stress (pp. 286–324). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, D. I. (1975).Black neighborhoods: An assessment of community power. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, R. L. (1965).Studying your community. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber, M. M. (1963). Order in diversity: Community without propinquity. In L. Wingo (Ed.),Cities and space: The future use of urban land (pp. 23–54). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B., & Leighton, B. (1979). Neighborhoods, networks and communities: Approaches to the community question.Urban Affairs Quarterly, 14 363–390.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research has been supported by a grant from NICHD, Attachment to Metropolitan Community Area and Neighborhood. We are grateful to Gayle Coryell, Mary Beth Dahl, Barbara Metch, R.S. Oropesa, and Lynn Staeheli, for their careful processing of the data, and to Judith Fiedler, for her capable supervision of the interviewing. Sylvia Danielson provided helpful assistance in preparation of the manuscript. Oropesa and Jerald Herting supplied useful comments on a previous version of the paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guest, A.M., Lee, B.A. How urbanites define their neighborhoods. Popul Environ 7, 32–56 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01257471

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01257471

Keywords

Navigation