Skip to main content
Log in

Cytokinesis in HeLa: Post-telophase delay and microtubule-associated motility

  • Published:
Protoplasma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Phase-contrast microcinematography of cultured HeLa cells reveals that cell separation is considerably delayed after telophase. During this period of delay, the daughter cells lose their rounded morphology and become flattened against the substrate, as occurs in interphase. After two or more hours, the cells again become rounded while the thin intercellular bridge connecting them begins to elongate. This active elongation involves the migration of thickenings (“waves”) along the bridge from the midbody at its center toward either cell. Later, waves occur only on one side of the midbody as this half of the bridge alone continues to elongate. The arrival of waves at the cells is accompanied not only by discrete increases of length in that half of the bridge, but also by blebbing activity in that cell. Rupture of the bridge finally occurs just adjacent to the cell receiving these latter waves.

Electron microscopic examination of cells in post-telophase delay has demonstrated a bundle of microtubules passing into either cell from the midbody in the center of the intercellular bridge. These microtubules are of constant length during bridge elongation; the cells are simply forced distally along the surface of the microtubule bundle. The waves themselves are found to contain microtubules just as straight as those in the rest of the bridge, so it is concluded that the force apparently generated here consists of the longitudinal translation of material along the surfaces of the rigid microtubules. It is pointed out that these forces may operate in the earlier phases of mitosis and in other systems of microtubule-associated motility. We also discuss the possible roles of post-telophase delay and of active bridge elongation in the organization of normal tissues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Behnke, O., andA. Forer, 1966: C. R. Lab. Carlsberg35, 437.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Belar, K., 1927: Naturwissenschaften15, 725.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bikle, D., L. G. Tilney, andK. R. Porter, 1966: Protoplasma61, 322.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bucciante, L., 1927: Protoplasma2, 80.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buck, R., 1963: In: The Cell in Mitosis,L. Levine (ed.), New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. — andJ. Tisdale, 1962: J. Cell Biol.13, 109.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Byers, B., andK. R. Porter, 1964: Proc. nat. Acad. Sci., U.S.52, 1091.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clark, E., 1912: Amer. J. Anat.13, 351.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fawcett, D. W., 1961: Exp. Cell Res., suppl.8, 174.

    Google Scholar 

  10. — andK. R. Porter, 1954: J. Morph.94, 221.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Flemming, W., 1891: Arch. mikr. Anat.37, 685.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Forer, A., 1965: J. Cell Biol.35, part 2, 95.

    Google Scholar 

  13. —, 1966: Chromosoma19, 44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fry, H. J., 1937: Biol. Bull.73, 565.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gibbons, I. R., 1963: Proc. nat. Acad. Sci., U.S.50, 1002.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hepler, P. K., andW. T. Jackson, 1968: J. Cell Biol.38, 437.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hsu, T. L., 1955: J. nat. Cancer Inst.16, 691.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hughes, A., 1952: The Mitotic Cycle. New York: Acad. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. — andM. M. Swann, 1948: J. exp. Biol.25, 45.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Inoue, S., 1964: In: Primitive Motile Systems in Cell Biology,R. D. Allen andN. Kamiya (eds.), New York: Acad. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kane, R. E., andA. Forer, 1965: J. Cell Biol.25, part 2, 31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kitching, J. A., 1964: In: Primitive Motile Systems in Cell Biology.

  23. — andS. Craggs, 1965: Exp. Cell Res.40, 658.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Krishan, A., andR. Buck, 1965: J. Cell Biol.24, 433.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ledbetter, M. L., andK. R. Porter, 1963: J. Cell Biol.19, 239.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Manton, I., 1952. Symp. Soc. exp. Biol.6, 309.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mazia, D., 1961: The Cell2, 77.

    Google Scholar 

  28. McQuilkin, W. T., andW. R. Earle, 1962: J. nat. Cancer Inst.28, 763.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Merchant, D., R. Kahn, andW. Murphy, Jr., 1961: Handbook on Cell and Organ Culture. Minneapolis, Minn.: Burgess Publ. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Palay, S. L., 1956: J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol.2, suppl., 193.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Paweletz, N., 1967: Naturwissenschaften54, 533.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Porter, K. R., 1966: In: Ciba Found. Symp. on Principles of Bimolecular Organization,G. E. W. Wolstenholme andM. O'Conner (eds.), London: J. & A. Churchill Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Porter, K. R., S. D. Badenhausen, andM. L. Ledbetter, 1964: Excerpta Medica, International Congress Series77, 36.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rebhun, L. I., 1964: In: Primitive Motile Systems in Cell Biology.

  35. — andG. Sander, 1967: J. Cell Biol.34, 859.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Richters, A., andR. P. Sherwin, 1966: Lab. Invest.14, 2122.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Robbins, E., andN. K. Gonates, 1964: J. Cell Biol.21, 429.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rudzinska, M. A., 1965: J. Cell Biol.25, 459.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Satir, P., 1965: J. Cell Biol.26, 805.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Slautterback, D. B., 1963: J. Cell Biol.18, 367.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tilney, L. G., andK. R. Porter, 1965: Protoplasma60, 317.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Weiss, P., C. Taylor, andP. Pillai, 1962: Science136, 330.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Byers, B., Abramson, D.H. Cytokinesis in HeLa: Post-telophase delay and microtubule-associated motility. Protoplasma 66, 413–435 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01255868

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01255868

Keywords

Navigation