Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic analysis of agronomic traits in a cross between sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) and its presumed progenitor (S. robustum Brandes & Jesw. ex Grassl)

  • Published:
Molecular Breeding Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Saccharum robustum Brandes & Jesw. ex Grassl has been suggested as the immediate progenitor species of cultivated sugarcane (S. officinarum L.) [4]. Chromosome pairing and assortment in these two species were previously studied by genetic analysis of single-dose DNA markers in parents in and 44 F1 progeny of a cross between euploid, meiotically regular 2n=80S. officinarum ‘LA Purple’ andS. robustum ‘Mol 5829’ [2]. This same population was subsequently clonally propagated and evaluated in replicated trials for quantitative traits important to sugarcane breeders. Numbers of stalks, tasseled stalks, and stalks with smut, and the average diameter of two stalks were determined one day prior to harvest. At harvest, plant material from each plot was weighed and evaluated for pol (sucrose content) and fiber percentages. Clones were significantly different (P<0.01) for all traits analyzed. Associations of 83 single-dose arbitrarily primed PCR genetic markers with quantitative trait loci (QTL) of recorded traits was determined by single-factor ANOVA, and multiple regression. QTL analysis revealed markers significantly (P<0.05) associated with the expression of each trait analyzed. Markers associated with QTL after multiple regression were tested for digenic linear × linear epistatic interactions. The various multilocus models explained between 23% and 58% of the total phenotypic variation and 32% and 76% of the genotypic variation for the various traits. Digenic interactions were uncommon. Implications for marker-assisted selection in sugarcane and sugarcane domestication are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Janabi SM, Honeycutt RJ, McClelland M, Sobral BWS: A genetic linkage map ofSaccharum spontaneum L. ‘SES 208’. Genetics 134: 1249–1260 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Janabi SM, Honeycutt RJ, Sobral BWS: Chromosome assortment inSaccharum. Theor Appl Genet 89: 959–963 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Janabi SM, McClelland M, Petersen C, Sobral BWS: Phylogenetic analysis of organellar DNA sequences in the Andropogoneae:Saccharinae. Theor Appl Genet 88: 933–944 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Artschwager E, Brandes EW: Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.): Origin, Classification, Characteristics, and Descriptions of Representative Clones. United States Department of Agriculture Handbook No. 122, Washington, D.C. (1958).

  5. Brandes EW: Into primeval Papua by seaplane. Natl Geogr 56: 253–332 (1928).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clayton WD, Renvoize SA: Genera Graminum. Grasses of the World. Kew Bulletin Additional Series XIII, Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bridges WC, Sobral BWS: Validation strategies for analysis of quantitative trait loci using markers. In: Sobral BWS (ed) The Impact of Plant Molecular Genetics. Birkhauser, Boston (in press).

  8. Da Silva JAG: A methodology for genome mapping of autopolyploids and its application to sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) Ph. D. dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Da Silva JAG, Sobral BWS: Genetics of polyploids. In: Sobral BWS (ed) The Impact of Plant Molecular Genetics. Birkhauser, Boston (in press).

  10. Da Silva J, Burnquist WL, Tanksley SD: RFLP linkage map and genome analysis ofSaccharum spontaneum. Genome 36: 782–791 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Da Silva J, Honeycutt RJ, Burnquist W, Al-Janabi SM, Sorrells ME, Tanksley SD, Sobral BWS:Saccharum spontaneum genetic linkage map containing DNA markers. Mol Breed 1: 165–179 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Daniels J, Roach BT: Taxonomy and evolution in breeding. In: Heinz DJ (ed) Sugarcane Improvement through Breeding, pp. 7–84. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Daniels J, Williams CA: The origin of the genusSaccharum. ISSCT Sugarcane Breed Newsl 36: 24–39 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  14. de Vicente MC, Tanksley SD: QTL analysis of transgressive segregation in an interspecific tomato cross. Genetics 134: 585–596 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Doebley J, Stec A: Genetic analysis of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte. Genetics 129: 285–295 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Doebley J, Stec A: Inheritance of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte: comparison of results for two F2 populations. Genetics 134: 559–570 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Doebley J, Stec A, Wendel J, Edwards M: Genetic and morphological analysis of a maize-teosinte F2 population: implications for the origin of maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 9888–9892 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Edwards MD, Stuber CW, Wendel JF: Molecular-marker-facilitated investigations of quantitative-trait loci in maize. I. Numbers, genomic distribution, and types of gene action. Genetics 116: 113–125 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hamby RK, Zimmer EA: Ribosomal RNA sequences for inferring phylogeny within the grass family (Poaceae). Plant Syst Evol 160: 29–37 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Honeycutt RJ, Sobral BWS, Keim P, Irvine JE: A rapid DNA extraction method for sugarcane and its relatives. Plant Mol Biol Rep 10: 66–72 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lander ES, Botstein D: Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 121: 185–199 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Leonards-Schippers C, Gieffers W, Schafer-Pregl R, Ritter E, Knapp SJ, Salamini F, Gebhardt C: Quantitative resistance toPhytophthora infestans in potato: a case study for QTL mapping in an allogamous plant species. Genetics 137: 67–77 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mukherjee SK: Origin and distribution ofSaccharum. Bot Gaz 119: 55–61 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nodari RO, Tsai SM, Guzman P, Gilbertson RL, Gepts P: Toward an integrated linkage map of common bean. III. Mapping genetic factors controlling host-bacteria interactions. Genetics 134: 341–350 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Parthasarathy N: Origin of noble sugar-canes (Saccharum officinarum L.). Nature 161: 608 (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Paterson AH, De Verna JW, Lanini B, Tanksley SD: Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci using selected over-lapping recombinant chromosomes, in an interspecies cross of tomato. Genetics 124: 735–742 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Paterson AH, Damon S, Hewit JD, Peterson S, Lincoln SE, Lander ES, Tanksley SD: Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in tomato: comparison across species, generations, and environments. Genetics 127: 181–197 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Payne JH, Mahon HI: The Pol ratio method for evaluating cane quality. Proc Int Soc Sugarcane Tech pp. 436–447 (1956).

  29. Roach BT, Daniels J: A review of the origin and improvement of sugarcane. In Copersucar International Sugarcane Breeding Workshop, pp. 1–31. Copersucar, Brazil (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  30. SAS Institute, Inc. JMP User's Guide. SAS Institute, Cary, NC (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Shapiro SS, Wilk MB: An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52: 591–611 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sobral BWS, Braga DPV, LaHood ES, Keim P: Phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast restriction enzyme site mutations in the Saccharinae Griseb. subtribe of the Androponeae Dumort. tribe. Theor Appl Genet 87: 843–853 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sobral BWS, Honeycutt RJ: High output genetic mapping in polyploids using PCR-generated markers. Theor Appl Genet 86: 105–112 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Soller M, Brody T, Genizi A: On the power of experimental design for the detection of linkage between marker loci and quantitative loci in crosses between inbred lines. Theor Appl Genet 47: 35–39 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Springer PS, Zimmer EA, Bennetzen JL: Genomic organization of the ribosomal DNA of sorghum and its close relatives. Theor Appl Genet 77: 844–850 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Stebbins, GL: Taxonomy and the evolution of genera, with special reference to the family Gramineae. Evolution 10: 235–245 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Stuber CW, Edwards MD, Wendel JF: Molecular marker-facilitated investigations of quantitative trait loci in maize. II. factors influencing yield and its component traits. Crop Sci 27: 639–648 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Stuber CW, Lincoln SE, Wolff DW, Helentjaris T, Lander ES: Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics 132: 823–839 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Weller JI, Soller M, Brody T: Linkage analysis of quantitative traits in an interspecific cross of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum ×Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium) by means of genetic markers. Genetics 118: 329–339 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sills, G.R., Bridges, W., Al-Janabi, S.M. et al. Genetic analysis of agronomic traits in a cross between sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) and its presumed progenitor (S. robustum Brandes & Jesw. ex Grassl). Mol Breeding 1, 355–363 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01248413

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01248413

Key words

Navigation