Skip to main content
Log in

Transforming U.S. higher education: An organizational perspective

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scholarly work on organizational change within colleges and universities is relatively unknown among campus administrators and policy makers. To counter that low visibility, this essay reviews existing theories and research evidence on the topic. The goal is to provide some general guidelines for those who seek to refine purposes, develop programs, and improve effectiveness and efficiency on their campuses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldridge, J. V. (1980). Managerial innovation: Rules for successful implementation.Journal of Higher Education, 51, 117–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldridge, J. V., Curtis, D. V., Ecker, G., & Riley, G. L. (1980).Policy making and effective leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becher, T. & Kogan, M. (1980).Process and structure in higher education. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok, Derek. (1986).Higher learning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. (1978, January–February). In praise of inefficiency.AGB Reports.

  • Cameron, K. S. (1984). Organizational adaptation and higher education.Journal of Higher Education, 55, 122–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaffee, E. E. & Tierney, W. G. (1988).Collegiate culture and leadership strategies. New York: ACE-Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1970).The distinctive college: Antioch, Reed, and Swarthmore. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1983). The contradictions of change in academic systems.Higher Education, 12, 101–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. & March, J. G. (1986).Leadership and ambiguity: The American college president. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. R. (1993). Balancing acts: Dilemmas of choice facing research universities.Daedalus, 122, 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D. S. (1982). The management of academic culture: Notes on the management of meaning and social integration.Higher Education, 11, 303–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firestone, W. & Corbett, H. (1988). Planned organizational change. In N. Boyan, (Ed.),Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 321–340). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, E. (1989–90). Planning at the University of Minnesota.Planning for Higher Education, 18, 2, 25–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumport, P. J. (1993). The contested terrain of academic program reduction.Journal of Higher Education, 64, 283–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Richard. (1982).Organizations: Structure and process (3rd edition). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, J. C. & Griswold, C. P. (1994). State-level centralization and policy innovation in U.S. postsecondary education.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16, 161–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, Clark. (1982).The uses of the university, (3rd edition). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, Clark. (1994).Higher education cannot escape history: Issues for the twenty-first century. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K. S. (1989). Surviving institutional change: Reflections on curriculum reform in universities. In C. H. Pazandak (Ed.),Improving undergraduate education in large universities, New Directions for Higher Education, no. 66. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K. S. (1992). Organizational change. In Alkin, M., Linden, M., Noel, J., & Ray, K. (Eds.),Encyclopedia of education, Volume 3 (pp. 941–947). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1981). Footnotes to organizational change.Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 563–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1984). How we talk and how we act: Administrative theory and administrative life. In T. J. Sergiovanni and J. E. Corbally (Eds.),Leadership and organizational culture (pp. 18–35). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W. and B. Rowan. (1978). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony.American Journal of Sociology, 83, 440–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1992).Managing with power: Politics and influence in organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanelli, E. & Tushman, M. L. (1994). Organizational transformation as punctuated equilibrium: An empirical test.Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1141–1166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegfreid, J. J., Getz, M. & Anderson, K. H. (1995, May 19). The snail's pace of innovation in higher education.Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A56.

  • Simsek, H. & Louis, K. S. (1994). Organizational change as paradigm shift: Analysis of the change process in a large, public university.Journal of Higher Education, 65, 6, 670–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S. (1993). Retrenchment in the 1980s: The politics of prestige and gender.Journal of Higher Education, 64, 250–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyack, D. & Tobin, W. (1994). The “grammar” of schooling: Why has it been so hard to change?American Educational Research Journal, 31, 453–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vught, F. (1994). Policy models and policy instruments in higher education: The effects of governmental policy-making on the innovative behavior of higher education institutions. In J. Smart (Ed.),Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, Volume 10 (pp. 88–125). New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1977). Repunctuating the problem. In P. S. Goodman, J. M. Pennings, J. M. and Associates (Eds.),New perspectives on organizational effectiveness (pp. 193–225). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1982). Management of organizational change among loosely coupled elements. In P. S. Goodman and Associates (Eds.),Change in organizations (pp. 375–408). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1983). Contradictions in a community of scholars: The cohesion-accuracy tradeoff.Review of Higher Education, 6, 253–267.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

James C. Hearn is Professor of Higher Education at the Institute of Higher Education at the University of Georgia. He has his A.B. from Duke University and M.A. in Sociology and Ph.D. in the Sociology of Education from Stanford University. A former policy analyst and college administrator, his teaching and research focus on postsecondary organization and policy. Currently he is examining connections between institutional governance and the changing demography of university faculty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hearn, J.C. Transforming U.S. higher education: An organizational perspective. Innov High Educ 21, 141–154 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01243704

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01243704

Keywords

Navigation