Skip to main content
Log in

The reproductive potential of workers in slave-making ants

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Insectes Sociaux Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Colonies of slave-making ants have been used repeatedly to test sex allocation theory. It was suggested that workers of slave-making ants are more strongly selected to reproduce than workers of related, non-parasitic species, because they are incapable of manipulating sex allocation and the sexualization of larvae in their colonies. I show here that in slave-making Formicoxenini, worker ovaries on average consist of significantly more ovarioles than in non-parasiticLeptothorax species. Similarly, whereas in mostLeptothorax species, workers form reproductive hierarchies and lay eggs only in orphaned colonies, slave-maker workers show antagonistic interactions already in the presence of the queen and at least in some species have been observed ovipositing in queen-right colonies. The significance of these results is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altmann, J., 1974. Observational study of behavior: sampling methods.Behaviour 39:227–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baroni-Urbani, C., 1989. On a singular case of kin selection theory among Hymenoptera: justified fratricide and the natural way to avoid it.Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 1:373–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, B., 1994.Identification guide to the ant genera of the world. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 222 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma, J. J., 1993. Sex ratio variation in polygynous ants. In:Queen number and sociality in insects (L. Keller, Ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 86–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourke, A. F. G., 1988a. Worker reproduction in the higher eusocial Hymenoptera.Quart. Rev. Biol. 63:291–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourke, A. F. G., 1988b. Dominance orders, worker reproduction, and queen-worker conflict in the slave-making antHarpagoxenus sublaevis.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 23:323–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourke, A. F. G., 1989. Comparative analysis of sex-investment ratios in slave-making ants.Evolution 43:913–918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourke, A. F. G. and Franks, N. R., 1995.Social evolution in ants. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 529 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourke, A. F. G., T. M. van der Have and N. R. Franks, 1988. Sex ratio determination and worker reproduction in the slave-making antHarpagoxenus sublaevis.Behav. Ecol Sociobiol. 23:233–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brian, M. V., 1980. Social control over sex and caste in bees, wasps and ants.Biol. Rev. 55:379–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brian, M. V., 1983.Social insects: ecology and behavioural biology. Chapman and Hall, New York, 377pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brian, M. V. and J. Hibble, 1963. Larval size and the influence of the queen on growth inMyrmica.Ins. Soc. 10:71–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschinger, A., 1968. Mono- und Polygynie bei Arten der GattungLeptothorax Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Ins. Soc. 15:217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschinger, A., 1979. Functional monogyny in the American guest antFormicoxenus hirticornis (Emery) (=Leptothorax hirticornis), (Hym., Formicidae).Ins. Soc. 26:61–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschinger, A., 1981. Biological and systematic relationships of social parasiticLeptothoracini from Europe and North America. In:Biosystematics of social insects (P. E. Howse and J.-L. Clément, Eds.), Academic Press, London, pp. 211–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschinger, A., 1986. Evolution of social parasitism in ants.Trends Ecol. Evol. 1:155–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschinger, A., 1989. Evolution, speciation, and inbreeding in the parasitic ant genusEpimyrma (Hymenoptera, Formicidae).J. Evol. Biol. 2:265–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschinger, A., 1993. Rätselhafte Narben auf Ameisenlarven.Ameisenschutz aktuell 7:54–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschinger, A. and T. M. Alloway, 1977. Population structure and polymorphism in the slave-making antHarpagoxenus americanus (Emery) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Psyche 83:233–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschinger, A. and T. M. Alloway, 1978. Caste polymorphism inHarpagoxenus canadensis M. R. Smith (Hym., Formicidae).Ins. Soc. 25:339–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschinger, A. and A. Francoeur, 1983. The guest ant,Symmyrmica chamberlini, rediscovered near Salt Lake City, Utah (Hymenoptera, Formicidae).Psyche 90:297–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschinger, A. and U. Winter, 1976. Funktionelle Monogynie bei der GastameiseFormicoxenus nitidulus (Nyl.) (Hym., Form.).Ins. Soc. 23:549–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschinger, A. and U. Winter, 1978. Echte Arbeiterinnen, fertile Arbeiterinnen und sterile Wirtsweibchen in Völkern der dulotischen AmeiseHarpagoxenus sublaevis (Nyl.) (Hym., Form.).Ins. Soc. 25:63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschinger, A., A. Francoeur and K. Fischer, 1980. Functional monogyny, sexual behavior, and karyotype of the guest ant,Leptothorax provancheri Emery (Hymenoptera, Formicidae).Psyche 87:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buschinger, A., K. Jessen and H. Cagniant, 1990. The life history ofEpimyrma algeriana, a slavemaking ant with facultative polygyny (Hymenoptera, Formicidae).Zool. Beitr. N. F. 33:23–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choe, J. C., 1988. Worker reproduction and social evolution in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). In:Advances in myrmecology (J. C. Trager, Ed.), E. J. Brill, Leiden, pp. 163–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, B. J., 1981. Dominance hierarchies inLeptothorax ants.Science 212:83–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dejean, A. and L. Passera, 1974. Ponte des ouvrières et inhibition royale chez la fourmiTemno-thorax recedens (Nyl.) (Formicidae, Myrmicinae).Ins. Soc. 21:343–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francoeur, A., R. Loiselle and A. Buschinger, 1985. Biosystématique de la tribu Leptothoracini (Formicidae, Hymenoptera). 1. Le genreFormicoxenus dans la région holarctique.Naturaliste can. 112:343–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, N. R. and T. Scovell, 1983. Dominance and reproductive success among slave-making worker ants.Nature 304:724–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinze, J., 1991. Biochemical studies on the relationship between socially parasitic ants and their hosts.Biochem. Syst. Ecol 19:195–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinze, J., 1996. Reproductive hierarchies among workers of the slave-making ant,Chalepoxenus muellerianus.Ethology 102:117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinze, J. and A. Buschinger, 1988. Electrophoretic variability of esterases in the ant tribe Leptothoracini.Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 16:217–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinze, J. and A. Buschinger, 1989. Queen polymorphism inLeptothorax spec. A: its genetic and ecological background (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Ins. Soc. 36:139–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinze, J., T. Gübitz, C. Errard, A. Lenoir and B. Hölldobler, 1993a. Reproductive competition and colony fragmentation in the guest-ant,Formicoxenus provancheri.Experientia 49:814–816.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinze, J., S. Kühnholz, K. Schilder and B. Hölldobler, 1993b. Behavior of ergatoid males in the ant,Cardiocondyla nuda.Ins. Soc. 40:273–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinze, J., B. Hölldobler and C. Peeters, 1994 a. Conflict and cooperation in ant societies.Naturwissenschaften 81:489–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinze, J., D. Ortius, M. Kaib and B. Hölldobler, 1994b. Interspecific aggression in colonies of the slave-making antHarpagoxenus sublaevis.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 35:75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinze, J., B. Hölldobler and S. Trenkle, 1995. Reproductive behavior of the antLeptothorax (Dichothorax) pergandei.Ins. Soc. 42:309–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbers, J. M., 1986. Ecological genetics of queen number inLeptothorax longispinosus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Entomol. gener. 11:119–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbers, J. M. and S. Grieco, 1994. Population structure ofLeptothorax ambiguus, a facultatively polygynous and polydomous ant species.J. Evol. Biol. 7:581–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler, B. and E. O. Wilson, 1990.The Ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. 732pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung, A. C. F., 1973. Reproductive biology in dulotic ants: preliminary report (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Ent. News 84:253–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Masne, G., 1970. Recherches sur la biologie des Fourmis parasites. Le comportement agressif des ouvrières deChalepoxenus.C. R. Acad. Sei. Paris, sér. D 217:1119–1121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonacs, P. and J. E. Tobin, 1992. Selfish larvae: development and the evolution of parasitic behavior in the Hymenoptera.Evolution 46:1605–1620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortius, D., 1993. Untersuchung zur sozialen Struktur unter den Sklaven in gemischten Kolonien vonHarpagoxenus sublaevis. Unpublished Diploma-thesis, Bayerische Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamilo, P., 1991. Evolution of colony characteristics in social insects. II. Number of reproductive individuals.Am. Nat. 138:412–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, B., A. F. Raybould and R. T. Clarke, 1995. Breeding behaviour, relatedness and sex-investment ratios inLeptothorax tuberum Fabricius.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 75:165–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plateaux, L., 1970. Sur le polymorphisme social de la fourmiLeptothorax nylanderi (Förster). 1. Morphologie et biologie comparées des castes.Ann. sci. nat. zool. biol. anim., 12 e série,12:373–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plateaux, L., 1979. Polymorphisme ovarien des reines de fourmisLeptothorax, variations interspécifiques, infériorité d'hybrides interspécifiques.Arch. zool. exp. gén. 120:381–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plateaux, L., 1981. Thepallens morph of the antLeptothorax nylanderi: description, formal genetics, and study populations. In:Biosystematics of Social Insects (P. E. Howse and J.-L. Clément, Eds.). Academic Press, London, pp. 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puchinger, W., 1995. Arbeiterinnenhierarchien in Kolonien der AmeisengattungLeptothorax. Unpublished Diploma-thesis, Bayerische Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratnieks, F. L. W. and H. K. Reeve, 1992. Conflict in single-queen Hymenopteran societies: the structure of conflict and processes that reduce conflict in advanced eusocial species.J. Theor. Biol. 158:33–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seger, J., 1991. Cooperation and conflicts in social insects. In:Behavioral Ecology (J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies, Eds.), 3rd ed., Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 338–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stille, M., B. Stille and P. Douwes, 1991. Polygny, relatedness and nestfounding in the polygynous myrmicine antLeptothorax acervorum (Hymenoptera, Formicidae).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 28:91–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, R. J. and T. M. Alloway, 1985. Behavioural evolution and domestic degeneration in obligatory slave-making ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Leptothoracini).Anim. Behav. 33:1080–1088.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundström, L., 1994. Split sex ratios inFormica ants induced by variable queen mating frequencies.Nature 367:266–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. and H. Hare, 1976. Haplodiploidy and the evolution of the social insects.Science 191:249–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O., 1975.Leptothorax duloticus and the beginnings of slavery in ants.Evolution 29:108–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, U. and A. Buschinger, 1983. The reproductive biology of a slave-maker ant,Epimyrma ravouxi, and a degenerate slave-maker,E. kraussei (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Entomol. gener. 9:1–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heinze, J. The reproductive potential of workers in slave-making ants. Ins. Soc 43, 319–328 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01242933

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01242933

Key words

Navigation