Skip to main content
Log in

Inheritance of resistance to blackmold (Alternaria alternata (Fr.) Keissler) in two interspecific crosses of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum ×L. cheesmanii f.typicum)

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inheritance of resistance to blackmold, a disease of ripe tomato fruit caused byAlternaria alternata, was studied in two interspecific crosses. The parents, F1 and F2 generations of a cross between the susceptibleLycopersicon esculentum Mill. cultivar ‘Hunt 100’ and the resistantL. Cheesmanii f.typicum Riley accession LA 422, and the parents, F1, F2, F3, and BC1 P2 generations of a cross between the susceptibleL. Esculentum cv. ‘VF 145B-7879’ and LA 422 were evaluated. The following disease evaluation traits were used: symptom rating (a symptom severity rating based on visual evaluation of lesions), diseased fruit (the number of diseased fruits divided by the total number of fruit scored), and lesion size (a function derived from the actual lesion diameter). Generation means analysis was used to determine gene action. The data of the ‘Hunt 100’ × LA 422 cross fit an additive-dominance model for all three traits. The ‘VF 145B-7879’ × LA 422 cross data best fit a model that included the additive × additive and additive × dominance interaction components for the trait diseased fruit, whereas higher-order epistatic models would have to be invoked to fit the data for the traits symptom rating and lesion size. A minimum of one gene segregated for all three traits. Broad-sense heritability estimates ranged from 0.09 to 0.16 for all three traits, indicating that selection for improved resistance to blackmold will require selection on a family performance basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Butler EE (1959) Fungi and rots in California canning tomatoes. Plant Dis Rep 43:187–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Casler MD (1982) Genotype × environment interaction bias to offspring-parent regression heritability estimates. Crop Sci 22:540–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis RM, Marois JJ, Mauk P (1990) Control of tomato blackmold with canopy management. Phytopathol News Views 13:6

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr WR (1987) Principles of cultivar development, vol 1: theory and technique. Macmillan Publ Co, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey KJ, Horner T (1957) Heritability in standard units. Agron J 49:59–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble EE (1962) Gene effects in corn (Zea mays L.): I. Separation and relative importance of gene effects for yield. Can J Plant Sci 42:339–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner CO, Lonnquist JH (1959) Linkage and the degree of dominance of genes controlling quantitative characters in maize. Agron J 51:524–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey TC, Hewitt J (1984) A survey ofLycopersicon cheesmanii for high soluble solids. Tomato Gen Coop Rep 34:4–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert NE (1973) Biometrical interpretation. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilchrist DG, Grogan RG (1976) Production and nature of a host-specific toxin fromAlternaria alternata f. sp.lycopersici. Phytopathology 66:165–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Grewal RPS (1988) Genetic basis of resistance to zonate leaf spot disease in forage sorghum. Theor Appl Genet 76:550–554

    Google Scholar 

  • Grogan RG, Kimble AA, Misaghi I (1975) A stem canker disease of tomato caused byAlternaria alternata f. sp.lycopersici. Phytopathology 65:880–886

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall DH, Teviotdale BL, Paulus AO (1980) Blackmold of ripe tomato fruit. University of California, Div Agric Sci Leaflet No. 21154

  • Hayman BI (1958) The separation of epistatic from additive and dominance variation in generation means. Heredity 12:371–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Koepsell PA (1968) The etiology ofGeotrichum andAlternaria molds and their effects on mechanical harvesting of tomato. PhD thesis, University of California, Davis

    Google Scholar 

  • Lush JL (1940) Intra-sire correlations or regressions of offspring on dam as a method of estimating heritability of characteristics. Proc Am Soc Animal Prod 33:293–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather K (1949) Biometrical genetics, 1st edn. Dover Publ, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather K, Jinks JL (1977) Introduction to biometrical genetics. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather K, Jinks JL (1982) Biometrical genetics: the study of continuous variation, 3rd edn. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller JC, Tanksley SD (1990) RFLP analysis of phylogenetic relationships and genetic variation in the genusLycopersicon. Theor Appl Genet 80:437–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyao EM, Hall DH, Somerville P, Blaker N (1986) Fungicidal control of tomato blackmold under rainy conditions. Calif Agric 40:7–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus AO (1991) Alternaria stem canker (black mold). In: Jones JB, Jones JP (eds) Compendium of tomato diseases. APS Press, St. Paul, Minn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson RC, Hall DH (1975) Factors affecting the occurrence and severity of blackmold of ripe tomato fruit caused byAlternaria alternata. Phytopathology 65:1352–1359

    Google Scholar 

  • Rick CM (1979) Biosystematic studies inLycopersicon and closely related species ofSolatium. In: Hawkes JG, Lester RM, Skelding AD (eds) The biology and taxonomy of the Solanaceae. Linnean Soc Symp Ser No 7, pp 667–676

  • Rick CM (1986) Germplasm resources in the wild tomato species. Acta Hortic 190:39–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Rick CM, Yoder JI (1988) Classical and molecular genetics of tomato: highlights and perspectives. Annu Rev Genet 22:281–300

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw DV (1989) Variation among heritability estimates for strawberries obtained by offspring-parent regression with relatives raised in separate environments. Euphytica 44:157–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds NW (1979) Principles of crop improvement. Longman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons EG (1967) Typification ofAlternaria, Stemphylium, andUlocladium. Mycologia 59:67–92

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JD, Kinman ML (1965) The use of parent-offspring regression as an estimator of heritability. Crop Sci 5:595–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Strausbaugh CA, Murray TD (1989) Inheritance of resistance toPseudocercosporella herpotrichoides in three cultivars of winter wheat. Phytopathology 79:1048–1053

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson DL, Rawlings JO, Moll RH (1963) Inheritance and breeding information pertaining to brown spot resistance in corn. Crop Sci 3:511–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel KP, Haskins FA, Gorz HJ (1980) Parent-offspring regression in Indiangrass: inflation of heritability estimates by environmental covariances. Crop Sci 20:580–582

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1968) Evolution and genetics of populations, vol 1: genetics and biometric foundations. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, Z, Houle D, Cockerham CC (1990) How informative is Wright's estimator of the number of genes affecting a quantitative character? Genetics 126:235–247

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by G. E. Hart

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cassol, T., St. Clair, D.A. Inheritance of resistance to blackmold (Alternaria alternata (Fr.) Keissler) in two interspecific crosses of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum ×L. cheesmanii f.typicum). Theoret. Appl. Genetics 88, 581–588 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01240921

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01240921

Key words

Navigation