Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The geographical distribution of plant latex

  • Mini review
  • Published:
CHEMOECOLOGY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Latex is a widespread defence in plants against natural enemies and a literature-based summary of latex-producing angiosperms shows records in 40 families, and more than 20,000 species are estimated to bear laticiferous structures of some kind. This is considerably higher than the usually quoted figure of 12,500 species. There are more tropical than temperate latex-bearing families, both in absolute numbers and proportionally. Proportions of latex-bearing families are similar both in tropical and in more widespread or cosmopolitan families. Significantly more latex-bearing species belong to tropical than either to temperate or to widespread taxa, both in absolute and in relative terms. These differences may be related to the higher diversity of natural enemy species and to higher rates of herbivory in the tropics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agresti A (1990) Categorical Data Analysis. New York: John Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen ON, Allen EK (1981) The Leguminosae. A Sourcebook of Characteristics, Uses and Nodulation. London: Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer BL, Audley BG (1973) Rubber, gutta percha and chicle. Pp 310–343in Miller LP (ed) Phytochemistry. Vol. II: Organic Metabolites. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlquist S (1958) Anatomy of Guayana Mutisieae. II. Mem NY Bot Gdn 10:157–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Coley PD, Bryant JP, Chapin III FS (1985) Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science 230:895–899

    Google Scholar 

  • Coley PD, Aide TM (1991) Comparison of herbivory and plant defenses in temperate and tropical broad-leaved forests. Pp 5–49in Price PW, Lewinsohn TM, Fernandes GW, Benson WW (eds) Plant-Animal Interactions: Evolutionary Ecology in Tropical and Temperate Regions. New York: John Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Compton SG (1987)Aganais speciosa andDanaus chrysippus (Lepidoptera) sabotage the latex defences of their host plants. Ecol Entomol 12:115–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist A (1981) An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. New York: Columbia Univ Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Dussourd DE (1990) The vein drain; or, how insects outsmart plants. Nat Hist 90:44–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Dussourd DE, Eisner T (1987) Vein-cutting behavior: insect counterploy to the latex defense of plants. Science 237:898–901

    Google Scholar 

  • Esau K (1965) Plant Anatomy. 2nd edn. New York: John Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahn A (1979) Secretory Tissues in Plants. London: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahn A (1990) Plant Anatomy. 4th ed. Oxford: Pergamon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell BD, Dussourd DE, Mitter C (1991) Escalation of plant defense: do latex/resin canals spur plant diversification? Am Nat: in press

  • Feeny P (1975) Biochemical coevolution between plants and their insect herbivores. Pp 3–19in Gilbert LE, Raven PH (eds) Coevolution of Animals and Plants. Austin: University of Texas Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel G (1959) The raison d'etre of secondary plant substances. Science 129:1466–1470

    Google Scholar 

  • French JC (1988) Systematic occurrence of anastomosing laticifers in Araceae. Bot Gaz 149:71–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Good R (1974) The Geography of Flowering Plants. 4th ed. London: Longman

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood VR (ed.) (1978) Flowering Plants of the World. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor LD (1969) Lacticiferous vessels in some Papaveraceae. Pp 207–218in Chowdhury KA (ed) Recent Advances in the Anatomy of Tropical Seed Plants. Delhi: Hindustan Publ Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating RC (1970) Comparative anatomy of the Cochlospermaceae II. Anatomy of the young vegetative shoot. Am J Bot 57:889–898

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA (1976) Alkaloid-bearing plants: an ecogeographic perspective. Am Nat 110:261–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA, York BM (1978) The toxicity of plant alkaloids: an ecogeographic perspective. Biochem Syst Ecol 6:61–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewinsohn TM, Vasconcellos-Neto J (1980) Alimentação de crisomelídeos em Asclepiadaceas: um comportamento que reduz a ingestão de substâncias tóxicas. Ciencia e Cultura 32 (Suppl.):497

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewinsohn TM, Vasconcellos-Neto J (1985) Convergência comportamental e padrões coevolutivos de insetos folívoros em plantas latescentes. XII Congresso Brasileiro de Zoologia, Campinas, Resumos: 152–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabberley DJ (1987) The Plant Book: A Portable Dictionary of the Higher Plants. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe CR (1967) Distribution of latex in the plant kingdom. Econ Bot 21:115–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe CR (1983) Laticifers and latex. Pp 70–81in Metcalfe CR. Anatomy of Dicotyledons. 2nd ed. Vol. II. Oxford: Clarendon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira PS, Oliveira-Filho AT (1991) Distribution of extrafloral nectaries in the woody flora of tropical communities in western Brazil. Pp 163–175in Price PW, Lewinsohn TM, Fernandes GW, Benson WW (eds) Plant-Animal Interactions: Evolutionary Ecology in Tropical and Temperate Regions. New York: John Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades DF, Cates RG (1976) Towards a general theory of plant antiherbivore chemistry. Rec Adv Phytochem 10:168–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal GA, Janzen DH (eds) (1979) Herbivores; Their Interaction with Secondary Plant Metabolites. New York: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzini CT (1971) Arvores e Madeiras Úteis do Brazil. São Paulo: Blucher

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzini CT, Mors WB (1976) Botânica Econômica Brasileira. São Paulo: Ed. Pedagógica Universitária and Ed. Universidade de São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruddall PJ (1987) Laticifers in Euphorbiaceae — a conspectus. Bot J Linn Soc 94:143–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleumer HO (1980) Flacourtiaceae. Flora Neotrop 22:1–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins GL (1974) Flowering Plants. Evolution Above the Species Level. London: Edward Arnold

    Google Scholar 

  • Tippo O (1938) Comparative anatomy of the Moraceae and their presumed allies. Bot Gaz 100:1–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Valente MC (1974) Observações sobre a anatomia deEcclinusa balata Ducke. Rodriguesia: 27:7–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Die J (1955) A comparative study of the particle fractions from Apocynaceae latices. Ann Bogor 2:1–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster GL (1975) Conspectus of a new classification of the Euphorbiaceae. Taxon 24:593–601

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster GL (1987) The saga of the spurges: a review of classification and relationships in the Euphorbiales. Bot J Linn Soc 94:3–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilder GJ, Harris DH (1982) Laticifers inCyclanthus bipartitus Poit. (Cyclanthaceae). Bot Gaz 143:84–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis JC (1973) A Dictionary of the Flowering Plants and Ferns. 8th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratório de Interações Insetos/Plantas, Departamento Zoologia, UNICAMP, 13081, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil

    Thomas M. Lewinsohn

  2. NERC Centre for Population Biology, Imperial College, Silwood Park, SL5 7PY, Ascot, Berkshire, United Kingdom

    Thomas M. Lewinsohn

Authors
  1. Thomas M. Lewinsohn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lewinsohn, T.M. The geographical distribution of plant latex. Chemoecology 2, 64–68 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01240668

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01240668

Key words

Search

Navigation