Skip to main content
Log in

Distribution patterns of muscle fibre types in major muscles of the bull (Bos taurus)

  • Published:
Anatomy and Embryology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The study describes the variations in distribution and cross-sectional area (fibre size) of three muscle fibre types (I, IIA, IIB) in 34 of the largest muscles of the bull (Bos taurus). The animals had been kept strictly unexercised for one year before slaughter. Representative sampling was done at 15 positions within each muscle, and from 2700 to 4500 fibres were analysed in each muscle. Different intermuscular patterns are described. The overall volume fraction (%) of type I fibres was about 10% higher in the forepart muscles than in the hindpart muscles (41% and 31%, respectively), while the mean content of type IIB fibres was similar. Type I fibres were particularly abundant in antigravity muscles. Of these, the hindlimb muscles contained 50% more type I fibres (by weight) than those of the forelimb. Typical antigravity antagonists contained very few type I fibres. In the thigh cross-section the proportion of type I fibres was highest in the anterior and medial parts, while the IIB fibres tended to be concentrated in the superficial and posterior parts. Intramuscular patterns were revealed, with type I fibres becoming gradually more abundant from superficial to deep regions, while IIB fibres had an opposite distribution. This was particularly evident in the thigh proper and in the scapular region. Within each fasciculus of all the muscles, the I fibres in the muscles of the forepart were on average about 15% larger than those of the muscles in the hindpart. The IIB fibres were on average about 10% larger in the hindpart than in the forepart muscles. A covariation between the proportion of type I and IIB fibres and their cross-sectional area was indicated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ariano MA, Armstrong RB, Edgerton VR (1973) Hindlimb muscle fiber populations of five mammals. J Histochem Cytochem 21:51–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong RB (1980) Properties and distributions of the fiber types in the locomotory muscles of mammals. In: Schmith-Nielsen K, Taylor CR (eds) Comparative physiology: primitive mammals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 243–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong RB, Phelps RO (1984) Muscle fiber type composition of the rat hindlimb. Am J Anat 171:259–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong RB, Saubert CW, Seeherman HJ, Taylor CR (1982) Distribution of fiber types in locomotory muscles of dogs. Am J Anat 163:87–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooke MH, Kaiser KK (1970) Three “myosin ATPase” systems. The nature of their pH liability and sulphydryl dependence. J Histochem Cytochem 18:670–672

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke RE (1981) Motor units: Anatomy, physiology and functional organization. In: Brooks VB (ed) Handbook of physiology. The nervous system. Am Physiol Soc, Bethesda, Md. Sect. 1, pp 345–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke RE, Edgerton VR (1975) Motor unit properties and selective involvement in movement. Exercise Sport Sci Rev 3:31–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Calkins CR, Dutson TR, Smith GC, Carpenter ZL, Davis GW (1981) Relationship of fiber type composition to marbling and tenderness of bovine muscles. J Food Sci 46:708–710

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassens RG, Cooper CC (1971) Red and white muscle. Adv Food Res 19: 1–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Close RI (1972) Dynamic properties of mammalian skeletal muscles. Physiol Rev 52:129–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornforth DP, Hecker AL, Cramer DA, Spindler AA, Mathias MM (1980) Maturity and its relationships to muscle characteristics of cattle. J Anim Sci 50:75–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyer JH, Naude RT, Henning JWN, Rossouw E (1977) The influence of breed, castration and age on muscle fibre type and diameter in Friesland and Afrikaner cattle. S Afr J Sci 7:171–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberger W, Baum H, Dittrich O (1925) Handbuch der Anatomie der Tiere fur Künstler, 3rd edn. Dietrich, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Essen-Gustavson B, Fjelkner-Modig S (1985) Skeletal muscle characteristics in different breeds of pigs in relation to sensory properties of meat. Meat Sci 13:33–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Grotmol S, Totland GK, Kryvi H (1988) A general, computer-based method for study of the spatial distribution of muscle fiber types in skeletal muscle. Anat Embryol 177:421–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen S, Cutts JH, Krause WJ, Cutts III JH (1987) Distribution of fibre types in thirty-seven muscles of Didelphis virginiana. Anat Anz 164:153–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand M (1959) Motion of the running cheetah and horse. J Mammal 40:481–738

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand M (1965) Symmetrical gaits of horses. Science 150:701–708

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt MC, Hedrick HB (1977) Profile of fiber types and related properties of five bovine muscles. J Food Sci 42:513–517

    Google Scholar 

  • James NT (1971) The distribution of muscle fibre types in fasciculi and their analysis. J Anat 110:335–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Lexell J, Downham D, Sjøstrøm M (1983) Distribution of different fiber types in human skeletal muscles. A statistical and computational model for the study of fiber type grouping and early diagnosis of skeletal muscle fiber denervation and reinnervation. J Neurol Sci 61:301–314

    Google Scholar 

  • May ML, Dikeman ME, Schalles R (1977) Longissimus muscle histological characteristics of Simmental X Angus, Hereford X Angus and Limousin X Angus crossbred steers as related to carcass composition and meat palatability traits. J Anim Sci 44:571–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsholme SJ, Lexell J, Downham DY (1988) Distribution of fibre types and fibre sizes in the tibialis cranialis muscle of beagle dogs. J Anat 160:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickel R, Schummer A, Seiserle E, Frewein J, Wilkens H, Wille KH (1986) The locomotor system of the domestic animals. Paul Parey, Berlin Hamburg, pp 500

    Google Scholar 

  • Novikoff AB, Shin W, Drucker J (1961) Mitochondrial localization of oxidative enzymes. Staining results with two tetrazolium salts. J Biophys Biochem Cytol 9:47–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Pette D, Staron RS (1990) Cellular and molecular diversities of mammalian skeletal muscle fibers. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 116:2–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Popescu P (1986) Atlas of topographical anatomy of the domestic animals, vol 3. Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltin B, Gollnick PD (1983) Skeletal muscle adaptability: significance for metabolism and performance. In: Peachey LD (ed) Handbook of physiology. Skeletal muscle. Am Physiol Soc, Bethesda Sect 10, pp 55–631

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector SA, Gardiner RF, Zernicke RR, Roy RR, Edgerton VR (1980) Muscle architecture and the force velocity characteristics of the cat soleus and medial gastrocnemius: implications for motor control. J Neurophysiol 44:951–960

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrant PV (1981) In: Hood DE, Tarrant PV (eds) The problem of dark-cutting in beef. Nijhoff, Haag

    Google Scholar 

  • Totland GK, Slinde E, Kryvi H (1988) Composition of muscle fiber types and connective tissue in bovine m. semitendinosus and its relation to tenderness. Meat Sci 23:303–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Weibel ER, Elias H (1967) Quantitative methods in morphology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Young OA (1984) The biochemical basis of fibre types in bovine muscle. Meat Sci 11:123–137

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Totland, G.K., Kryvi, H. Distribution patterns of muscle fibre types in major muscles of the bull (Bos taurus). Anat Embryol 184, 441–450 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01236050

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01236050

Key words

Navigation