Skip to main content
Log in

Frobenius splitting and invariant theory

  • Published:
Transformation Groups Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider varieties over an algebraically closed field k of characteristicp>0. Given a linear representation of a reductive group, we prove that the ring of invariants is F-regular provided the associated projective quotient is Frobenius-split, the twisting sheaves are Cohen-Macaulay (C-M), and a mild technical condition is met. As an example of how this can be used, we show that the ring of invariants (under the adjoint action of SL (3)) ofg copies ofM 3 is C-M. (HereM 3 denotes the vector space of 3×3 matrices over k andp>3.) The method of proof involves an induction, and is potentially of wide applicability. As a corollary we obtain that the moduli space of rank 3 and degree 0 bundles on a smooth projective curve of genusg is C-M.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • [A] M. Artin,On Azumaya algebras and finite-dimensional representations of rings, J. Algebra11 (1964), 532–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • [B-H] W. Bruns and J. Herzog,Cohen-Macaulay Rings, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics39, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • [B-R] P. Bardsley and R. W. Richardson,Étale slices for algebraic transformation groups in characteristic p, Proc. London Math. Soc.51 (1985), 295–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Bo] J. F. Boutot,Frobenius et cohomologie locale, Séminaire Bourbaki 453 (1974/75).

  • [EGA-II] A. Grothendieck and J. Dieudonné,Éléments de Géométrie Algébrique II, Publ. Math. IHES8 (1961).

  • [F-W] R. Fedder and K. Watanabe,A characterisation of F-regularity in terms of F-purity, Commutative Algebra, Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ., vol. 15, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • [H-H] M. Hochster and C. Huneke,Tightly closed ideals, Bull. Am. Math. Soc.18 (1988), 45–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Ma] O. Mathieu,Filtrations of G-modules, Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup.23 (1990), 625–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • [M-R1] V. B. Mehta and A. Ramanathan,Frobenius splitting and cohomology vanishing for Schubert varieties. Ann. of Math.122 (1985), 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • [M-R2] V. B. Mehta and A. Ramanathan,Schubert varieties in G/B x G/B, Comp. Math.67 (1988), 355–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • [M-TR] V. B. Mehta and T. R. Ramadas,Moduli of vector bundles, Frobenius splitting, and invariant theory, Ann. of Math.144 (1996), 269–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • [N-TR] M. S. Narasimhan and T. R. Ramadas,Factorisation of generalised theta functions I, Invent. Math.114 (1993), 565–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • [S] G. Schwarz,Lifting differential operators from orbit spaces, Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup.28 (1995), 253–306.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We thank the referees for their patient reading of the manuscript and suggestions regarding the exposition.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mehta, V.B., Ramadas, T.R. Frobenius splitting and invariant theory. Transformation Groups 2, 183–195 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01235940

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01235940

Keywords

Navigation