Skip to main content
Log in

Incentive compatibility and the quantity-setting competitive firm under demand uncertainty

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the tie between the popular “black box” neoclassical quantity-setting firm under demand uncertainty and a firm with a rudimentary but explicit “employee relation” organizational structure in which workers are offered fixed wages for following management directives. Surprisingly, the quantity-setting firm unambiguously mimics optimal employment relation hiring and work rules when the contract is incentive-compatible ex post. The attitude toward risk is shown to be the key determinant of whether or not the quantity-setting firm replicates the optimal employment relation contract when ex post incentive-compatibility is relaxed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appelbaum, E., and Katz, E. (1986): “Measures of Risk Aversion and Comparative Statics of Industry Equilibrium.”American Economic Review 76: 524–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batra, R. N., and Ullah, A. (1974): “Competitive Firm and the Theory of Input Demand under Price Uncertainty.”Journal of Political Economy 82: 537–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drago, R., and Turnbull, G. K. (1991): “Market Incentives and Work Incentives: The Question of Flexible Production.”International Economic Review 32: 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, R. (1976): “Factor Demand with Output Price Uncertainty.”American Economic Review 66: 675–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holthausen, D. M. (1976): “Input Choices and Uncertain Demand.”American Economic Review 66: 94–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishii, Y. (1989): “Measures of Risk Aversion and Comparative Statics of Industry Equilibrium: Correction.”American Economic Review 79: 285–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazear, E., and Rosen, S. (1981): “Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts.”Journal of Political Economy 89: 841–864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nalbantian, H. R. (Ed.) (1988):Incentives, Cooperation, and Risk Sharing. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nalebuff, B., and Stiglitz, J. (1983): “Prizes and Incentives: Towards a General Theory of Compensation and Competition.”Bell Journal of Economics 14: 21–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menezes, C. F., and Hanson, D. L. (1970): “On the Theory of Risk Aversion.”International Economic Review 11: 481–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandmo, A. (1971): “On the Theory of the Competitive Firm Under Price Uncertainty.”American Economic Review 61: 65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, C., and Stiglitz, J. (1984): “Equilibrium Unemployment as a Worker Discipline Device.”American Economic Review 74: 433–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1951): “A Formal Theory of the Employment Relationship.”Econometrica 19: 293–305.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turnbull, G.K. Incentive compatibility and the quantity-setting competitive firm under demand uncertainty. Journal of Economics Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 58, 77–90 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01234802

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01234802

Keywords

Navigation