Abstract
This review summarizes the clinical and pathological findings of 52 cases of hepatic angiomyolipoma to discern and establish the most pertinent clinical and pathologic characteristics of the tumor. The disease was symptomatic in 60% of the patients. Abdominal pain or distress was the most common symptom, appearing in 37% of the patients, followed by malaise and upper abdominal mass or hepatomegaly. Of the 52 patients, only three (5.8%) showed associated tuberous sclerosis. Antemortem diagnosis of the tumor has been made with increasing frequency with the recent advent of computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US). The tumor was usually visualized as a hyperechoic mass by US imaging and as a low density mass less than -20 Housefield units by CT, and was hypervascular on angiography. The tumor was usually yellow to light tan, depending on the amount of fat tissue. Histologically, the tumor was characterized by an admixture of mature fat cells, blood vessels, and smooth muscle cells, with occasional foci of extramedullary hematopoiesis. The aumount of smooth muscle component varied and often exhibited hypercellularity, pleomorphism with occasional bizarre giant cells, and moderate mitotic activity. These features are considered conducive to an erroneous diagnosis of malignant tumor. However, since no malignant counterpart has been reported, it can easily be accurately differentiated histologically, if one is aware of the entity and can identify the three components of the tumor; blood vessels, smooth muscle cells, and fat. With regard to the histogenesis of angiomyolipoma, primitive mesenchymal cells around blood vessels may be the precursor cells.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ishak KG. Mesenchymal tumors of the liver. In: Okuda K, Peters RL (eds) Hepatocellular carcinoma. New York: Wiley Medical, 1976;247–307.
Hagiwara T, Nagata I, Yoshizaki I, et al. A rare hepatic tumor, suspected primary liver tumor preoperatively (abstract, in Japanese). Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg 1980; 13:439.
Pounder DJ. Hepatic angiomyolipoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1982;6:677–681.
Kawarada Y, Mizumoto R. Angiomyolipoma of the liver. Am J Gastroenterol 1983;78:434–439.
Goodman ZD, Ishak KG. Angiomyolipoma of the liver. Am J Surg Pathol 1984;8:745–750.
Ueda Y, Mimura H, Tsumura M, et al. A case of hepatic artery aneurysm with a big hepatic angiomyolipoma (in Japanese). Acta Hepatol Jpn 1984;25:925–930.
Grippom P, Desaint B, Herve de Sigalon JP, et al. Angiomyolipome du foie. Une decouverte echographique fortuite. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1985;9:88–89.
Keida Y, Miyagi M, Shahana T, et al. A case of hepatic angiomyolipoma (abstract, in Japanese). Jpn J Gastroenterol 1986;83:290.
Nakashima K, Kimura T, Kojima H, et al. A case of hepatic angiomyolipoma (abstract, in Japanese). Jpn J Gastroenterol 1986;83:290–291.
Hirano T, Korematsu M, Moronaga Y, et al. A case of hepatic angiomyolipoma (abstract, in Japanese). J Jpn Soc Clin Cytol 1987;26:333.
Takayasu K, Shima Y, Muramatsu Y, et al. Imaging characteristics of large lipoma and angiomyolipoma of the liver. Case reports. Cancer 1987;59:916–921.
Blumgart RL, Payne M, Rhodes AH. Angiomyolipoma of the liver. Clin Radiol 1987;38:329–330.
Liessi G. Lipomi ed angiomiolipomi del fegato. Radiol Med (Torino) 1987;74:471–473.
Miyahara M, Kobayashi M, Tada I, et al. Giant hepatic angiomyolipoma simulating focal nodular hyperplasia. Jpn J Surg 1988;18:346–350.
Fobbe F, Hamm B, Schwarting R. Angiomyolipoma of the liver: CT, MR, and ultrasound imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1988;12:658–659.
Aoki Y, Hirai K, Sakado S, et al. A case of hepatic angiomyolipoma (in Japanese with English abstract). Acta Hepatol Jpn 1987;28:966–970.
Naito M, Yamamura F, Takahashi K, et al. Hepatic angiomyolipoma. A case report with review of the literature. Acta Pathol Jpn 1988;38:799–804.
Suga K, Ito S, Itose K, et al. A case of hepatic angiomyolipoma (in Japanese). Gastroenterol Surg 1988;11:101–104.
Okada K, Yokoyama S, Nakayama I, et al. An electron microscopic study of hepatic angiomyolipoma. Acta Pathol Jpn 1989;39:743–749.
Kristal H, Sperber F. Hepatic angiomyolipoma in a tuberous sclerosis patient. Isr J Med Sci 1989;25:412–414.
Nguyen GK, Catzavelos C. Solitary angiomyolipoma of the liver. Report of a case initially examined by fine needle aspiration biopay. Acta Cytol 1989;34:201–204.
Ohmori T, Arita N, Uraga N, et al. Giant hepatic angiomyolipoma. Histopathology 1989;15:540–543.
Schwartz P, Travers P, Hunt DR. Angiomyolipoma of the liver. Aust NZ J Surg 1989;59:969–971.
Robinson J, Grant EG, Haller JO, Cohen HL. Hepatic angiomyolipoma in tuberous sclerosis. Report of two cases. J Ultrasound Med 1989;8:575–578.
Yokoyama S, Nakayama I, Okada K, et al. Three cases of hepatic angiomyolipoma (in Japanese with English abstract). Pathol Clin Med 1990;8:121–128.
Miyazaki T, Katehana T, Hachi M, et al. A case of hepatic angiomyolipoma (abstract, in Japanese). Acta Hepatol Jpn 1990;31:999.
Fujiwara S, Okamoto E, Toyosaka A, et al. Two cases of hepatic angiomyolipoma (abstract, in Japanese). Acta Hepatol Jpn 1990;31:999.
Yamagiwa K, Higashikuchi T, Yokoi H, et al. Two cases of hepatic angiomyolipoma and hepatic malignant mixed tumor (abstract, in Japanese). Acta Hepatol Jpn 1990;31:1000.
Linton PL, Ahn WS, Schwartz ME, et al. Angiomyolipoma of the liver: Immunohistochemical study of a case. Liver 1991;11:158–161.
Tanabe Y, Yoshida K, Shinomiya S, et al. A case of hepatic angiomyolipoma simulating hepatocellular carcinoma on diagnostic imagings due to atypical histological findings (in Japanese). Jpn J Gastroenterol 1991;88:1608–1611.
Weeks DA, Malott RL, Arnesen M, et al. Hepatic angiomyolipoma with striated granules and positivity with melanomaspecific antibody (HMB-45): A report of two cases. Ultrastructural Pathol 1991;15:563–571.
Tsui WMS, Yuen AKT, Ma KF, Tse CCH. Hepatic angiomyolipoma with a deceptive trabecular pattern and HMB-45 reactivity. Histopathology 1992;21:569–573.
Akatsu J, Tanaka H, Unoki H, et al. A case of hepatic angiomyolipoma mimicking a small liver cancer (in Japanese with English abstract). Jpn J Gastroenrol 1992;89:1305–1309.
Nonomura A, Mizukami Y, Isobe M, et al. Smallest angiomyolipoma of the liver in the oldest patient. Liver 1993;13:51–53.
Bennington JL, Beckwith JB. Tumors of the kidney, renal pelvis, and ureter. In: Firminger HI (ed) Atlas of tumor pathology, second series, fascicle 12. Washington, D.C. Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1975;204–212.
Critchley M, Earl CJC. Tuberous sclerosis and allied conditions. Brain 1932;55:311–346.
Bret PM, Bretagnolle M, Gaillard D, et al. Small, asymptomatic angiomyolipoma of the kidney. Radiology 1985;154:7–10.
Prez-Atayde AR, Iwaya S, Lack EE. Angiomyolipomas and polycystic renal disease in tuberous sclerosis. Ultrastructural observations. Urology 1981;17:607–610.
Holm-Nielsen P, Sörensen B. Renal angiomyolipoma: An ultrastructural investigation of three cases with histogenetic considerations. APMIS 1988;4[Suppl. 4]:37–47.
Wassermann F. The development of adipose tissue. In: Renold AE, Cahill GF (eds) Handbook of physiology. Sect. 5. Adipose tissue Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins 1965;87–100.
Rhodin JAG. Ultrastructure of mammalian venous capillaries, venules, and small collecting veins. J Ultrastruct Res 1968;25:452–500.
Callea F, Mebis J, Desmet VJ. Myofibroblasts in focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver. Virchows Arch [A] 1982;396:155–166.
Pea M, Bonetti F, Zamboni G, et al. Melanocyte marker HMB-45 is regularly expressed in angiomyolipoma of the kidney. Pathology 1991;23:185–188.
Yum M, Ganguly A, Donohue JP. Juxtaglomerular cells in renal angiomyolipoma. Ultrastructural observation. Urology 1984;24:283–286.
Wang J, Dhillon AP, Sankey EA, et al. “Neuroendocrine” differentiation in primary neoplasm of the liver. J Pathol 1991: 163:61–67.
Nonomura A, Kono N, Mizukami Y, et al. Duct-acinar-islet cell tumor of the pancreas. Ultrastruct Pathol 1992;16:317–329.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nonomura, A., Mizukami, Y. & Kadoya, M. Angiomyolipoma of the liver: A collective review. J Gastroenterol 29, 95–105 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01229084
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01229084