Skip to main content
Log in

Single-sweep analysis using an autoregressive with exogenous input (ARX) model

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Single-sweep visual evoked potential analysis would be useful in clinical electro-physiology practice because it would make possible the evaluation of transient phenomena, but recording single-sweep visual evoked potentials is difficult because of the low signal-noise ratio. To increase this ratio we used a filter based on an autoregressive with exogenous input model. We studied a group of 12 diabetic patients matched with a control group of 14 normal subjects. The model, in most cases, allowed us to extrapolate the P100 component from each single sweep of visual evoked potential. The visual evoked potential values obtained by means of averaging were not significantly different in the groups studied, but single-sweep analysis showed different distribution of the P100 component amplitude. The preliminary results of our study evidenced differences in the amplitude and latency distribution of normal and diabetic subjects, thus confirming the power of this new technique and its ability to obtain some information that is masked by the averaging method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Electroencephalographic Society, Guidelines for clinical evoked potential studies. J Clin Neurophysiol 1984; 1: 3–53.

    Google Scholar 

  2. McGillem CD, Aunon JL, Yu K. Signal and noise in evoked brain potentials. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1985; 32: 1012–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McGillem CD, Aunon JL, Childers DG. Signal processing in evoked potential research: Application of filtering and pattern recognition. CRC Crit Rev Bioeng 1981; 6: 225–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McGillem CD, Aunon JL. Measurement of signal components in single visually evoked brain potentials. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1977; 24: 232–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aunon JL, McGillem CD, Childers DG. Signal processing in evoked potential research. Averaging and modelling. CRC Crit Rev Bioeng 1981; 5: 323–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Childers DG, Perry NW, Fischler IS, Boaz T, Arroyo AA. Event related potentials. A critical review of methods for single trial detection. CRC Crit Rev Biomed Eng 1987; 14: 185–200.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cerutti S, Baselli D, Liberati D, Pavesi G. Single sweep analysis of visual evoked potentials through a model of parametric identification. Biol Cybernet 1987; 56: 111–20.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Early photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy. ETRDS report No. 9. Ophthalmology 1991; 98: 766–85.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zetterberg LH. Estimation on parameters for a linear difference equation with application to EEG analysis. Math Biosci 1969; 5: 227–37.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Magni, R., Giunti, S., Bianchi, A. et al. Single-sweep analysis using an autoregressive with exogenous input (ARX) model. Doc Ophthalmol 86, 95–104 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01224631

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01224631

Key words

Navigation