Skip to main content
Log in

Tight versus loose scleral flap closure in trabeculectomy surgery

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thirty-two consecutive trabeculectomy patients were randomized to receive a tight scleral flap closure (15 eyes) with postoperative laser suture lysis, or a loose scleral flap closure (18 eyes) to determine differences in the surgical results. Three months postoperatively no statistical difference in intraocular pressure (loose closure 15.1 ± 3.3 mm Hg, tight closure 15.0 ± 3.6 mm Hg,p > 0.05) or number of glaucoma medicines (loose closure 1.6, tight closure 1.3,p > 0.05) existed between treatment groups. In the early postoperative period, no statistical difference between groups was observed in the anterior chamber depth, visual acuity or intraocular pressure (p > 0.05). Laser suture lysis was performed without complication in nine patients with a statistically significant reduction in intraocular pressure (p < 0.01). This study suggests, by the technique used, that no obvious benefit exists in using a tight versus a loose scleral flap closure when performing a trabeculectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shields MB. Textbook of Glaucoma, 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1992: 591–5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stewart WC. Clinical Practice of Glaucoma. Thorofare NJ: SLACK, Inc., 1990: 341–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stewart WC, Shields MB. Management of anterior chamber depth after trabeculectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 1988; 106: 41–4.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hoskins HD, Migliazzo C. Management of failing filtering blebs with the argon laser. Ophthalmic Surg 1984; 15: 731–3.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Melamed S, Ashkenazi I, Glovinski J, Blumenthal M. Tight scleral flap trabeculectomy with postoperative laser suture lysis. Am J Ophthalmol 1990; 109: 303–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Savage JA, Condon GP, Lytle RA, Simmons RJ. Laser suture lysis after trabeculectomy. Ophthalmology 1988; 95: 1631–8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shields MB. Trabeculectomy vs full-thickness filtering operation for control of glaucoma. Ophthalmic Surg 1980; 11: 498–505.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stewart RH, Kimbrough RL, Bachh H, Allbright M. Trabeculectomy and modifications of trabeculectomy. Ophthalmic Surg 1979; 10: 76–80.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Krug JH, Melamed S. Adjunctive use of delayed and adjustable low-dose 5—fluorouracil in refractory glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1990; 109: 412–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bluestein, E.C., Stewart, W.C. Tight versus loose scleral flap closure in trabeculectomy surgery. Doc Ophthalmol 84, 379–385 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01215452

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01215452

Key words

Navigation