Skip to main content
Log in

A common value auction model with endogenous entry and information acquisition

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Economic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Much of the auction literature assumes both a fixed number of bidders and a fixed information setting. This sidesteps the important and often costly decisions a potential bidder must make prior to an auction: Should I enter and, if I do, what level of resources should I expend evaluating the good prior to bidding? We answer these questions for a stylized information model of a common value auction. The expected selling price is shown to be the expected value of the good minus the expected aggregate entry and information costs of the bidders. Thus, the seller indirectly pays for these costs to the bidders. There are auctions where the seller seemingly restricts the bidders' information expenditures. While this restriction does influence the entry decision, we demonstrate that the overall effect can be to improve the selling price. Finally, the probability of entry and the chosen accuracy of the information are never more in the second-price auction than in the first-price auction, and the seller prefers the second-price auction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blumenthal, M.: Auctions with constrained information: blind bidding for motion pictures. Rev. Econ. Stat.70, 191–198 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cassady, R. Jr.: Auctions and auctioneering. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press 1967

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chatterjee, K., Harrison, T.: The value of information in competitive bidding. Eur. J. Operat. Res.36, 322–333 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  4. French, K., McCormick, R.: Sealed bids, sunk costs, and the process of competition. J. Business57, 417–441 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harstad, R.: Alternative common-value auction procedures: revenue comparisons with free entry. J. Polit. Econ.98, 421–429 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hausch, D., Li, L.: A common value auction model with endogenous entry and information acquisition. Manuscript (1991)

  7. Hausch, D., Li, L.: Private values auctions with endogenous information: revenue equivalence and non-equivalence. Manuscript (1991)

  8. Hendricks, K., Porter, R., Boudreau, B.: Information, returns, and bidding behavior in OCS auctions: 1954–1969. J. Industr. Econ.XXXV, 517–542 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lee, T.: Competition and information acquisition in first price auctions. Econ. Lett.18, 129–132 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lee, T.: Incomplete information, high-low bidding and public information in first price auctions. Management Sci.30, 1490–1496 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Levin, D., Smith, J. L.: Equilibrium in auctions with entry. Manuscript, University of Houston 1991)

  12. Matthews, S.: Information acquisition in discriminatory auctions. In: Boyer, M., Kihlstrom, R. (eds.) Bayesian models in economic theory. Amsterdam: North-Holland 1984

    Google Scholar 

  13. McAfee, R. P., McMillan, J.: Auctions and bidding. J. Econ. Lit.XXV, 699–738 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Milgrom, P.: Rational expectations, information acquisition, and competitive bidding. Econometrica49, 921–943 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Milgrom, P.: Auction theory. In: Bewley, T. (ed.) Advances in economic theory. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press 1986

    Google Scholar 

  16. Milgrom, P., Weber, R.: A theory of auctions and competitive bidding. Econometrica50, 1089–1122 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Samuelson, W.: Competitive bidding with entry costs. Econ. Lett.17, 53–57 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Smiley, A.: Competitive bidding under uncertainty: the case of offshore oil. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Col. 1979

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wilson, R.: Strategic analysis of auctions. In: Aumann, R., Hart, S. (eds.) Handbook of game theory. Amsterdam: North-Holland, forthcoming

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We are grateful for the comments and suggestions of seminar participants at the University of British Columbia, Dartmouth College, the University of Wisconsin, Yale University, and the International Conference on Game Theory and Economics at SUNY Stony Brook.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hausch, D.B., Li, L. A common value auction model with endogenous entry and information acquisition. Econ Theory 3, 315–334 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01212920

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01212920

Keywords

Navigation