Skip to main content
Log in

Source analysis of median nerve and finger stimulated somatosensory evoked potentials: Multichannel simultaneous recording of electric and magnetic fields combined with 3d-MR tomography

  • Published:
Brain Topography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

At the current state of technology, multichannel simultaneous recording of combined electric potentials and magnetic fields should constitute the most powerful tool for separation and localization of focal brain activity. We performed an explorative study of multichannel simultaneous electric SEPs and magnetically recorded SEFs. MEG only sees tangentially oriented sources, while EEG signals include the entire activity of the brain. These characteristics were found to be very useful in separating multiple sources with overlap of activity in time. The electrically recorded SEPs were adequately modelled by three equivalent dipoles located: (1) in the region of the brainstem, modelling the P14 peak at the scalp, (2) a tangentially oriented dipole, modelling the N20-P20 and N30-P30 peaks, and part of the P45, and (3) a radially oriented dipole, modelling the P22 peak and part of the P45, both located in the region of the somatosensory cortex. Magnetically recorded SEFs were adequately modelled by a single equivalent dipole, modelling the N20-P20 and N30-P30 peaks, located close to the posterior bank of the central sulcus, in area 3b (mean deviation: 3 mm). The tangential sources in the electrical data were located 6 mm on average from the area 3b. MEG and EEG was able to locate the sources of finger stimulated SEFs in accordance with the somatotopic arrangement along the central fissure. A combined analysis demonstrated that MEG can provide constraints to the orientation and location of sources and helps to stabilize the inverse solution in a multiple-source model of the EEG.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achim, A., Richer, F. and Saint-Hilaire, J.M. Methods for separating temporally overlapping sources of neuroelectric data. Brain Topography, 1988, 1: 22–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, T., McCarthy, G., Wood, C.C. and Jones, S.J. Potentials evoked in human and monkey cerebral cortex by stimulation of the median nerve. Brain, 1991, 114: 2465–2503.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, C., Barth, D.S., Levesque, M.F. and Sutherling, W.W. Functional anatomy of human hand sensorimotor cortex from spatio temporal analysis of electrocorticography. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1991, 78: 56–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, C., Doppelbauer, A., Deecke, L., Barth, D.S., Zeitlhofer, J., Lindinger, G. and Sutherling, W.W. Neuromagnetic investigation of somatotopy of human hand somatosensory cortex. Exp. Brain Res., 1991, 87: 641–648.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, C. Sutherling, W.W., Di, S. and Barth, D.S. Spatiotemporal modeling of cerebral evoked magnetic fields to median nerve stimulation. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1991, 79: 27–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buchner, H., Adams, L., Knepper, A., Rüger, R., Laborde, G., Ludwig, I., Reul, J. and Scherg, M. Pre-operative determination of the central sulcus by dipole source analysis of early somatosensory evoked potentials and 3D-NMR-tomography. J. Neurochir., in press.

  • Buchner, H., Adams, L., Müller, A., Ludwig, I., Knepper, A., Thron, A., Niemann, K. and Scherg, M. Somatotopy of human hand somatosensory cortex revealed by dipole source analysis of early somatosensory evoked potentials and 3D-NMR-tomography. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., in press.

  • Buchner, H. and Scherg, M. Analyse der Generatoren früher kortikaler somatosensibel evozierter Potentiale (N. medianus) mit der Dipolquellenanalyse: Erste Ergebnisse. Z. EEG-EMG, 1991, 22: 52–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broughton, R.J. Discussion. In: E. Donchin and D.B. Lindsley (Eds.), Average evoked potentials (NASA SP-191), US Government printing office, Washington, 1969: 79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheron, G. and Borenstein, S. Specific gating of the early somatosensory evoked potentials during active movement. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1987, 67: 537–548.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheron, G. and Borenstein, S. Mental movement simulation affects the N30 frontal component of the somatosensory evoked potentials. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1992, 84: 288–292.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. and Cuffin, B.N. Demonstration of useful differences between magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1983, 56: 38–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D., Cuffin, B.N., Yunokuchi, K., Maniewski, R., Purcell, C., Cosgrove, G.R., Ives, J., Kennedy, J.G. and Schomer, D.L. MEG versus EEG localization test using implanted sources in the human brain. Ann. Neurol., 1990, 28: 811–817.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cuffin, B.N. and Cohen, D. Comparison of the magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1979, 47: 132–146.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cuffin, B.N., Cohen, D., Yunokuchi, K., Maniewsi, R., Purcell, C., Cosgrove, G.R., Ives, J., Kennedy, J. and Schomer, D. Tests of EEG localisation accuracy using implanted sources in the human brain. Ann. Neurol., 1991, 29: 132–138.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Desmedt, J.E. Somatosensory Evoked Potential. In: T.W. Picton (Ed.), EEG-Handbook. vol 3. Human Event — Related Potentials, Elsevier, New York, Amsterdam, 1988: 245–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmedt, J.E. and Tomberg, C. Mapping early somatosensory evoked potentials in selective attention: critical evaluation of control conditions used for titrating by difference the cognitive P30. P40. P100 and N140. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1989, 74: 321–346.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dössel, M., David, B., Fuchs, M., Krüger, J., Kullmann, W.H. and Lüdeke, K.M. A modular approach to multichannel magnetometery. Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas., 1991, 12: 75–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dössel, O., David, B., Fuchs, M., Krüger, J., Kullmann, W.H. and Lüdeke, K.M. A modular 19-channel SQUID system for biomagnetic measurements. In: H. Koch and H. Lübbig (Eds.), Proc. in Phys. Supercond. devices and their appl., 1992, Vol. 64: 517–520.

  • Dössel, O., David, M., Fuchs, M., Küger, J., Lüdeke, K.M. and Wischmann, H.-A. A 31-channel SQUID system for biomagnetic measurements. Applied Superconductivity, 1993, Vol. 1, No. 10–12: 1813–1825.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebeling, U., Schmidt, U.D. and Reulen, H.J. Tumor-surgery within the central motor strip: surgical results with the aid of electrical motor cortex stimulation. Acta Neurochir., 1989, 101: 100–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fender, D.H. Source localization of brain electrical activity. In: A.S. Gevins and A. Remond (Eds.), EEG Handbook, Vol. 1, Elsevier, New York, Amsterdam, 1987: 355–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fender, D.H. Models of the human brain and the surrounding media: their influence on the reliability of source localization. J. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1991, 8: 381–390.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franssen, H., Stegeman, D.F., Moleman, J. and Schoobaar, R.P. Dipole modelling of median nerve SEPs in normal subjects and patients with small subcortical infarcts. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1992, 84: 401–417.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, W.J. Mass action in the nervous system. Academic Press, New York, 1975: 1–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, M. and Dössel, O. Online head position determination for MEG-measurement. In: M. Hoke, S.N. Erne, Y.C. Okada and G.L. Romani (Eds.), Biomagnetism: Clinical Aspects, Elsevier, New York, Amsterdam, 1992: 869–873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, M., Wischmann, H.-A. and Dössel, O. Overlay of neuromagnetic current density images and morphological MR images. SPIE., 1992, 1808: 676–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, M., Wischmann, H.-A. and Dössel, O. Overlay of biomagnetic current reconstructions and morphological MR images. IEEE. Proc. Neuroscience and Technology, Lyon, 1992: 56–59.

  • Giard, M.H., Peronnet, F., Pernier, J., Mauguire, F. and Bertrand, O. Sequential color mapping system of brain potentials. Comput. Methods Progr. Biomed., 1982, 20: 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hari, R. On brains magnetic responses to sensory stimuli. J. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1991, 8: 157–169.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hari, R., Hämäläinen, M., Ilmoniemi, R. and Lounasmaa, O.V. MEG versus EEG localization test. Ann. Neurol., 1991, 30: 222–223.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, D. Principles of spatial analysis. In: A.S. Gevins and A. Rémond (Eds.), EEG Handbook (Methods of analysis of brain electrical and magnetic signals), Elsevier, New York, Amsterdam, 1987: 309–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes da Silva, F.H., Wieringa, H.J. and Peters, M.J. Source localization of EEG versus MEG: Empirical comparison using visually evoked responses and theoretical considerations. Brain Topography, 1991, 4: 133–142.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lüders, H., Dinner, D.S., Lesser, R.P. and Morris, H.H. Evoked potentials in cortical localization. J. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1986, 3: 75–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lüders, H., Lesser, R.P., Hahn, J., Dinner, D.S. and Klem, G. Cortical somatosensory evoked potentials in response to hand stimulation. J. Neurosurg., 1983, 58: 885–894.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nunez, P.L. Localization of brain activity with electroencephalography. In: S. Sato (Ed.), Magnetoencephalography (Advances in Neurology) Vol. 54, Raven Press, New York, 1990: 39–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, A.J., Hallet, M., Cohen, L.G., Tarkka, I.M. and Dang, N. The N30 component of somatosensory evoked potentials in patients with dystonia. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1992, 84: 243–247.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rossini, P.M., Babiloni, F., Bernardi, G., Cecchi, L., Johnson, P.B., Malentacca, A., Stanzione, P. and Urbano, A. Abnormalities of short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials in parkinsonian patients. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1989, 74: 277–289.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scherg, M. Fundamentals of dipole source potential analysis. In: F. Grandori, M. Hoke and G.L. Romani (Eds.), Auditory evoked magnetic fields and electric potentials (Advances in Audiology) Vol. 6, Karger, Basel, Switzerland, 1990: 40–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherg, M. Functional imaging and localization of electromagnetic brain activity. Brain Topography, 1992, 5: 103–112.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scherg, M. and Berg, P. Use of prior knowledge in brain electromagnetic source analysis. Brain Topography, 1991, 4: 143–150.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scherg, M. and von Cramon, D. Two bilateral sources of the late AEP as identified by a spatio-temporal dipole model. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1985, 62: 32–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tiihonen, J., Hari, R. and Hämäläinen, M. Early deflections of cerebral magnetic responses to median nerve stimulation. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1989, 74: 290–296.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Oosterom, A. History and evaluation of methods for solving the inverse problem. J. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1991, 8: 371–380.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, S.J. MEG versus EEG localization test. Ann. Neurol., 1991, 30: 222.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, C.C., Cohen, D., Cuffin, B.N., Yarita, M. and Allison, T. Electrical sources in human somatosensory cortex: identification by combined magnetic and potential recordings. Science, 1985, 227: 1051–1053.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buchner, H., Fuchs, M., Wischmann, H.A. et al. Source analysis of median nerve and finger stimulated somatosensory evoked potentials: Multichannel simultaneous recording of electric and magnetic fields combined with 3d-MR tomography. Brain Topogr 6, 299–310 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01211175

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01211175

Key words

Navigation