Skip to main content
Log in

On designing economic agents that behave like human agents

  • Published:
Journal of Evolutionary Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the idea of constructing theoretical economic agents that behave like actual human agents and using them in neoclassical economic models. It does this in a repeated-choice setting by postulating “artificial agents” who use a learning algorithm calibrated against human learning data from psychological experiments. The resulting calibrated algorithm appears to replicate human learning behavior to a high degree and reproduces several “stylized facts” of learning. It can therefore be used to replace the idealized, perfectly rational agents in appropriate neoclassical models with “calibrated agents” that represent actual human behavior. The paper discusses the possibilities of using the algorithm to represent human learning in normal-form stage games and in more general neoclassical models in economics. It explores the likelihood of convergence to long-run optimality and to Nash behavior, and the “characteristic learning time” implicit in human adaptation in the economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arthur WB (1989) Nash-Discovering Automata for Finite Action Games. Mimeo, Stanta Fe Institute

  • Arthur WB, Ermoliev YuM, Kaniovski YuM (1987a) Nonlinear Urn Processes: Asymptotic Behavior and Applications. WP-87-85, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur WB, Ermoliev YuM, Kaniovski YuM (1987b) Urn Schemes and Adaptive Processes of Growth. Kibernetika 23:49–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur WB, Holland JH, Palmer R (1993) Adaptive Behavior in the Stock Market. Santa Fe Institute (in press)

  • Bailey JT, Mazur JE (1990) Choice Behavior in Transition: Development of Preference for the Higher Probability of Reinforcement. J. Exp Analysis Behav 53:409–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray MM (1982) Learning, Estimation, and the Stability of Rational Expectations. J Econ Theory 26:318–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush RR, Mosteller F (1955) Stochastic Models for Learning. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg D, Kreps DM (1988) Learning, Experimentation, and Equilibrium in Games, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner RA (1957) Probability-Learning with Two and Three Choices. Am J Psychol 70:174–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg D (1989) Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodnow JJ (1955) Determinants of Choice-Distribution in Two-Choice Situations. Am J Psychol 68:106–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebb DO (1949) The Organization of Behavior. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein R (1979) Derivatives of Matching. Psychol Rev 86:486–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein R, Vaughan W (1980) Melioration and Behavioral Allocation. In: Straddon JE (ed) The Allocation of Individual Behavior Academic Press, New York, pp 143–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein R, Prelec D, Loewenstein GF, Vaughan W (1990) Maximization and Melioration. Mimeo, Harvard

  • Holland JH (1986) Escaping Brittleness: The Possibilities of General Purpose Machine Learning Algorithms Applied to Parallel Rule-based Systems. In: Michalski R, Carbonell J, Mitchell T (eds) Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach, vol 2. Kaufman, Los Altos, Ca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland JH, Holyoak KJ, Nisbet RE, Thagard PR (1987) Induction: Process of Inference, Learning, and Discovery. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull CL (1943) Principles of Behavior. Appleton-Century Crofts, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce RD (1959) Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis.Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas RE (1978) Asset Prices in an Exchange Economy. Econometrica 46:1429–1445

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcet A, Sargent T (1989) Convergence of Least Squares Learning Mechanisms in Self-Referential Linear Stochastic Models. J Econ Theory 48:337–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Marimon RE, McGrattan E, Sargent T (1989) Money as a Medium of Exchange in an Economy with Artificially Intelligent Agents. Santa Fe Institute, Paper 89-004

  • Milgrom P, Roberts J (1991) Adaptive and Sophisticated Learning in Repeated Normal Form Games. Games and Economic Behavior 3:82–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Narendra K, Thathachar MAL (1989) Learning Automata: An Introduction. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Neimark ED, Estes WK (eds) (1967) Stimulus Sampling Theory. Holden-Day, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • nevelson MB, Hasminskii RZ (1976) Stochastic Approximation and Recursive Estimation, vol 47 American Math. Soc. Providence, RI

    Google Scholar 

  • Pemantle R (1988) Nonconvergence to Unstable Points in Urn Models and Stochastic Approximations. Mimeo, Statistics Department, U.C. Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Restle F, Greeno JG (1970) Introduction to Mathematical Psychology. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild M (1974) A Two-Armed Bandit Theory of Market Pricing. J Econ Theory 9:185–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg S (1963) Stochastic Learning Theory. In: Handbook of Mathematical Psychology. Luce RD, Bush RR, Galanter E (eds) Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman EC (1932) Purposive Behavior in Animals and Men. Appleton-Crofts, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsetlin ML (1973) Automaton Theory and Modeling of Biological Systems. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsypkin YaZ (1973) Foundations of the Theory of Learning Systems. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Turing AM (1956) Can a Machine Think? In: Newman JR, (ed) The World of Mathematics. Simon and Schuster, New York, pp 2009–2123

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arthur, W.B. On designing economic agents that behave like human agents. J Evol Econ 3, 1–22 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01199986

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01199986

Key words

JEL-classification

Navigation