Skip to main content
Log in

The gall miteAceria cladophthirus. I. Life-cycle, survival outside the gall and symptoms' expression on susceptible or resistantSolanum dulcamara plants

  • Published:
Experimental & Applied Acarology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The gall miteAceria cladophthirus (Nalepa) is able to survice outside its gall on detached leaves ofSolanum dulcamara L. kept under non-aseptic in-vitro conditions. The survival rate of the females on susceptible leaves is about 90% after 1 day and 85% for the following days. In contrast, on resistant leaves, less than 40$ survive after 1 day while necrotic local lesions develop and later the mortality increases severely. However, the mite only completes its life-cycle on susceptible leaves. The life-cycle forA. cladophthirus takes about 12 days: six days for egg incubation and six days for two instars growth. Its life-history is simple, without alternating females specialised for hibernation; arrhenotokous parthenogenesis occurs in experimental conditions. Eggs do not play any role in gall formation. Immature stages induce gall symptoms but are less efficient than females. Mite feeding only induces complete gall symptoms on the less differentiated leaves of susceptible shoots. On susceptible detached leaves, gall symptoms are similar but weaker and their intensity decreases with increasing leaf age; fully expanded leaves remain free of symptoms.

On resistant plants, mite feeding induces a hypersensitive response: necrotic local lesions, about 350 μm in diameter, appear both on shoots and on detached leaves. However, young leaves develop smaller lesions than old ones. Females induce larger lesions than first larvae. Once necrosis formation is initiated, it proceeds to completion regardless of the duration of mite feeding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey, J.A., 1982, Mechanisms of phytoalexin accumulation. In: J.A. Bailey and J.W. Mansfield (Editors), Phytoalexins, Blackie, Glasgow/London, pp. 289–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronner, R. and Westphal, E., 1987 a. Modification des noyaux des cellules épidermiques foliaires de Solanacées soumises à l'action d'un Acarien cécidogène,Eriophyes cladophthirus. In: Proc. ler Congr. Soc. Fr. Phytopathol, 19–20 November 1987, Rennes, France, p. 37.

  • Bronner, R. and Westphal, E., 1987b. Quelques aspects de la résistance par hypersensibilité deSolanum dulcamara à l'attaque cécidoène d'un Acarien (Eriophyes cladophthirus). In: Proc. ler Congr. Societe Francais de Phytopathologie, 19–20 November 1987, Rennes, France. Ecole Nationale Superieure d'Agronomic, Rennes, p. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhr, H. (Editor), 1964. Bestimmungstabellen Gallen and Pflanzen Mittel-u. Nordeuropas. Fischer, Jena, 1573 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R.W., 1974. Studies on the feeding behaviour of the eriophyid miteAbararus hystrix, a vector of grass viruses. Ann. Appl. Biol., 78: 213–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C.C., 1967. Eriophyidae of Kansas. Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull., 47: 601–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeppson, L. R., Keifer, H.H. and Baker, E.W., (Editors), 1975. Mites Injurious to Economic Plants. Univ. California Press, Berkeley, 614 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keifer, H.H., 1942. Enophyid Studies XII (Experiments proving structural deuterogyny). Bull. Calif. Dep. Agric., 31: 117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keifer, H.H., 1959. Eriophyid studies, XXVI. Bull. Calif. Dep. Agric., 47: 278–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keifer, H.H., Baker, E.W., Kono, T., Delfinado, M. and Styer, W.E., (Editors), 1982. An Illustrated Guide to Plant Abnormalities caused by Eriophyid Mites in North America. USDA, Agric. Res. Serv., Agric. Handb. No. 573, 178 pp.

  • Krantz, G.W., 1973. Observations on the morphology and behaviour of the filbert rust miteAculus comatus (Prostigmata: Eriophyoidea) in Oregon. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 66: 706–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige, T. and Skoog, F., 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nalepa, A., 1911. Eriophyiden, Gallmilben. Zoologica XXIV, 61: 166–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neměc, B., 1924. Untersuchung über Eriophyidengallen. Studies from the Plant Physiological Laboratory of Charles University, Prague, V. 2: 47–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, G.N., Hobza, R.F. and Wilson, N.S., 1970. Discovery and characterization of spermatophores in the eriphyoidea (Acari). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 63: 520–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putman, W.L., 1939. The plum nursey mite (Phyllocoptes fockeui N. and T.). Ann. Rep. Entomol. Soc. Ont., 7: 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schevtchenko, V.G., 1957. The life history of alder gall mite,Eriophyes laevi (Nal.). Zool. J., 36: 598–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slykhuis, J.T., 1967. Methods for experimenting with mite transmission of plant viruses. In: Methods in Virology, 1. Academic Press, New York, pp. 347–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternlicht, M. and Goldenberg, S., 1971. Fertilization, sex ratio, and postembryonic stages of the citrus bud mite,Aceria sheldoni (Ewing). Bull. Entomol. Res., 60: 391–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen, J., 1975. Development and histology of galls onTilia plathyphylla caused byEriophyes tiliae tiliae. Bot. Tidsskr., 69: 262–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, E., 1977. Morphogenèse, ulstrastructure et étiologie de quelques galles d'Eriophyides (Acariens). Marcellia, 39: 193–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, E., 1980) Response of some Solanaceae to attack by the gall miteEriophyes cladophthirus. Plant Dis., 64: 406–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, E., Bronner, R. and Le Ret, M., 1981. Changes in leaves of suceptible and resistantSolanum dulcamara infested by the gall miteEriophyes cladophthirus (Acarina, Eriophyoidea). Can. J. Bot., 59: 875–882.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, E., Bronner, R., Dreger, F. and Anthony, M., 1988a. Relations hôte-parasite entre un AcarienEriophyes cladophthirus Nal. et différentes variétés de pommes de terre. Proc. 6th Int. Conf. Pests in Argriculture, 1–3 December 1988, Paris, France. Association National de Protection des Plantes, pp. 559–602.

  • Westphal, E., Bronner, R., Dreger, F. and Anthony, M., 1988b. Variabilité des réponses des pommes de terre à l'agression d'un Acarien,Aceria cladophthirus. In: Proc. 113th Congr. National des Sociétés Savantes, 5–9 April, Strasbourg, France, (in press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Westphat, E., Dreger, F. & Bronner, R. The gall miteAceria cladophthirus. I. Life-cycle, survival outside the gall and symptoms' expression on susceptible or resistantSolanum dulcamara plants. Exp Appl Acarol 9, 183–200 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01193428

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01193428

Keywords

Navigation