Skip to main content
Log in

A case study of mercury and methylmercury dynamics in a Hg-contaminated municipal wastewater treatment plant

  • Published:
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study of total Hg (Hg) and methylmercury (MeHg) was performed in a 40 mgd capacity municipal sewage treatment plant in which elemental Hg was used as a seal in 3 trickling filter center columns. Each seal contains several hundred kg of Hg. The seals have leaked repeatedly over time, prompting the current remediation study and ongoing replacement of the Hg seals with mechanical seals. A mass balance conducted three times while the seals were in place showed that the plant acted as a net source of both Hg and MeHg during normal operation. The average amount of Hg released in sludge plus effluent was 157 g Hg and 0.4g MeHg/d. Of this total, 138 g Hg and 0.3 g MeHg were in excess of influent wastewater, and were contributed by the WTP itself. About 95% of the total Hg was released in sludge, with only 6 to 7 g/d released to the receiving water body. However, on average, about 70% of the MeHg leaving the plant was released to the river. Effluent MeHg concentrations were 4–6 ng/L. The plant components that acted as the major sources of both total and MeHg within the plant were the trickling filters (TFs). Metallic Hg accidentally lost from the center column seals has accumulated in the rock filter media and underbedding of the tricking filters. MeHg production across the TFs was positively related to the Hg concentration in each of the TFs. A substantial fraction of the total Hg but not of MeHg was lost to sludge in each settling step. About 50% of the remaining MeHg appeared to be degraded during the tertiary aeration step.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balogh, S. and L. Liang. 1995. Wat. Air Soil Poll. This volume.

  • Bloom, N. 1989. Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci. 46: 1131–1140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, N. and W.F. Fitzgerald. 1988. Anal. Chim. Acta 208:151–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entech Engineering. 1993. City of Reading Wastewater Treatment Plant Mercury Investigation Work Plan. 68 pp.

  • Fitzgerald, W. and C.J. Watras. 1989. Sci. Tot. Environ., 87/88: 232–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, G.A. and W.F. Fitzgerald. 1987. Marine Chem. 20: 227–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour, C.C., E.A. Henry and R. Mitchell. 1992. Environ. Sci. Technol. 26:2281–2287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour, C.C. and E.A. Henry. 1991. Environ. Poll. 71: 131–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvat, M., N.S. Bloom and L. Liang. 1993a. Anal. Chim. Acta 282: 135–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvat, M., L. Liang and N.S. Bloom. 1993b. Anal. Chim. Acta 282: 153–168.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilmour, C.C., Bloom, N.S. A case study of mercury and methylmercury dynamics in a Hg-contaminated municipal wastewater treatment plant. Water Air Soil Pollut 80, 799–803 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01189731

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01189731

Keywords

Navigation