Skip to main content
Log in

Pharmacokinetic dose estimates of mercury in children and dose-response curves of performance tests in a large epidemiological study

  • Published:
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An analysis was performed of a large epidemiological study conducted in New Zealand to evaluate the neurological effects of prenatal methylmercury (MeHg) exposure in children. In the epidemiological study, 6-year-old children, whose mothers had been exposed to MeHg through the consumption of fish, were administered performance tests to ascertain academic attainment, language development, fine and gross motor coordination, intelligence and social adjustment. These responses were correlated with estimates of prenatal exposure based on average maternal hair concentrations during pregnancy. The Benchmark Dose analysis performed in the current study suggests that the NOAEL for the most sensitive indicator of developmental effects (Test of Language Development — grammar understanding) occurs at approximately 17 ppm Hg in maternal hair. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for MeHg was developed which coherently described MeHg pharmacokinetics in the adult rat, monkey and man, and predicts fetal levels of MeHg fromin utero exposure. The model includes a description of enterohepatic recirculation of MeHg, conversion to inorganic mercury in tissues and intestinal flora, slowly reversible incorporation of mercury in tissues, and excretion of both organic and inorganic mercury into urine, feces, and hair. Analysis with the PBPK model indicates that fetal brain concentrations of MeHg at the NOAEL are on the order of 50 ppb (μg/L), and are associated with maternal dietary intakes of MeHg ranging from 0.8 to 2.5μg/kg/day. Since this analysis is based on the most sensitive endpoint in a large, general human population, no uncertainty factor should be necessary using the standard USEPA approach for setting RfDs. Therefore, the RfD suggested by this analysis would be a factor of from 3 to 8 above the current USEPA RfD of 0.3μg/kg/day.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aschner, M. and Aschner, J.: 1990,Neurosci. & Biobehav. Rev. 14, 169–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aschner, M. and Clarkson, T.: 1988.Teratology 38, 145–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballatori, N. and Clarkson, T.: 1983,Am. J. Physiol. 244, G435-G441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballatori, N. and Clarkson, T.: 1985,Am J Physiol 248, G238-G245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birke, G., Johnels, G., Plantin, L-O., Sjostrand, B., Skerfving, S., Westermark, T.: 1972,Arch. Environ. Health 25:77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourne, G. H.: 1975.The Rhesus Monkey. Vol 1. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbacher, T., Rodier, P., Weiss, B.: 1990,Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 12, 191–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbacher, T. M., Mohamed, M. K., Mottett, N. K.: 1988,Reprod. Toxicol. 1, 267–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, B.: 1989,Prog. Neurobiol. 32, 447–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, T.: 1990,Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 9, 957–961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, T., Amin-Zaki, L., Tikriti, S.: 1976,Fed. Proc. 35, 2395–2399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, C., Clarkson, T., Marsh, D., Amin-Zaki, L., Tikriti, S., Myers, G..: 1989,Environ. Res. 49, 318–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crump, K.S.: 1984,Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 4, 854–871.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crump, K.S.: 1994,Risk Anal. (in press).

  • Evans, H., Garman, R.H., Weiss, B.: 1977,Toxicol. and Appl. Pharmacol. 41, 15–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farris, F., Dedrick, R., Allen, P., Smith, J.: 1993,Toxicol. and Appl. Pharmacol. 119, 74–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faustman, E., Allen, B., Kimmel, C., Kavlock, R.: 1994,Fund. Appl. Toxicol. (in press).

  • Forsyth, R.P., Nies, A.S., Wyler, F., Neutze, J., Melmon, K.L.: 1968,J. Appl. Physiol. 25, 736–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaylor, D.W. and Slikker, W.: 1990,Neuro Toxicology 11, 211–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlowski, L.E. and Jain, R.K.: 1983,J. Pharm. Sci. 72, 1103–1126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hytten, F.E. and Leitch, I.: 1971,The Physiology of Human Pregnancy, Blackwell, 599 pp.

  • International Commission on Radiological Protection: 1975,Report of the Task Group on Reference Man — ICRP Publication 23, 480 pp.

  • Kawasaki, Y., Ikeda Y., Yamamoto T., Ikeda K.: 1986,J. Food Hyg. Soc. Jpn. 27, 528–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, C. and Gaylor, D.: 1988,Risk Anal. 8, 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjelstrom, T., Kennedy, P., Wallis, S., Stewart, A., Fribert, L., Lind, B., Wutherspoon, T., Mantell, C.: 1989, National Swedish Environmental Protection Board Report 3642.

  • Rice, D.: 1989,J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 27, 189–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, D., Krewski, D., Collins, B., Willes, R.: 1989,Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 12, 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherlock, J., Hislop, J., Newton, D., Topping, G., Whittle, K.: 1984,Human Toxicol. 3, 117–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, A.: 1993,Risk Anal. 13, 355–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1990. Interim Methods for Development of Inhalation Reference Concentrations. EPA/600/8-90/066A.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gearhart, J.M., Clewell, H.J., Crump, K.S. et al. Pharmacokinetic dose estimates of mercury in children and dose-response curves of performance tests in a large epidemiological study. Water Air Soil Pollut 80, 49–58 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01189652

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01189652

Keywords

Navigation